Preview

Machiavelli's Il Principe Or The Prince

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's Il Principe Or The Prince
Renaissance Italy was a world of contradictions. Amidst all the innovation for which it is remembered, Italy was in political turmoil. Within Niccolo Machiavelli’s life alone, there were multiple invasions as well as internal conflicts and political unrest. Machiavelli was Head of the Militia during a brief period when Florence was a republic, free of Medici family rule, but when they returned to power in the early 16th century, Machiavelli was tortured, imprisoned, and internally exiled. It was during this time that he wrote his famous Il Principe, or The Prince. In it, Machiavelli covers many notable topics, such as fortune. The idea of fortune was used by the ancient Romans to explain things outside of human agency and free will. Though …show more content…
He does not specify right away whether he believes this to be true, but rather states at the beginning of Chapter 25 how “many persons” believe that “the things of the world are governed by fortune and by God” and no matter what they do, men “cannot correct them” and “have no remedy for them whatsoever” (pg. 117). At the time, it was not uncommon to believe that human lives and destinies were completely in the hands of fortune and God, completely out of the reach. According to Machiavelli, this belief is widespread because of “the great variety of things that have been seen” which are “beyond all human conjecture” (pg. 117). Machiavelli is alluding to miracles here, implying that fortune operates on a higher level in a god-like way. He also implies that fortune is equal to chance by speculating how a person might live if they believed in this version of fortune. He states that a person who lives under the belief of fortune as an unconquerable force “might judge that there would be no point in sweating much” and “let themselves be governed by chance.” They resign themselves to chance, living as if there is no other option but to accept what fortune brings, because to them, fortune is the highest authority of their …show more content…
He says fortune “is the arbiter of half of our actions,” which he believes is essential “so that our free will may not be eliminated.” Fortune cannot have full control, in his opinion, if man is to have any free will. He compares fortune to “ruinous rivers” because of the way “each person flees before them” and “surrenders to their attack” without being able to “block them at any point.” This idea of fortune as a powerful force that renders man helpless fits the initial definition. Machiavelli then brings dikes into the analogy to fit his view of fortune as “arbiter of half,” showing power “where virtue is not prepared to resist her,” in places “where she knows that embankments and dikes have not been made to hold her.” Through his description, Machiavelli argues that when one is prepared, fortune is less
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Assess the historical significance of Machiavelli's writing of 'The Prince" during the Renaissance period
    • 1337 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess the historical significance of Machiavelli's writing of 'The Prince" during the Renaissance period

    Machiavelli was born in Florence, Italy at a time when the country was in political upheaval. Italy was divided between four dominant city-states, and each of these was continually at the mercy of the stronger foreign governments of Europe. He was once a roving ambassador and diplomat for the Florentine Republic and thus spent time with many of the major Italian leaders of the day. During the period from 1469 to 1492 when Florence was under the control of Lorenzo de Medici the economy expanded significantly and the lower class enjoyed a greater level of comfort and protection. 'In 1512 the Medici overthrew the Florentine republic, returning to power with the help of the papal army and that of Spain. Following the discovery of a plot, of which he was innocent, against the Medici patriarchs, Machiavelli was forced into exile on his country estate.' It was later Machiavelli wrote the Prince, a guidebook for a ruler that would eventually unite Italy to drive out foreign threats. It illustrated the ways in which al leader follows the guidelines of what he believed to be a good political life as a leader. This book gives a general overview of human behaviour, hoping that future princes can establish…

    • 1337 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brunelleschi And Giotto Research Paper
    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Brunelleschi And Giotto Research Paper

    People who wanted fame and power in this new world of humanism and self-righteousness had to deserve it. No longer did a supreme authority, such as the pope, appoint officials and leaders. The authority rested in the hands of the person willing to take charge. This approach to gaining wealth and power can be described as Machivellian, named so by the influence of ideologist Niccolo Machiavelli. Machiavelli wrote one of the most influential political books of all time, called the Prince, which is considered the most lasting work on Italian Renaissance. In his novel, Machiavelli writes of " cruelty, well used or badly used," and warns the compassionate and humanistic prince "not to make bad use of this compassion".(Burke p.196) Machiavelli expanded on his belief in the Prince, that Italians should behave with ferocity when it comes to politics, and should back up that ferocity with a unified force. Machiavelli's principles have had a profound effect on the way Europe and the rest of the world have viewed politics over centuries, and truly show the Rennaissance's uncanny trait of promoting individualism and social Darwinism.<br><br>The Italian Renaissance has made a major impact on the rest of Europe, leaving an intellectual and artistic heritage that…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's Influence On The Prince

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 Allusion to Machiavelli
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fahrenheit 451 Allusion to Machiavelli

    Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian historian, politician, diplomat, and philosopher during the late 1400s early 1500s. Machiavelli is considered the father of modern political theory; and his theories are most prominent in his short book, “The Prince”. Machiavelli’s “The Prince” is main purpose is to tell rulers how to remain in power once they have gained it. The best way to go about ruling according to Machiavelli is to simply rule well. However if this does not work Machiavelli recommends several different strategies such as the use of violence. During Machiavelli’s time his theories were not widely accepted and because of this he died in shame. Machiavelli acted on his thoughts and beliefs despite what society taught and believed. However once time passed Machiavelli’s philosophies were better understood and accepted. Other philosophers began take portions of his philosophy to add to their own. This brought upon a new respected look to Machiavelli rather than the shameful look he died with.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Machiavelli Contribute To Government
    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Machiavelli Contribute To Government

