Preview

Marx vs. Weber: a Comparative Analysis

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1978 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx vs. Weber: a Comparative Analysis
Karl Marx v. Max Weber: Comparitive Analysis

C. Wright Mills places both Weber and Marx in the great tradition of what he calls the "sociological imagination" a quality that "enables us to grasp both history biography and the relationship between the two within society". (Mills, 12) In other words both theorists were dealing with the individual and society not either one to the exclusion of the other. Mills further writes that both Marx and Weber are in that tradition of sociological theorizing that leans towards sociology as "a theory of history,"(Mills, 30) sociology as (in this tradition) an encyclopedic endeavour, concerned with the whole of man 's social life. Thus these two giants of sociology have a considerable amount in common but how do they differ? Karl Marx and his sociological theories have proven invaluable to sociological thinkers throughout history, as many who followed would use Marxist theories as a foundation on which to build their own, including Max Weber. However, this is not to say that influential thinkers such as Weber did not develop their own theoretical practices and ideals regarding society and the individual, in fact, Weber 's work, though influenced by Marxist thought, would bring him to conclusions that differed greatly from that of Karl Marx. Max Weber, a Germany political economist would become a man later proclaimed as one of the "fathers of sociology" focused mostly on the influence of religion on society, however also wrote influential work in the fields of economics and politics, which had extremely large affects on his sociological theories. Though appreciative of Marx 's theoretical formulations, Weber also became highly critical of the Austrian thinker. Like Marx, Weber had a wide ranging set of interests: politics, history, language, religion, law, economics, and administration, in addition to sociology. His historical and economic analysis does not



Bibliography: Cuff, E.C., et al. Perspectives in Sociology. New York: Routledge Publishing, 1998. Gerth, H. et al. From Max Weber :Essays in Sociology. New York: Galaxy Books, 1946. Layder, Derek. Understanding Social Theory. London: Sage Publications, 1994. Marx, Karl. Selected Writings in Sociology & Social Philosophy. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964. Mills, C.W. The Sociological Imagination. London: Penquin Books, 1971. Weber, Max. Selections in Translation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978. Wright, E.O. et al. Max Weber 's Economy and Society: A Critical Companion. California: Standford University Press, 2005.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sociology 111 Quiz 1

    • 3511 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Karl Marx believed that ________ was the central force for social change while Max Weber believed that ________ was the force most responsible for social change.…

    • 3511 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Max Weber's observations and conclusions regarding modernity and its causes have named him one of the most influential sociologists of our era. Weber believed that in the West rationality had come to become the predominant impetus for action. Weber said that Rationality was one of four motivations towards actions--the remaining three, Traditional, Affective, and Value-Oriented, had been based on more humanistic qualities and had all faded into almost insignificance in the modern age. He thought that this change in stimulus had led to men becoming dehumanised, trapped in the 'iron cage' of production and bureaucracy. Weber's writings sought to understand why Capitalism had come to predominate in the West, rather than other parts of the world, and to examine the different aspects of such a society. Weber argued that sociology was inevitably a subjective science that was dominated by the importance of the individual; this belief led him to employ very unique methods of analysis.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classic sociologist Max Weber was strongly influenced by Marx's ideas, but rejected the possibility of effective communism, arguing that it would require an even greater level of detrimental social control and bureaucratization than capitalist society. Weber developed the three-component theory of stratification and the concept of life chances. Weber supposed there were more class divisions than Marx suggested, taking different concepts from both functionalist and Marxist theories to create his own system. Weber claimed there are four main classes: the upper class, the white-collar workers, the petite bourgeoisie, and the manual working class. Weber's theory more closely resembles theories of modern Western class structures embraced by sociologists, although economic status does not seem to depend strictly on earnings in the way Weber envisioned.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead they argue that social stratification benefits some at the expense of others. Two theorists, Karl Marx and Max Weber, are the primary contributors to this perception. Karl Marx was a German philosopher, sociologist, economist, and revolutionary socialist (Biography). He based his theory on the idea that society has two classes of people: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie are the holders of the means of manufacturing, like factories and mills, while the proletariat are the workers. Marx argued that the bourgeoisie give proletariats just enough pay to survive, but ultimately the workers are exploited (Plummer).…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also had influences that shaped the way in he thought of and saw the world one of them being Marx because he always found ways to either agree or disagree with Marx’s theories, an instance of this is when both theorists are arguing about class. Similar to Marx, Weber saw class as economically determined. He believed society was split between owners and laborers. Status, on the other hand, was based on noneconomic factors such as education, connection, and religion. Both status and class determined an individual’s power, or influence over concepts. Unlike Marx, Weber thought that these individuals understanding of one another and the world they formed the base of a stable society. For weber a rational society is one built around logic and efficiency rather than morality or tradition. To Weber, capitalism is entirely rational. Although this leads to productivity and merit-based success, it can have adverse effects when taken to the extreme. Weber was also unlike his predecessors was more interested in how individuals experienced societal divisions than in the…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    C. Wright Mills, the radical Columbia University sociologist who died 50 years ago (March 20, 1962), has been defined by some as the pioneer of the new radical sociology that emerged in the 1950s, in which his book, The Sociological Imagination (1959), has played a crucial role (Restivo 1991, p.61). Mills was a meticulous researcher and his writing combined outrage and analysis, but he did not wanted to be what he called a "sociological bookkeeper". Moreover, C. Wright Mills argued that perhaps the most helpful distinction with which the sociological imagination works is between personal troubles and public issues. Here we can focus on how he is connecting the social, personal, and historical dimensions of our lives and understand what is the difference between ‘personal troubles’ and ‘public issues’ and how it is related.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Max Weber

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Max Weber, a German economist and sociologist is considered to be one of the most significant classical theorists because his methods that are still being implemented into modern sociological research. Weber is best known for his essay, The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism, as well as being highly regarded for his ideas on bureaucracy, his study on class, status and party, and for his theory of social action., Almost all of Weber's writing's have had some kind, if not, a major impact on modern sociology.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1)Tony Bilton,Kevin Bonnett,Pip Jones,Tony Lawson, David Skinner, Michelle Stanworth, Andrew Webster(2002). Introductory Sociology, 4th edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this paper is to critically analyze Durham’s theory in influencing the sociology of work. The paper shall uncover and explain Durkheim’s system theory and then analyze its relevance to sociology of work. Various examples of work places shall be included to add more clarity and to consolidate its arguments. The conclusion shall then sum up all the points that would have been discussed so as to come up with a standpoint.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Max Weber, Verstehen

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Weber’s thoughts differ from both Marx and Durkheim. His approach to society was much more individualistic. Durkheim looked at society to explain phenomenon, and how everything had a function and institutions worked together and influenced society. Weber took the approach that individual human social interactions were the real cause of society. He did not ignore the collective mind, quite the contrary; he focused on how people’s actions were shaped by society. He was interested in how the forces of society change social interactions between the individuals. Weber distinguished himself from Marx because he didn’t abide by the same principles of materialism that Marx did. Marx believed that the material world shapes the way we think as humans. Weber takes an approach that believes in materialism but also incorporates some elements of idealism. He believed that although the material world can influence ideas, the reverse is also true. This lack of conformity to a strict set of rules runs through many of Weber’s views.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Transformation of work

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Braveman (1974) argued that managers unceasingly in charge of the work processes that could affect the profitability…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ability Grouping

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ability grouping is grouping students according to their ability. The practice of grouping student according to their level of academic skills allows a teacher to provide a uniform level of instruction to an entire group.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Max Weber

    • 907 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Weber believed that actions of individuals are what form society and the basis of sociology. Humans are aware of their surroundings and naturaly create different situations.…

    • 907 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics