I, Oliver Ellsworth representative of Connecticut, propose that the basis of representation in the legislative branch remain by state as under the Articles of Confederation. I support the system of government that maintains the principle of local rule and I understand central government as the body that will strengthen the rights of property and the harmony of the republic, therefore I claim “we” are partly national and partly federal. Under this I shall introduce the resolution with my ally Roger Sherman along with William S. Johnson, The Great Compromise, breaking the deadlock between the large and small states over representative, allowing United States senators to be elected by state legislature. I do agree with Randolph’s notion of a…
The point of the Joseph Ellis writing this book was is to expose the reader to historical events that would eventually lead up to the formation of the United States government’s present and future generations. He achieves this point by exploring and speaking about the challenges that the founding…
Write 350 to 700 words on how local, state, and federal governments cooperate on one of the issues in the table:…
Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…
3. How does this issue affect our government at the local, state, and national levels?…
The article “Federalism and American Inequality” explores the issue of American economic inequality in a new way. Although this article did not present a perfect cure for inequality, that was never its goal. Simply it was an attempt to increase our understanding of inequality in our nation, and encourage both Federal, State, and Local Governments, along with citizens to use whatever influence they might have to fight…
In the 1970s regulated federalism began to build up steam as for how our new form of federalism would operate. In this new method, of regulated federalism, congress would pass laws requiring states and localities to follow through with out a choice or say in the matter. This is contrast to cooperative federalism as the federal government did not directly force states and localities to follow through, but if they did not they would not receive government grants and funding in that certain area. However, the government did have good reason for this practice, they wanted to create more unity and uniformity between the states, “The effect of these national standards is that state and local policies in the areas of environmental protection, social services, and education are more uniform from coast to coast than are other nationally funded policies”(WTP 94).…
How is it we see a distinct change in how federalism is portrayed and influenced with every new style of government? The way problems and politics have influenced federalism suggests that the manipulation of politics and world influences in fact changes the fundamentals and delivery of a federal model. It is apparent that a federal model 90 years ago represents little of what the new and emerging models are or may become. Between both major political parties we have seen a separation in the way our federal nation would operate. Federalism has been strongly shaped by party ideology and platforms. (Hollander and Papatan 2007) suggest that the changes in our federalism model is keeping the cutting edge of reform, finally seeing the progress being made towards a better way to conduct business. Difficulties with effecting reform will be that someone has to lose out. Both involve trade-offs of efficiency with equity and will face opposition by those adversely affected.…
Black and Black’s, “The Rise of Southern Politics”, outlines the transformation of Southern politics over 50 years as a significant contributing factor and development in Southern history. From the story we see the emergence of the Republican Party followed by the Democratic Party; both parties that has since caused a political battle for everything politics. Earl and Merle Black outline the slow, yet remarkable story of politics. The book tells a story of political competiveness in elections and from both sides of parties. By using research and analyzing the political structure Black and Black focuses in on topics such as religion, race, economic structures, and the candidates who keep the political system…
As time passes by we start to realize that everything is connected somehow. Even in history one thing leads to another, a domino effect. However, politics makes it impossible to have one answer to a simple question. Whether there is no answer, one answer, or two answers there is always opposition and consequences of those decisions. The impact of those decisions can either be seen right away or gradually build. Throughout the course of history, policies have been introduced, decisions have been taken, disagreements have been made, ideals have been questioned, concerns have risen, but the political system has lived through it all. A time period that became a critical period in shaping America’s political system was the Federalist Era while before that the Articles of Confederation displayed their significance.…
based on Wilson’s commentary, we take note of the fact that the congressmen priorities attempting to make things easier, when in reality they are diluting the source of authority and spreading responsibility so widely that Congress as a whole decentralizes and nothing gets done. The multiplicity of leaders creates a complex House, one too complex to regulate the uninformed, yet passionate, people who deeply crave the passing of their bill in addition to acknowledging that people are acting upon the publics’ reactions to injustice. There is so much to get done, but because of the lack of leadership and the decentralization of Congress, the bills that may make a difference to the nation due to its passing are not being acknowledged because of the inability for professional men and women to come together and problem solve instead of fighting over overlapping jurisdictions and debating on what the proper disposition of any bill is that lies between two distinct committee jurisdictions. Thus it becomes evident that too many standing committees are distracting the efficiency of notable tasks from being accomplished. Aside from Wilson, Edmund Burke also touches on the topic of committees and how it contributes to the decentralization of Congress.…
* Until I return, Peter Sagal, host of NPR's "Wait, Wait ... Don't Tell Me," will be giving my first 4 lectures by you watching each of his following 4 PBS videos on line, each of which is 53 minutes long. Important points of each WILL BE on exam # 1. The four episodes include... (1) A More Perfect Union, (2) It's a Free Country, (3) Created Equal, (4) Built to Last, and they each can be viewed at http://video.pbs.org/program/constitution-usa-peter-sagal/ Peter Sagal breathes new life into the traditional civics lesson, by travelling across the country on a Harley Davidson to find out where the U.S. Constitution lives, how it works and how it doesn't ... how it unites us as a nation and how it has nearly torn us apart. Sagal introduces some major constitutional debates today and talks with…
After reading the Federalist #10 paper, I found two statements that I thought were most important. The first was James Madison discussing the common people’s thought process. He believed the public’s complaints and dissatisfaction was inevitable due to the government’s instability. The publics common good and welfare will always be disregarded and not acknowledged to its full potential. He stated that outcomes and results were usually decided without accordance to justice. No one wanted to follow the rules either. Unfortunately, the minor parties are usually disregarded and go unrecognized and unheard.…
"The Storm: Chaos and Tragedy": Answer the following questions as you view the PBS video excerpt "Chaos and Tragedy."…
Sheffield, L.B. (2013, May 15). 13 Ways the 113th Congress Can Improve Education in America. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://www.heritage.org/research…