    His writings are maddeningly and notoriously unsystematic, inconsistent and sometimes self-contradictory. He tends to appeal to experience and example in the place of rigorous logical analysis. Yet succeeding thinkers who more easily qualify as philosophers of the first rank did (and do) feel compelled to engage with his ideas, either to dispute them or to incorporate his insights into their own teachings. Machiavelli may have grazed at the fringes of philosophy, but the impact of his musings has been widespread and lasting. The terms “Machiavellian” or “Machiavellism” find regular purchase among philosophers concerned with a range of ethical, political, and psychological phenomena, even if Machiavelli did not invent “Machiavellism” and may not even have been a “Machiavellian” in the sense often ascribed to him.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper
    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper

    Machiavelli thought human nature was two-dimensional. He saw humans as predictable, foreseeing their responses to the princes’ actions. Because humans are so unsophisticated in Machiavelli’s eye, they can only love or hate their prince, making them unable to see an intermediate to the good and bad in their ruler. Humans’…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione
    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Compare And Contrast Lao Tzu And Machiavelli
    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Lao Tzu And Machiavelli

    Machiavelli believed in the idea of a strong leader. The leader should be feared more than he is loved, if he is even loved at all. A leader shouldn 't be hated, a hated leader will be rebelled and possibly killed, but a leader can not be loved at all. He believes that if a leader is loved, he wouldn 't be feared and no one will listen to him or what he wants to do. Machiavelli believed that war was needed and a nation should keep a strong military at all times. War shouldn 't be high on taxes though, because taxes have a possibility to cause a rebellion. A rebellion is an act of hatred and could possibly lead to death of the…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Prince/Man of All Seasons: Ethics
    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Prince/Man of All Seasons: Ethics

    Machiavelli believes that a Prince should break his promises to man because man is evil and will break his promises to the Prince. I believe this theory to be true. If one desires to be a successful Prince, one must be able to understand and accept that evil characteristics are in all men. I also believe in order to be successful, it is necessary to take into account the fact that one may have to arouse fear in ones people in order to preserve and keep them well off. At times it may be necessary that those who hold power are the ones who are most inhumane; if this is held with low regard, one may bring collapse to their people, and unto oneself. However, as someone in power, one cannot be so merciless as to alienate ones people. There is a balance that must be kept. There may be certain situations where one feels a compelling need to lie and be deceitful; however, as a general rule, to maintain credibility one be trustworthy and loyal whenever possible. As a Prince, one must come off as moral and self-sacrificing but know at times that might not be the case. Machiavelli knows that for a Prince to be successful, his people have to be loyal and respectful. If one gains the respect of his people, both aspects will be successful and benefit…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince
    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Renaissance Change Over Time
    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Did Renaissance Change Over Time

    Machiavelli wrote and studied the change in political beliefs in France and Italy. Machiavelli was a descendant from Florence like Dante but Machiavelli came from a different political climate. Florence had changed many times since Dante’s oligarchy succumbed to the power of rich Signori who gained control of the councils of government. The Signori passed laws that had the upper classes fight to take away power from the lower classes. Slowly the oligarchy became a monarchy with fake republics to be able to give the people a place to air their grievances.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber
    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli rhetorical analysis
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli rhetorical analysis

    To give his advice structure, Machiavelli used an abundance of historical references. One leader he refers to is Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan. Sforza fought and won power as a Duke, he passed that power on to his sons. His sons avoided war and lost power. This a great story to persuade the reader to think that the advice Machiavelli is giving should be taken. His message is that if a prince is not willing to fight, as Sforza's sons were not, they too may lose power. Machiavelli stresses the point that it is better to be feared than loved. A perfect comparison of the two sides is Hannibal and Scipio. Machiavelli…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: a Cynic?
    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli: a Cynic?

    Many writings argue that human kind is born capable of evil things or that they are born either good or evil. Machiavelli argues simply that man is self-centered and only after self preservation. He argues that mankind is immoral and greedy. His opinions are apparent as he states, "It may be said of men in general that they are ungrateful, voluble, dissemblers, anxious to avoid danger, and covetous of gain," in the eighteenth paragraph of The Prince. These thoughts and views have gained him the title of a cynic. More than a cynic however, Machiavelli is but a realist.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    In addition, one of the main points that Machiavelli pushes through out his book is the use of force and fear. It is noted that force is a great way for a Prince to become "strong, secure, and respected"; and he links this force with the devastation that he talks about in seizing and securing a state. Another strong point to give in this argument against Machiavelli wanting a just ruler is the fact that he writes about a Prince seizing a state with "evil means"; he writes that "cruelty can be used well" and gives examples of rulers who had done so previously, and also that if a ruler uses evil means in his acquisition of a state they must decide how much injury or evil they wish to inflict. Machiavelli feels as though in seizing a state cruel acts are a must at first to get the people under control, but eventually he feels the people will forget, and forgive and understand why the acts committed were done. The last point to note is that Machiavelli says that a Prince does not need to be moral or ethical but virtuous and wise; a virtuous and wise prince will be able to keep the population in control, keep the military controlled, and by being virtuous and wise he able to do good for…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics