Preview

Mock Trial Closings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mock Trial Closings
Closing

Introduction The closing argument is the last piece of a mock trial, essentially the last time you get to sell your case to the jury. During the closing argument, you are summarizing and putting together everything the jury has already heard during the trial. You are basically clarifying everything presented in the trial from showing the relevance of a particular witness to showing how everything you’ve presented comes together to prove your case.

It is one of the most important parts of mock trial, mainly because the jury listens. It is the last chance to convince the judges of your case, to show you are more skilled than your opponent, and get the perfect 10 you’re hoping for because they are the last words the jury will hear from your team. It can make your case, or break it, thus delivery is very important.

Writing the Closing

Theme An important part of a great closing is the theme. It will tie your case together in a pretty ribbon that will stay in the juries mind. It will be the same theme from the opening, one that runs through your entire case, and in the closing reminding the jury of your case with the catchy phrase or sentence.

Structure 1) Introduction: Begin with a short introduction that catches the jury’s attention. It should remind the judges of the big picture. If it’s a murder trial, talk about how tragic it is that this person’s life was taken away. If it’s a civil trial you can speak about how the person’s rights were violated. Also be sure to introduce your theme during the introduction.
2) Burden of Proof: Explain what your burden is and what your role is in relation to it. Tell the judges exactly how you’ve met the burden or how the opposing counsel has failed to met this burden. In addition, frame the burden of proof in your favor.
3) Law: Tell the judges about each element of the charge. Explain whether or not you have proved or disproved each element, or whether it is enough to prove or disprove any one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    witness planning sheet

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If you are a defendant, obviously you are arguing that you’re innocent. If you are a witness, decide whether or not you think your respective defendant is guilty. If you think s/he is guilty, work with the prosecution. If you think s/he is innocent, work with the defense.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    COMMLAW LAW ASSIGNMENT

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (Please remember that the trial will begin with an opening statement given by the plaintiff, then the plaintiff will begin direct examination of witnesses (this is where the plaintiff and his/her witnesses will be permitted to explain the plaintiff’s position on the issues). The defendant will then be able to…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    509worksheet

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Wrap up your argument with a strong conclusion. Remember, in the conclusion, you tell your audience:…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Office Memo

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just include the key facts i.e. facts that the Court would consider crucial in the case. Write short paragraphs with related information so that it will be easy to follow.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burden of proof is the responsibility of the prosecution also known as the people. This is because the 5th amendment of the Constitution gives the right to any U.S. citizen who has been accuse of a criminal offense the right to a trial by judge or jury because they are innocent until proven guilty. This is where burden of proof becomes important to the case and hard for the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. During a trial the prosecution will have to use and show evidence to show not only proving the act (actus reus) of the crime, but also the intent (mens rea).…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A defense consists of evidence and arguments offered by a defendant on behalf of his or her attorneys to show why that he or she should not be held liable for a criminal charge” (Schmalleger, Hall, Dolatowski, 2010).…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right, many people do not know how the trial process works, or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel of the courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Opening Statement

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    - It is usually best to avoid summarizing or refuting the opposition's case, but it is often good to forewarn the jury to watch for certain attempts at counterpersuasion the other side will use against you (it inoculates the jury to be resistent to counterinfluence by first exposing the jury to the arguments involved)…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Case

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    . Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atticus's closing argument was effective because of how long the jury takes to determine the verdict and…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mock Trial was a great experience for me since it was my first time doing it in my life. My role was an officer called, Officer Low. Officer Low has been on the local police force for eight and a half years. I think my role was not easy because I had to memorize all my lines in order to answer the lawyer’s question. Also, I had to know where the offender Wally Brogue was standing and where the radio, beer and marijuana were on the diagram of David Benning’s and Sara Volsky’s apartment. Plus, I had to be careful and think a lot before I answered the lawyers question because any mistake is a problem. I realized that the lawyers are picky and tricky. For instance, when I told Mr. Allen that the .06 alcohol in his blood is above the limit, he told me it was.08 and back then it was .08 but now it is .05. Therefore, I mistaken and I felt really ashamed because I should know that since I’m an officer. Also, when Mr. Allen asked to question me on the second day of the trail, he started saying, “Yesterday you did not say that Sandra Volsky’s told you that that the assailant might be still in the building.” I am sure I did. However, I did enjoy my role because I always wanted to witness something since I was young. I feel like when I witness an offender I help the court identify if the person is guilty or not. When the lawyers interviewed me, I was told to not mention few things unless the other lawyers ask about it. Also, the crown lawyers warned me to not lie and to be honest and just answer the question without giving much detail because they wanted to use a things to argue it lot of .I thought Sandra Volsky did will on her role because she gave right evidences and she tried to proof that Brogue killed David. She also seemed sad about her boyfriend’s death and looked innocent. Wally Brogue did a good job offending himself and I liked his enthusiasm during the trial. For example, Wally was laughing and said to the lawyer twice, “Do you think I read people’s mind?”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. A long arm statute permits a court to obtain jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cross-examination is a very important process in summary trial. The main object of cross-examination is to find the truth and defection of falsehood in human testimony. It is design to destroy or weaken the force of evidence a witness has already given in person or elicit something into your favour which he has not stated to discredit him by showing object of cross-examination from a litigious standpoint.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays