Preview

Marketing Myopia Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marketing Myopia Summary
Marketing Myopia
In his article Marketing Myopia, Theodore Levitt insists that failure in industries is “at the top” where executives deal with broad goals and policies. He defines marketing myopia using something he calls the “self-deceiving cycle.” This cycle consists of four conditions which cause companies to stop growing: the belief that growth is secure, overconfidence on their own products, too much focus on mass production, and preoccupation with manufacturing efficiency.
The first condition in the cycle is the belief that growth is secured by an increasing and more prosperous population. A market expansion keeps companies from thinking imaginatively. Levitt names the petroleum business as a disturbing example to show that if your product has an automatically expanding market, then you will not engage into a creative thinking on how to expand it. As Levitts quotes “the petroleum business is a distressing example of how complacency and wrongheadedness can stubbornly convert opportunity into near disaster.”
A second condition is the belief that there is no competitive substitute for the industry’s major product. To sustain this idea, the author mentions major industries in which growth has been affected or is in danger of being affected because of companies believing their products were “unchallenging superior”. Grocery stores, dry cleaning, and electric utilities are among the industries Levitt mentions, have come under a shadow for being wrongly positioned. However, Levitt’s richest example is why the railroads have stopped growing. It wasn’t because of the need for passengers but “because the need was not filled by the railroads themselves.”
Another condition is too much reliance in mass production and in the benefits of lowering unit costs as output increases. All Industries’ efforts are directed to production and selling while marketing, a more complex process gets ignored. To make his point, the author explains the difference between marketing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marketing is a function within in a business that has become increasingly important over the years. Long before the growth of the web , it was essential for businesses , if they were to compete successfully , to think about how their products would meet the needs of the people who might buy them. If they failed to do this , people would stop buying the products.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MKT301 review

    • 3638 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Failure to recognize the scope of the business can keep it from future growth. This is product oriented businesses rather than customer oriented businesses.…

    • 3638 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, the author’s personal definition of marketing as well three definitions from different sources are provided. The author also explains the importance of marketing in organizational success. Lastly the author provides three examples from the business world to support her explanation.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout this paper marketing will be defined and discussed using a personal definition and at least two others from two different resources. Based on these definitions, an explanation of the importance of marketing in success of an organization will follow. Next, there will be three examples from the business world to support the explanations. Finally, how the businesses used marketing for success will be discussed followed by a conclusion.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sport Marketing

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The notion of "marketing myopia" has haunted marketers since Theodore Levitt published his famous article "Marketing Myopia" in Harvard Business Review in 1960. Levitt argues that companies which narrowly focus on the product to the detriment of customer requirements (i.e., dispensing with the marketing concept) suffer from marketing myopia. Myopia or shortsightedness is often apparent within organizations. Several types of marketing myopia can be identified including classic myopia, competitive myopia and efficiency myopia. Companies displaying one of these three elements are clearly distinguishable from innovative firms which embrace the marketing concept in practice and which have a much broader scope than is required for a single business sector. In order to overcome myopia and become innovative, the following is recommended:…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Theodore Levitt 's article, "Marketing Myopia" (1975), the concept of marketing was widened by examining the history of failed industries doomed to fail eventually. Industries failed to continue their growth not because of a saturated market but failure of proper management. They did not realize the need of expanding into areas in which they were already familiar. Levitt used the railroads as an example because railroads were not focusing on other modes of transportation such as cars and planes, and ships. The railroads only wanted to think of rail transport.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Entrepreneurial Growth

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since growth is not a given, we will also look at the challenges that threaten the viability of firms that have escaped the launch pad and those that have been in existence for some time. A crucial part of our analysis will be to better understand how managers can anticipate and respond to the reaction of competitors to their growth strategies.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary concern or objective of marketing is to identify and satisfy, or exceed the changing needs of customers. In view of this broad concern of marketing, it can be seen that the concept of marketing summarizes many activities in a business. Marketing, in fact, refers to any activity undertaken by a firm that has been designed to plan, price, promote and distribute ideas, goods and services to target markets. These marketing activities were executed in order to create an exchange and sales that will result in the achievement of the proprietors' individual goals and the firm's goals, both in the short-term and the long-term. It is then obvious that marketing forms an integral component of any business's operations.…

    • 765 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch1 Strategic compensation

    • 1934 Words
    • 11 Pages

    1) What is the primary factor that will prevent companies from growing in the next decade?…

    • 1934 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hypercomepetition

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    says. "But I found that successful companies were not doing any of these things. The best performers were disrupting markets,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jones, RonaldW. and PeterB. Kenen (1984), Handbookof International Economics.Amsterdam: North-Holland. Keller, Mary Ann (1993), Collision: GM, Toyota,Volkswagen and the Race to Own the 21st Century. New York:CurrencyDoubleday. Knight,FrankH. (1936), "ThePlace of MarginalEconomics in Socialist Calculation,"American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings,26, 255-66. J. Orientation: Kohli,Ajay K. andBernard Jaworski(1990), "Market The Construct,ResearchPropositions,and ManagerialImplications,"Journalof Marketing,54 (April), 1-18. Kuhn, William E. (1970), The Evolution of Economic Thought. Cincinnati:South-Western PublishingCo. Is Lavin, Douglas (1994), "Chrysler Now Lowest-CostProducerin Auto Industry, Harbour ReportSays," WallStreetJournal (June 23), B3. Lavoie, Don (1985), Rivalry and Central Planning. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress. Robert(1959), A Historyof EconomicIdeas. New York: Lekachman, Harper. Bell Lippman,S.A. and R.P.Rumelt(1982), "Uncertain Imitability," Journalof Economics, 13, 418-38. Marwell,Geraldand RuthE. Ames (1981), "EconomistsFree Ride: Does Anyone Else?"Journalof Public Economics, 15, 295-310. McGee, J.S. (1975), "Efficiencyand Economies of Size," in Industrial Concentration:The New Learning,H. Goldschmid,H.M. Mann,and J.F Weston,eds. Boston:Little, Brown,55-105. and William M. Pride McKee, Daryl O., P. Rajan Varadarajan, A (1989), "StrategicAdaptabilityand Firm Performance: Market-ContingentPerspective,"Journal of Marketing,53 (July), 21-35. HarvardBusinessReMintzberg, Henry(1987), "Crafting Strategy," view (July-August),66-75. C.A. and Michael E. Porter(1991), Strategy:Seeking Montgomery, and SecuringCompetitive Business Advantage.Boston: Harvard School Publishing. Morgan,RobertM. and Shelby D. Hunt(1994), "TheCommitmentTrustTheory of RelationshipMarketing," Journalof Marketing, 58 (July), 20-38. Narver,JohnC. and StanleyF. Slater(1990), "TheEffect of Market Orientation Business Profitability," on Journal of Marketing,54 (October),20-35. Atul, Jagdish N. Sheth, and F. Brown Whittington,Jr. Parvatiyar, (1992), "ParadigmShift in InterfirmMarketingRelationships: EmergingResearchIssues,"workingpaper,EmoryUniversity. A. of Peteraf,Margaret (1993), "TheCornerstones Competitive Advantage:A Resource-BasedView,"StrategicManagementJournal, 14 (3), 179-91. Porter,Michael E. (1980), Competitive Advantage.New York:The Free Press. (1985), Competitive Strategy.New York:The Free Press. (1990), The CompetitiveAdvantage of Nations. New York:The Free Press. a Strate(1991), "Towards DynamicTheoryof Strategy," gic Management Journal, 12, 95-117. C.K. and Gary Hamel (1990), "TheCore Competenceof Prahalad, the Corporation," HarvardBusiness Review(May-June),79-91. Reed, Richardand RobertJ. DeFillippi (1990), "CausalAmbiguity, Barriersto Imitation,and SustainableCompetitiveAdvantage," 88-117. Academyof Management Review, 15 (January), JaimeA., RobertL. PhillipsandPeterA. Westfall(1994), Roquebert, "Markets Versus Management: What 'Drives ' Profitability," workingpaper,TexasTech University.…

    • 11943 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marketing Myopia

    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In line with Levitt (1960), Marketing Myopia refers to the narrow view of myopia, marketing and business environment. This kind of advertising program without any demand with clients but an organization will is to sell goods or services within particular economic markets. It tilted a business to focus on its desire, rather than what the shopping desires, and often modifying to form a culture of immunity each typically end up losing the name, business damage and ineffective commercial practice Levitt, (1960). This is accomplished exploring by them, an enterprise may appear an extra fully meet customer needs and wants, in order to develop its business. It offers a brilliant view of thoughts for your customers. At "Marketing Myopia," Levitt (1960), he indicates the current marking statement said: "Marketing is a stepson" most of the organizations stressed production and marketing.…

    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marketing Myopia

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marketing Myopia is narrow minded approach to a marketing situation where only short-range goals are considered or Where the marketing focuses on only one aspect out of many possible marketing attributes…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article raises the issue of revenue growth stalls that affect even the most successful companies. The article focuses on four major causes of the crisis. The first cause is the premium-position captivity that is”the inability of a firm to respond effectively to new, low-cost competitive challenge or to a significant shift in customer valuation of product features” (p.54). The second reason is the innovation management breakdown that is”some chronic problem in managing the internal business process for updating existing product and services and creating new one” (p.56). Third reason is the premature core abandonment that means “the failure to fully exploit growth opportunities in the existing core business” and “acquisitions of growth initiatives in areas relatively distant from existing customers, products, and channels”(p.56). Finally, the fourth cause is the talent bench shortfall that is “a lack of leaders and staff with the skills and capabilities required for strategy execution” (p.58). Authors emphasize that these causes are mainly within management control since they result from “a choice about strategy or organizational design” (p.54).…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays