Preview

Legal Pot Is A Public Health Menace Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Pot Is A Public Health Menace Summary
The argument of legalizing pot has been in question for years now. William Bennett, who served as the Secretary of Education under Ronald Reagan and a Drug Czar under H.W. Bush, wrote an article called “Legal Pot Is a Public Health Menace”, that is full of hard hitting facts. Though all his facts go against the legalization of pot, not all of them are trustworthy enough to decide whether or not to legalize pot. Most of Bennett’s facts are unrepresentative, unclear, or insufficient for the claim he wants to get across to his audience. Among the many facts Bennett uses, it is more than likely to see some way where it falls short to support the logic of the article. In his first fact, he states that “a decades-long study of more than 1,000 New Zealanders who frequently smoked pot in adolescence pegged the IQ loss at eight points.” This not only brings breaks down Bennett’s logic but questions his intentions. Though this fact is true and sounds very important Bennett is hoping that no one thinks about how his article is talking about the legalization of pot in America and New Zealand. This fact is completely unrepresentative of America’s pot smokers and does not help his point along. When looking at …show more content…
He states it by saying that “2.7 million Americans and older meet the clinical criteria for marijuana dependence or addiction.” The way he makes it sound is that 2.7 million is a ton of people, and it is, but when looking at the entire population of America which right now is 318.9 million. 2.7 million is not even one percent of the population. By not stating in a percent form he is hoping to trick his readers into believing 2.7 million is a large number. By doing so he is breaking down his logic by not making it clear to the reader the small percentage it is, and hoping the reader is not intuitive enough to look into the facts that Bennett gives

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Immigration Outline Research

    • 2804 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Throughout this paper, there will be the highly debatable discussion between legalizing medical marijuana and regular marijuana. Both sides of the argument have their pros and cons and there is an in depth description of both sides of the argument. At the end of the day though, the paper thoroughly supports the legalization of medical marijuana and marijuana in general. Medical marijuana less harmful than most other legal tobacco products and has the ability to reduce the pain within ailing people. Cannabis also can be a curable and more natural drug to help people in pain. Marijuana also has the potential to raise the U.S. out of their tough economic struggle as well as lower crime rate and create more jobs for many more people. On the other hand researchers believe that medical marijuana is still bad for people’s health and the government does not know how to regulate the production and sell of marijuana. Both sides have valid arguments, but the pros outweigh the cons by a significant amount. This paper has opinions of lots of credible sources, doctors and researchers explaining their side of the story. But read on to create your own personal opinion.…

    • 2804 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ("About marijuana," 2010). I hope to convince the reader as to why the legalization of marijuana would benefit society instead of criminalizing a natural substance that has been…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Stephen C. Webster’s article titled “White House admits marijuana has ‘some’ medical value” the opening line is a contradiction in itself. The Webster (2011) website states, “Days after the DEA insisted that marijuana has no medical value, the White House says there may actually be ‘some’ medical value to ‘individual component of the cannabis plant’ after all.” The DEA is supposed to be up to date with drug effects; but the White House says different, basically calling out the credibility of the DEA. Webster also goes on to say that smoking marijuana is harmful and has no medical value, in which he pulled from a report from the White House.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using facts to back this up, they inform us that studies have shown 30 percent of cigarettes users had become dependent on them, 20% of cocaine users became dependent, when marijuana only 10% of users become dependent. These facts really show you that marijuana is being grouped in the category of a drug you will become dependent, when in reality “marijuana is less addictive then coffee”.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the documentary, The Union: The Business Behind Getting High, the argument being made is that there was no reason for the prohibition of marijuana. It starts off by explaining how hemp, the cannabis plant, was used as such a reliable resource before it was illegal. Parts of hemp were used for food, paper, fuels, and fabric. This was not only a resource that was able to be expanded easily, but it was an overall better quality, and lasted longer. Many people, however, did not want to believe this. For example, one of the logical fallacies presented is that smoking marijuana makes you lose brain cells. The people who were for prohibition did not know what the experiment done even was. Scientists tested this theory on monkeys, and while it was told that only thirty joints were administered per day for a year, they actually pumped sixty-three colombian strength joints, without additional oxygen, through a gas mask within 5 minutes over three months. If it was not obvious, the masks literally suffocated the monkeys and the only reason their brain cells died is because that is the first thing to go when you are short on breath. The studies about how marijuana actually stimulates brain cells did not go over well either, and many other studies that were carelessly conducted, such as saying it causes lung cancer, were never proven.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Noel Merino Drugs

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Overall, the article “Research Shows That Marijuana Use is Safer Than Alcohol Use” proves to be a weak argument lacking in several criteria. The author over achieves in his use of logos by providing numerous sources and statistics, but greatly lacks any emotional appeal to hook the readers an…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the whole article, Stimson dedicates one sentences to the benefits of marijuana. He states that it has some palliative effects (Stimson 106). This makes marijuana’s benefits seem unimportant. However, this same concept cannot be said of when Stimson writes about the benefits of alcohol. He dedicates a whole paragraph to it, and while doing so, illustrates alcohol as a perfect drug. Therefore, when comparing marijuana and alcohol, marijuana is perceived far worse than it actually is. An unbiased author presents information from all sides which is what Stimson fails to do. He focused mainly on one side, and neglected the others. Furthermore, by failing to present equal amount of information from the opposing side, Stimson’s is…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to the question “should the Canadian government decriminalize the possession of marijuana?” Citizen One thinks that decriminalizing marijuana is a step in the wrong direction. She believes that there should be increasing penalties for marijuana possession and that the government should enforce harsher punishments and laws in relation to drugs. Citizen One thinks that if the government of Canada criminalizes the use and possession of what most youth consider as “weed,” then less lives would be destroyed. Marijuana is a drug which impairs a youth’s ability to recall, suppression of the immune system; and short-term responses including anxiety and panic. Hence, Citizen one believes that the negative aspects of the drug simply outweigh…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We the people in the US try to use reason and logic to determine our laws. as a consequence of this intellectual process, we develop graded scales for punishment and degrees of illegality. The more dangerous an activity the more illegal and higher punishment, lesser activities are either not illegal or endorsed. Marijuana illegality defies this rational thinking in that it is less detrimental than alcohol and cigarettes and yet is treated far worse. Most pharmaceutical drugs can kill if used improperly, like alcohol and tobacco. In the following essay, I will explain how medically prescribed marijuana has a beneficial effect on patients who suffer from certain diseases, both by treating disease symptoms and…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marijuana

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Earleywine, Mitchell. Understanding Marijuana: A New Look at the Scientific Evidence. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002. Print.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marijuana a Gateway Drug?

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first article claims first time marijuana usage could have impact on future substance abuse treatment and the earlier the person is who starts has the potential to contract HIV as well as have developmental challenges that would hinder finding a job. Whereas, the second article claims minimal hard drug usage after trying marijuana and the possibility that teens will begin to sniff glue once they realize the lies. While using statistics is a good way to get a fact-based point across, the creator tends to lean the stats in favor in order to make the point, as in the first article. In this case, the article is full of stats along with possible negative causes and effects of using marijuana for the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Alcohol differs from marijuana in several crucial respects,” claims Cully Stimson, a manager at the National Security Law Program. “First, marijuana is far more likely to cause addiction. Second, it is usually consumed to the point of intoxication. Third, it has no known general healthful properties”. Although Cully’s argument is believed by millions of people across the nation, what he’s saying turns out to be false. Due to advancement in technology, and the spread of communication through the Internet,…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They only did a research paper on 1000 people from Dunedin, New Zealand and the study followed subjects from ages 13-38 and they had dropped their IQ by 8. Also, it would lower it by anyone who smokes or if you are close to someone who is smoking then why are cigarettes legalized if they can also lower your IQ and they are more dangerous than marijuana. This doesn't mean anything, though since they only did it to those 1000 people from the same place they should've done this to people from different places since everyone is different that's why I think that it doesn't lower your IQ. His Logos was that marijuana leads to more violence and also it gets kids more addicting so I decided to go and do some research on places that had already legalized marijuana and see if it's true. Since its already legalized in Colorado one year into it being legalized marijuana actually had lower down the violent crimes, and also teen marijuana rates have actually dropped. So it would be better if they actually legalize it all over the world. His Pathos was that you can lose your job, their property, and also their freedom if you get caught with possession of marijuana. Why do they only do this for marijuana since they are worse things that are legalized just like alcohol and cigarettes these things are legalized and they have very high risks of death and marijuana hasn't had a case of someone dying from smoking marijuana as Dr. Alan Shackelford which she is a high profile, Harver trained Colorado physician who evaluates individuals for medical marijuana…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Szalavitz starts the article off by stating, “Researchers have also long noted a link between marijuana use and the chronic psychotic disorder, schizophrenia.”(Szalavitz 1) The reason this quote went so well with the research of the psychological disorders attributed to marijuana use is because she compares the two major disorders, psychosis and schizophrenia, so well by explaining how schizophrenia is just a chronic psychotic disorder. I found this article so valuable because she knows she is not a scientist but she is taking valid facts and using them in a way that doesn’t make any false assumptions but rather interesting results. For Example, Szalavitz quotes, “Studies have found that people with schizophrenia are about twice as likely to smoke pot as those who are unaffected. Conversely, data suggest that those who smoke cannabis are twice as likely to develop schizophrenia as nonsmokers.” (Szalavitz 2) The first part of this quote supports the above article by Verdoux, were Szalavitz states people with schizophrenia are about twice as likely to smoke pot as those who are unaffected, just as Verdoux made the point that people with psychosis are more likely to smoke pot as well. These two articles make it evident that people with a vulnerability to these two mental…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Massachusetts News. Bierson concludes that marijuana is harmful in many ways, including brain damage, damage to the reproductive system, and weakening of the immune system. He also attempts to convince the reader that marijuana is a "gateway drug" that leads the users to venture into much harder drugs. I believe that research to support anything can be found if one is looking hard enough, but that the fallacy of Bierson’s conclusion is due to his research seeking facts to support an already-assumed conclusion. Based on my research and my own personal experience, I have found that several of his points, when looked at logically, do not reach his conclusion.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays