Preview

Miranda Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miranda Case
K. Kraus
WRT 102
11 May 2013
Research Paper 1st Draft.

Racial discrimination against Black Americans in The United States in the 20th century Richard Wright, an American author that wrote about racial prejudice in the 20th century. (Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia) He wrote about Negro-white relations in America, and also how Black Americans coped with how their America was treating them in the 20th century. In his autobiographical “Black Boy”, Wright reveals in bitter personal terms the devastating impact of prejudice on a black person in the City of Chicago, and New York during his formative years. He expressed his frustration in his early stories, and novels, with the experiences of Negro males and females both in the North and in the South, within their own communities as well as in their relationships with white Americans and white institutions (C. ". Norvell). Black men living in America during the 20th century was subject to harsh and cruel injustice, also by their government. The ill-treatment of Black Americans was the norm in America in the mid 1950’s to 1970’s, and this treatment towards Afican Americans seems to still have an effect on young black males in today’s society. The Black males in today’s society from New York to Los Angeles feel that they are getting the short end of the stick, when it comes to opportunities’ that the white Americans seem to get, which is not as harsh, of what the black males faced in the 50’s, nevertheless still hurts as deep as it did back at that time. In the short story “Big Black Good Man,” Richard Wright writes about a white character named Olaf who considers himself not a racist, until he encounters the character named Jim, a big black man, who was so black his skin seemed to appear blue. The appearance of Jim had an effect on Olaf that brought to the forefront his racial preconception. The white man, therefore, is superstitious about race, equating black skin with all that is primitive and dangerous. (C. ".

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    FACTS: The cases of Mr. Miranda, Mr. Vignera, Mr. Stewart and Mr. Westover had similar cases, regarding the admissibility of their confessions. These cases were then addressed together by the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Miranda was identified by a witness and arrested, but was not notified of his rights, although he singed a written confession after several hours of interrogation that stated that he was aware of the rights he was not notified about. A jury was presented an oral admission of guilt, as well as the written confession. The jury found Mr. Miranda guilty of murder and rape, and sentenced him to 20-30 years on both counts. Mr. Vignera, who was the second defendant, was arrested for a…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda v. Arizona case is considered to be one of the most important and famous cases in modern law history that provided the foundation for some important legal provisions. It occurred in 1966 in Arizona, when a young man named Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was charged with robbery, kidnapping, and rape of a young woman several years prior the trial (Zalman, 2010). Before the suspect was interrogated, the police did not inform him of his constitutional right to remain silent which allowed the interrogators to get the confession. Given that this case provided the foundation for the right to remain silent, it became very famous and important. The present paper attempts to analyze the…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year 1966 was a turning point for rights of United States citizens because of the Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda was arrested for rape and kidnapping of a woman. Following his arrest, he was convicted based on his confession of the crime. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court ruled that his rights were violated according to the Fifth Amendment, which lead to his release. Reynolds Lancaster and Gina Jones were two authors that pointed importance of rights and issues related to the case Miranda v. Arizona, which lead to the Miranda warning.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case, the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial, he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly, this letter stated that Miranda had full knowledge of his legal rights. From the evidence found, Miranda was sentenced to prison for 20 to 30 years. From here the Supreme Court stated that, “...Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession…” (Miranda V Arizona).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Citation: 384 U.S. 436, 10 Ohio Misc. 9, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966)…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It's also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGE 136)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Background: A Mexican immigrant residing in Phoenix, Arizona, Ernesto Miranda, was identified to be a suspect in the line-up of a woman who accused him of rape and kidnapping. Police then arrested and interrogated Miranda. It took up to at least two hours of interrogation by police until Miranda the confessed to the crimes. The confession was written. During the two hours of interrogation, police did not once mention Miranda’s neither Fifth Amendment Protection against self-incrimination nor his Sixth amendment right to have the right to an attorney. After Miranda’s confession the case was then taken to trial hosted by Arizona state court an prosecutors used the oral and written confession as evidence against Miranda. Miranda was then found guilty and he was convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison on each count. The conviction was then upheld due to the fact the Miranda’s attorney appealed to Arizona’s Supreme Court which then led to the case being appealed to the United States Supreme Court which also connected the case with four other similar ones. The court later came to an agreement that it is mandatory that the police have the role of protecting the rights of the accused suspect guaranteed by the…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black Boy is an autobiography of Richard Wright who grew up in the backwoods of Mississippi. He lived in poverty, hunger, fear, and hatred. He lied, stole, and had rage towards those around him; at six he was a "drunkard," hanging about in taverns. He was surrounded on one side by whites who were either indifferent to him, pitying, or cruel, and on the other by blacks who resented anyone trying to rise above the common people who were slaves or struggling.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mіrаndа vs. Arizona was а case that consіdеrеd the rights of the dеfеndаnts in criminal cases in regards to the power of the government. Indіvіduаl rights did not change with the Mіrаndа decision; however it created new constitutional guidelines for law enforcement, attorneys, and the courts. The guidelines ensure that the individual rights of the fifth, sixth and the fourteenth amendment are protected. This decision requires that unless а suspect in custody has been informed of his constitutional rights before questioning anything he says may not be introduced in а court of law (Mіrаndа v. Arizona, 1966). The decision requires law enforcement officers to follow а code of conduct when arresting suspects. After an arrest is made, before they may begin questioning they must first advise the suspect of their rights, and make sure that the suspect understands them.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the significance of the role of individuals in reducing racial discrimination in the USA throughout the period 1877-1981…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2 years later followed by his second fictional piece, The Man Who Was Almost a Man, which was followed a year later by Native Son. Richard Wright also published works of nonfiction, which include 12 Million Black Voices, printed in 1941 by New York: Viking, as well as essays and poetry. Blackboy was “designed to illuminate how obscene was [the] denial of access to full participation in the democratic process by law, custom, and the practice of race”. It was a way for Americans, and for the readers, to see Richard’s response “to the call of the most sacred American principles regarding human rights” (XV). His autobiography stirred success that followed Uncle Tom’s Children and the financial stability from Native Son. The purpose was to inform his readers of his life as a child and how it felt like to be a black male in “an oppressive society” (XV) and it’s consistency remains the same throughout the…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda was not informed of his rights prior to the police interrogation. During the two-hour interrogation, Miranda allegedly confessed to committing the crimes, which the police apparently recorded. Miranda, who had not finished ninth grade and had a history of mental instability, had no counsel present. At trial, the prosecution's case consisted solely of his confession. Miranda was convicted of both rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. He appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, claiming that the police had unconstitutionally obtained his confession. The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction. Miranda appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1966.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona was the case that altered the criminal justice system. It gives criminals the rights they do not deserve. Ernesto Miranda was the man who was responsible for the change in law enforcement. He argued that he was not informed of his rights during his arrest and his Fifth and Sixth amendments were violated. After that, the Miranda Rights were established to protect the suspect from refusing to answer self-incriminating questions and the right to an attorney. The Fifth Amendment’ s rights protection against self- incrimination and double jeopardy, and right to a grand jury indictment . The Sixth Amendment’s right to a speedy and public trial, trial by jury, confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses, and counsel.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits voting discrimination. With the condition to receive preclearance stated in section 5 of the Act from the Department of Justice before making any changes affecting the voting process, also came four other prohibitions. The prohibition of literacy test or other similar test or devices as a prerequisite to voter registration is one prevention. The requirement of jurisdictions with significant language minority populations to provide non-English ballots and oral voting instructions is another. Third is the prohibition of vote dilution, which is the remapping of districts to suppress the minority vote. The final provision was one of the most controversial of the Act. It established the federal oversight over the administrations of elections in areas where racism and discrimination thrived. This provision of the VRA was one of the most controversial because some citizens believed it was a major intrusion of States rights.…

    • 3674 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weatherspoon, F. (2006). RACIAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN. North Carolina Law Journal. Retrieved from http://users.law.capital.edu/fweatherspoon/Publications/racialjusticeandequity.pdf…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays