Medoc Company

Topics: Economics, Financial economics, Rational choice theory Pages: 24 (8324 words) Published: January 28, 2011
Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2006


The principal purpose of this study is to piece together the important development and contributions by efficient market hypothesis, bounded rationality, behavioral finance, neurofinance, and the recently introduced adaptive market hypothesis. In the process the author will review the selected literature so that they can be linked together for further consideration and development. When monthly and daily data for S&P 500, DJIA, and NASDAQ indexes were analyzed from 1971 to 2005, the author found long string of positive and significant autocorrelations and great volatility, which were not consistent with the efficient market hypothesis. The international market indexes from Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Mexico, Taiwan, and Canada are also very volatile even though they show less volatility compared to the U.S. indexes. Since AMH was introduced in 2004, it is promising but is still at its infant stage of development. Finally, the neural/medical finance can help us understand the brain activities when investors are making investing and trading decisions, and the effect of drugs on brain and investment decision-making. The future of neurofinance and AMH appears to be promising. Key words: adaptive market hypothesis, affect and emotion, behavioral finance, bounded rationality, efficient market hypothesis, excessive volatility, neurofinance, and psychophysiology. JEL classification: N2, N20.

1. Introduction
In recent years new fronts have been rapidly developing in investments and financial markets. In particular, the behavioral finance, evolutionary finance, and neurofinance are challenging the traditional finance. Whether the financial markets, in particular the stock markets, are efficient or not and whether market participants are rational or not, depend to a large extent on the ways people look at the markets. They look at exactly the same empirical evidence or findings, but they may interpret the observations quite differently. People are yet different biologically, genetically, in education and training, in experience, in opportunities, and many other aspects. Financial market participants and researchers have diversified background in education, training, experience, investment objectives, available information, time constraint, capability of analyzing and processing available data, and the ability to predict the future uncertain conditions. Active investors and academic researchers are quite different in many aspects just mentioned. Technical analysis, which is inconsistent with efficient market hypothesis (EMH), has been an important tool for most market participants since the beginning of financial markets. The key controversy between proponents of EMH and advocates of behavioral finance centers on the extent or degree of market efficiency, investors’ rationality, and interpretations of many empirical findings. The theoretical foundations of EMH rest on three basic assumptions. First, market participants are perfectly rational and are able to value securities rationally. Second, even if there are some investors who are not rational, their trading activities will either cancel out with one another or will be arbitraged away by rational investors (Shleifer, 2000). Finally, market participants have well defined subjective utility functions which they will maximize. According to Simon (1982, vol. 2, p. 408), “Rationality denotes a style of behavior that is appropriate to the achievement of given goals, within the limits imposed by given conditions and constraints. Theories of rational behavior may be normative or descriptive, that is, they may prescribe how people or organizations should behave in order to achieve certain goals under certain *

Craig School of Business, California State University at Fresno, USA.

© K.C. Tseng, 2006...

References: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Balvers, R., Wu, R. & Gilliland, E. (2000) Mean reversion across national stock markets and parametric contrarian investment strategies, Journal of Finance 55, 745-772. Barber, B. & Odean, T. (2000) Trading is hazardous to your wealth: the common stock investment performance of individual investors, Journal of Finance 55, 773-806. Barber, B. & Odean, T. (2001) The Internet and the investor, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 41-54. Barberis, N., Huang, M. & Santos, T. (2001) Prospect theory and asset prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1-53. Barberis,N., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1998) A model of investor sentiment, Journal of Financial Economics 49, 307-343. Barberis, N. & Thaler, R. (2003) A survey of behavioral finance, in Constantinides, M. Harris, M. & Stulz, R.M. (2003) Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 1B, 1053-1123, Elsevier North Holland. Chan, L.K.C. & Lokonishok, J. (2000) New paradigm or same old hype in equity investing, Financial Analysts Journal 57, 23-36.
Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2006
8. Conlisk, J. (1996) Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature 34, 669-700. 9. Constantinides, G.M. (2002) Rational asset prices, Journal of Finance 57, 1567-1591. 10. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D. Subrahmanyam, A. (1998) Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions, Journal of Finance 53, 1839-1885. 11. Dawes, R. (2001) Everyday Irrationality: How Pseudo-Scientists, Lunatics, and the Rest of Us Systematically Fail to Think Rationally, Boulder, Co: Westview Press. 12. De Bondt,W. & Thaler, R. (1985) Does the stock market overreact?, Journal of Finance 40, 793-805. 13. De Bondt, W. & Thaler, R. (1987) Further Evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality, Journal of Finance 42, 557-581. 14. Dimson, E., Marsh, P. & Stauton, M. (2004) Irrational optimism, Association for Investment Management and Research 60, 15-25. 15. Easterwood, J. & Nutt, S. (1999) Inefficiency in analysts’ earnings forecasts: systematic misreaction or systematic optimism?, Journal of Finance 54, 1777-1797. 16. Elster, J. (1998) Emotion and economic theory, Journal of Economic Literature 36, 47-74. 17. Fama, E.F. (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work, Journal of Finance 25, 383-417. 18. Fama, E.F. (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance, Journal of Financial Economics 49, 283-306. 19. Fama, E.F. & French, K.R. (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies, Journal of Finance 51, 55-84. 20. Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Nicholson, N. Soane, E. & Willman, P. (2004) Traders: risks, decisions, and management in financial markets, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. 21. Fisher, K. & Statman, M. (2000) Investor sentiment and stock returns, Financial Analysts Journal 57, 16-23. 22. Gabaix, X. & Laibson, D. (2000) A boundedly rational decision algorithm, American Economic Review 90, 433-438. 23. Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (2001) Bounded Rational: The Adaptive Toolbox, Cambridge: MIT Press. 24. Grossman, S. (1976) On the efficiency of competitive stock markets where traders have diverse information, Journal of Finance 31, 573-585. 25. Grossman, S. & Stiglitz, J. (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient 26. Market, American Economic Review 70, 393-408. 27. Grotheer, C. (2006) Foxes, Rabbits, & Scorpions, CFA Magazine, March-April, 38-41. 28. Harrington, C. Putting behavioral finance into pratice can be a lucrative pursuit, March-April, 34-37. 29. Haugen, R. (1999) The Inefficient Stock Market, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. 30. Hirshleifer, D. (2001) Investor psychology and asset pricing, Journal of Finance 56, 15331597. 31. Hunt, R.H. & Ellis, H.C. (1999) Fundamental of Cognitive Psychology, McGraw-Hill College, 6th ed. 32. Kahneman, D. & Riepe, M. (1998) Aspects of investor psychology, Journal of Portfolio Management 24, 52-65. 33. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 34. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47, 263-291. 35. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, values, and frame, American Psychologist 39, 341-350. 36. Kuhnen, C.M. & Knutson, B. (2005) The neural basis of financial risk taking, Neuron 47, 763-770. 37. Lamont, O. (1998) Earnings and expected returns, Journal of Finance 53, 1563-1587. 38. Lo, A.W. (2004) The Adaptive markets hypothesis: market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective, Journal of Portfolio Management 30, 15-29.
Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2006
39. Lo, A.W. (2005) Reconciling efficient markets with behavioral finance: the Adaptive markets hypothesis, Journal of Investment Consulting, 7, 21-44. 40. Lo, A.W. & Mackinlay, C. (1988) Stock market prices do not follow random walks: evidence from a simple specification test, Review of Financial Studies 1, 41-66. 41. Lo, A.W. & Repin, D.V. (2002) The psychophysiology of real-time financial risk processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14, 323-339. 42. Loewenstein, G. (2000) Emotion in economic theory and economic behavior, American Economic Review 90, 426-432. 43. Malkiel, B.G. (2003) The efficient market hypothesis and its critics, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, 59-82. 44. Malkiel, B.G. (2004) Can predictable patterns in market returns be exploited using real money? Not likely, Journal of Portfolio Management 30, 131-141. 45. Markowitz, H. (1991) Foundations of portfolio theory, Journal of Finance 46, 469-477. 46. Mitchell, R. (2006) Risk: the final frontier, CFA Magazine, March/April, 25-29. 47. Odean, T. (1998a) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?, Journal of Finance 53, 1775-1798. 48. Odean, T. (1998b) Volume, volatility, price, and profits when all traders are above average, Journal of Finance, 53, 1887-1934. 49. Odean, T. (1999) Do investors trade too much?, American Economic Review 89, 1279-1298. 50. Rabin, M. (1998) Psychology and economics, Journal of Economic Literature 36, 11-46. 51. Restak, R. (2003) The New Brain: How the Modern Age is Rewiring Your Mind, New York: Rodale. 52. Rubinstein, M. (2000) Rational markets: yes or no? the affirmative case, Financial Analysts Journal 57, 15-29. 53. Selten, R. (2001) What is bounded rationality? in Gigerenzer, G. & Slelten, R. (ed.), Bounded Rationality the adaptive toolbox, Cambridge: The MIT press, 13-36. 54. Shefrin, H. (2000) Beyond Greed and Fear Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 55. Shefrin, H. & Statman, M. (1985) The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence, Journal of Finance 40, 777-790. 56. Shiller, R. (2000) Irrational Exuberance, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 57. Shiller, R. (2002) Bubbles, human judgment, and expert opinion, Financial Analysts Journal 58, 18-26. 58. Shiller, R. (2003) From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, 83-104. 59. Simon, H.A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99-118. 60. Simon, H.A. (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality, Vol. 2, Behavioral Economics and Business Organization, Cambridge: The MIT Press. 61. Simon, A. (1997) Models of Bounded Rationality, Vol. 3, Empirically Grounded Economic Reason, Cambridge: The MIT Press. 62. Simon, H.A. (1983) Alternative visions of rationality, Chapter 5 in Simon, H.A., Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 97-113. 63. Shleifer, A. (2000) Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance, New York: Oxford University Press. 64. Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (1997) The limits of arbitrage, Journal of Finance 52: 35-82. 65. Thaler, R.H. (ed.) (2005) Advances in behavioral finance, vol. 2, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press. 66. Trammell, S. (2006) Rethinking the rational man: Is modern portfolio theory just a special case with limited significance? CFA Magazine, March/April, 30-33. 67. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science 185, 1124-1131. 68. Wilson, E. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Iks Company Essay
  • Newell Company Essay
  • Companies act Essay
  • The Newell Company Essay
  • Essay on Nakamura Lacquer Company
  • Essay about Slade: Motivation and Company
  • Essay on Bagpat Engineering Company Case
  • Essay on Mebel Doran and Company

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free