Preview

Mckennon vs. Nashville Banner Publishing Company

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1366 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mckennon vs. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
` `

McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit

Case Analysis

Jorge A Montero

Carlos Arbizu University

Abstract:

This case analysis will covers the impact of the McKennon V. Nashville Banner Publishing Co Supreme Court Of The United States Decision in any legal dispute regulated by Age Discrimination In Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) and others regulation that covers the elimination of discrimination in the workplace, the contribution to payback calculation procedure in this type of legal suit, as well as impact in the workplace environment. The Court held in McKennon established that the employer is liable for its discriminatory actions even where it subsequently discovers evidence that would have led to the adverse action on lawful and legitimate grounds.

Statement of the problem:

Christine McKennon had been employed by the Nashville Banner Publishing Company (Banner) for nearly 30 years when she was terminated at the age of 62. According to the Banner, she was discharged as part of a work force reduction plan that was implemented to reduce costs. McKennon filed an ADEA action that alleged that her termination was due to her age. During a

deposition, McKennon testified that during her employment she had copied and removed from the Banner's headquarters several confidential financial documents out of concern for her job

security and for her "insurance" and "protection." . Thereafter, the Banner sent McKennon a letter informing her that the removal and copying of the records was in violation of her job responsibilities and "advising her (again) that she was terminated. The Banner also notified McKennon that had it known of this earlier misconduct it would have discharged her immediately.

For purposes of summary judgment, the Nashville Banner Publishing Co conceded its discrimination against McKennon,



References: • EEOC NOTICE, Number 915.002, 12-14-95 • McKennon v. Ashville Banner Publishing Company: Progression of the after –Acquired Evidence Doctrine, by Lauren L Logan • US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission website

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Does Ms. Baker have anything in writing at the time of her firing Ms. Attired?…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, while I agree that it is feasible that Bank of American did legally terminate Eileen based on their claims on management style incongruence, it appears that the Department of Labor made the correct decision in erroring in favor of Eileen. The fact that only twenty-one of 1,500 whistleblowers have gotten a favorable response from the Department of Labor evidences that the department acts diligently in these type of cases and that the decision in the Eileen Foster case was properly decided ("Eileen Foster, Countrywide and the Failure of Corporate Criminal Justice - Corporate Crime Reporter", 2012).…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Minchialamadonna

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "This is not news to her there are proceedings in a civil context commenced in December last year." Ms Carter said McPhee was no longer employed and so could not access other people's money and had been fully cooperative in civil proceedings launched by alleged victims. The court heard her assets including an apartment have been frozen as a result of the lawsuit and police have access to her bank accounts. "In no way has she moved away from the civil proceedings or the police proceedings," Ms Carter said. "She poses no risk to the community at large… she has no access to anyone else's money nor does she have access to her own money." The court heard her parents were willing to act as bail guarantors and have been supportive of their daughter throughout the investigations.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Melissa Kimball, the former client's mother, returned the Ombudsman telephone call former earlier this week. The Ombudsman has not been able to make contact with the Caitlyn's mother. The Ombudsman called Melissa Kimball's cellphone today, yet Ms. Melissa Kimball was not available to receive his incoming call. The Ombudsman provided Melissa Kimball with a voice message with his contact…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Case

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This was a case brought to action by Joanne Zippittelli against her employer, J.C. Penney Company. Her defense for creating case was that she was overlooked for the position in question due to her age. Zippittelli was one of four women who applied for the position with the company. All four women had the same job title and when they were interviewed by the Personnel Manager, he determined that there were three candidates including the plaintiff qualified for the position. Johnson then ranked the applicants, making the plaintiff his third choice (Twomey, pg. 537). After a consultation with Johnson’s supervisor, he hired his first choice, Patti Cruikshank. Zippittelli had a conversation with her supervisor, Anita Benko about how she was overlooked. Benko asked Zippittelli how old she was at which time Zippittelli responded she was 63. Benko made the statement that she would “probably not” get the position. After having this conversation with her supervisor Zippittelli was convinced her age was to blame for her lack of success within the company. Zippittelli filed a complaint with the EEOC and received a right-to-sue letter. The Age discrimination in Employment Act prohibits discrimination against any individual over the age of 40 with respect to “compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of an individual’s age (Twomey, pg. 538).…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monimed: Voluntary

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Legally the company did not have to share information with the employees. By law, MoniMed only had to share…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus 642 Week 2

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Page 50 1b. If there is no violation of law or regulation, the manager could have put herself in a position that caused her to be terminated from AutoCorp as well as losing her reputation. Autocorp could have face charges based upon the unethical decision that the manager made and if she used the confidential documents, Autocorp would have been faced with stealing the documents and using the unauthorized information to increase their budget.…

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation (KFC) is the franchisor of KFC restaurants. KFC’s registered trademarks and service marks include “Kentucky Fried Chicken,” “It’s Finger Lickin’ Good,” and the portrait of Colonel Harlan Sanders. KFC grants licenses to its franchisees to use these marks in connection with the preparations and sale of “Original Recipe Kentucky Fried Chicken.” Original Recipe Kentucky Fried Chicken, which is sold only by KFC franchisees, is prepared by a special cooking process featuring the use of a secret recipe seasoning known as “KFC Seasoning.” This blend of seasoning was developed by KFC’s founder, Colonel Harlan Sanders. As a condition of each franchise agreement, KFC requires that its franchisees use only KFC Seasoning in connection with the preparation and sale of Kentucky Fried Chicken.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff Vs Kodak

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages

    This is yet another case that concerns the standard for summary judgment in an antitrust controversy. The principal issue here is whether a defendant's lack of market power in the primary equipment market precludes — as a matter of law — the possibility of market power in derivative aftermarkets.…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law - Copyright

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kirtsaeng DBA Bluechristine99 v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Docket No. 11-697) 568 U.S. __ (2013).…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    While today motion pictures are generally considered an art form, it did not start out this way. The Supreme Court ruled in 1915 that free speech protection did not extend to motion pictures and was not overturned for almost 50 years (Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio). The silent era of Hollywood was considered by many to be immoral and perpetrating smut to the masses and the advent of sound only made people more worried. No system was in place to monitor what ended up on screen and the federal government was threatening to start censoring films themselves. These factors lead to the creation of The Motion Picture Production Code in 1930, Hollywood’s first attempt at self-regulating. It wasn’t until 1934 however when a man named Joe Breen was put in control of the new and extremely powerful Production Code Administration (PCA) which gave him the power to change and alter nearly every part of a film however he pleased. The Motion Picture Production Code, Joe Breen, and PCA had a large negative impact on how films portrayed a variety of subjects and American culture.…

    • 2556 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Polygraph Analysis

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shemika Terry, a clerk in the Oak Park treasurer’s office, was charged with embezzlement and using counterfeit money. Terry saw a delay in her court hearing when it was requested that she take a polygraph test. She was scheduled for a preliminary examination of evidence on Tuesday, June 28th, but requested the delay. According to court records, the defense attorney Jerome Barney was granted the adjournment to allow Terry to take a polygraph test regarding her charges.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Procedure: The jury first found for Mr. Faverty. Then Faverty filed suit against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s appealed.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example of issues facing the board of directors within the Kmart Corporation was from their former CEO, Joseph Conaway and former CFO, John McDonald who were pardoned on claims stating that they made misleading statements in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of the Kmart quarterly and annual reports. It was stated that the two had lead the corporation into bankruptcy while receiving $23 million dollars in compensation for only 20 months of work (Civil Enforcement, Securities, 2005).…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ageism

    • 776 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, or the A.D.E.A., was passed to protect workers forty years of age and older form being fired because of their age and replaced with younger workers who presumably would receive lower salaries. The Supreme Court strengthened federal protection against age discrimination in 1996, saying unanimously that such lawsuits can be successful even if an older worker is replaced by one who s older than forty years old. So, even if a firm unfairly fires a sixty five year old man to make way for a forty five year old, it is still age discrimination (Schaefer, 2004). It is said that prior to the enactment of the A.D.E.A., there was evidence of hiring discrimination against…

    • 776 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays