Medicinal Marijuana
Legal and Ethical Issues of Medical Marijuana
The debate over legalizing the use of marijuana is rooted in real world concerns such as crime, violence and public health. It is also a problem rooted in conflicting values. Thus, while the courts and law enforcement authorities continue to crack down on marijuana use, they also have to contend with a growing public acceptance of marijuana use.
This paper examines both sides of the debate to legalize marijuana, focusing on the issue of legalizing marijuana for medicinal purposes.
The first part of the paper evaluates the arguments of those who favor keeping marijuana illegal, focusing on arguments of the gateway drug concept and the health dangers of marijuana use. The second part of the paper looks at the arguments for legalizing marijuana, especially for medicinal purposes. The paper gives special attention to the ethical and legal arguments of both sides.
In the conclusion, the paper suggests a compromise position the controlled legalization of medicinal marijuana. This position addresses the most valid concerns of those who favor the drug 's legalization while continuing to protect people from its harmful effects.
Anti-Marijuana arguments
Critics charge that the current drive to legalize medical marijuana is simply a ploy to legalize all marijuana use. Marijuana supporters are thus advancing a personal agenda, cloaking it under a blanket of seeming compassion.
No significant benefits Many experts argue that there is no scientific proof that marijuana has significant health benefits. While there are hypotheses that compounds found in marijuana may have medicinal potential, there is no medical proof that smoking the plant in its crude form is an efficient way to deliver these compounds into the body (McDonough 2000).
In fact, many physicians and patients who have tried to smoke marijuana in its crude form found the experience difficult and unpleasant. Scientists attribute this as a side-effect
The debate over legalizing the use of marijuana is rooted in real world concerns such as crime, violence and public health. It is also a problem rooted in conflicting values. Thus, while the courts and law enforcement authorities continue to crack down on marijuana use, they also have to contend with a growing public acceptance of marijuana use.
This paper examines both sides of the debate to legalize marijuana, focusing on the issue of legalizing marijuana for medicinal purposes.
The first part of the paper evaluates the arguments of those who favor keeping marijuana illegal, focusing on arguments of the gateway drug concept and the health dangers of marijuana use. The second part of the paper looks at the arguments for legalizing marijuana, especially for medicinal purposes. The paper gives special attention to the ethical and legal arguments of both sides.
In the conclusion, the paper suggests a compromise position the controlled legalization of medicinal marijuana. This position addresses the most valid concerns of those who favor the drug 's legalization while continuing to protect people from its harmful effects.
Anti-Marijuana arguments
Critics charge that the current drive to legalize medical marijuana is simply a ploy to legalize all marijuana use. Marijuana supporters are thus advancing a personal agenda, cloaking it under a blanket of seeming compassion.
No significant benefits Many experts argue that there is no scientific proof that marijuana has significant health benefits. While there are hypotheses that compounds found in marijuana may have medicinal potential, there is no medical proof that smoking the plant in its crude form is an efficient way to deliver these compounds into the body (McDonough 2000).
In fact, many physicians and patients who have tried to smoke marijuana in its crude form found the experience difficult and unpleasant. Scientists attribute this as a side-effect
Cited: Barr, Bob. (1999). "Marijuana Should Not be Legalized Under Any Pretense." Commonwealth, June. Retrieved 12 April 2003 from ProQuest Database. "Marijuana as Medicine: A Subtle Syllogism." (1996). The Economist. August 16, 1997. Retrieved 12 April 2003 from ProQuest Database. McDonough, James R. (2000). "Marijuana on the Ballot." Policy Review. April/May. Retrieved 12 April 2003 from ProQuest Database. Wickelgren, Ingrid. (2002). Newkirk, Gary (1999). "It 's Just a Weed." Modern Medicine, 67(6), June. Retrieved 12 April 2003 from ProQuest Database. "Marijuana: Harder than Thought?" Marijuana. Louise I. Gerdes, ed. San Diego: Greenhaven Press.