The article Swartz wrote pointed out to many people that phone companies can track one’s cell phone by tower signals. Swartz also alerted citizens that the government could use similar methods to secretly monitor movements of suspects. The main idea of Swartz’s essay is that the prosecutors have not been successful in accessing court approval to gain evidence against suspects. Swartz quotes, “Prosecutors argue that having such data is crucial to finding suspects, corroborating their whereabouts with witness accounts, or helping build a case for a wiretap on the phone” (302). In the last paragraph of Swartz’s article she soothes people’s conscience by quoting, “[T]he stream of data that carries a telephone conversation or an e-mail message contains a great deal of information, including when and where the communications originated. And that makes it harder for courts to determine whether a certain digital surveillance method invokes Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches”
The article Swartz wrote pointed out to many people that phone companies can track one’s cell phone by tower signals. Swartz also alerted citizens that the government could use similar methods to secretly monitor movements of suspects. The main idea of Swartz’s essay is that the prosecutors have not been successful in accessing court approval to gain evidence against suspects. Swartz quotes, “Prosecutors argue that having such data is crucial to finding suspects, corroborating their whereabouts with witness accounts, or helping build a case for a wiretap on the phone” (302). In the last paragraph of Swartz’s article she soothes people’s conscience by quoting, “[T]he stream of data that carries a telephone conversation or an e-mail message contains a great deal of information, including when and where the communications originated. And that makes it harder for courts to determine whether a certain digital surveillance method invokes Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches”