With responses from a sample of 166 business executives from a broad mix of companies of various sizes and industries, this 2004 baseline study on corporate social responsibility in the Philippines is the first and the most comprehensive research investigation of the CSR practice in the country in terms of scope and approach to societal impact management (SIM).
Regardless of the size of their company, business executives in the Philippines see corporate citizenship as a fundamental part of business. Most company managers say they view corporate citizenship as central to good business practice. 82 per cent of executives surveyed say that good corporate citizenship helps the bottom line. 59 per cent say these practices improve the image and reputation of the company, while 53 per cent say corporate citizenship is important to their customers. The findings in this report provide a baseline portrait of executives’ perceptions of the state of corporate citizenship in the Philippines in 2004 and a solid basis to track its evolution over time. The author’s intent is to revisit the topic biennially, with scheduled follow-up planned for 2006.
Statement of the problem
The study on the current status of corporate citizenship in the Philippines seeks to establish a baseline of the CSR motivations, extent of implementation, obstacles and expectations among the micro, small, medium and large enterprises in the country. Specifically, the study will seek answers to the following questions: (1) What is the emerging view of CSR among business organisations with regard to: 1. good corporate citizenship
2. business case for CSR
3. public expectations
4. issues where they believe businesses should play an active role? (2) To what extent do the following factors drive the respondents’ CSR efforts: 1. community expectations
2. company traditions and values
3. business strategy Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics 12 th
28–30 September 2005, Adelaide
4. recruitment and retention of employees
5. consumer/customer satisfaction
6. laws and political pressures
7. concern for corporate image/reputation?
(3) What are the barriers, both internal and external, that are encountered by the companies in the pursuit of their CSR agenda?
(4) What is the extent of the companies’ involvement along the following CSR areas: 1. social investment
2. corporate–community partnership
3. environmental stewardship
4. managing workplace concerns?
(5) To what extent have companies integrated CSR into their strategic business practice in terms of the following:
2. policy setting
3. program development
4. systems installation
5. monitoring and reporting?
(6) Is there a significant relationship between the extent of CSR involvement among companies and company size and industry classification?
(7) Is there a significant relationship between the extent of CSR integration among companies and company size and industry classification?
The study revolves around a baseline approach to the societal impact management of Philippine business or, in other words, an overview of how socially responsible Philippine business is. In the center of this framework is the firm, which has two important and basic components that are tested, namely: (1) the extent of its CSR involvement in areas such as social investment, environmental stewardship, issues in the workplace, and partnership with the community; and (2) the extent of the CSR integration in terms of the following: leadership, policy, programs, systems and reporting.
Significant to the methodical assessment of SIM is an appreciation of four independent variables: (1) drivers or accelerators of CSR; (2) barriers to the practice of CSR; (3) emerging views of CSR; and (4) the profile of the company based on size, industry classification and...
References: Brinkman, J (2003) Does corporate social responsibility lead to improved financial
performance? An analysis of the electric utility industry
Carroll, AB (1979) ‘A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy
of Management Review, ProQuest database, accessed 8 July 2004
Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College (2003) The state of corporate citizenship in
the United States: 2003, http://www.bc.edu/centers/ccc/, accessed 28 April
2004.Clarkson, MBE (1995) ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating
corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review, ProQuest database,
accessed 17 May 2004.
Dunlap, WP (2000) ‘Canonical correlation and chi-square: relationships and interpretation’,
Journal of General Psychology, ProQuest database, accessed 17 May 2004.
Francois, R and Amstrong, A (2003) ‘Ethics as a risk management strategy: the Australian
experience’, Journal of Business Ethics, ProQuest database, accessed 13 June 2004.
Freeman, RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Pitman Publishing
Friedman, M (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, New York
Times Magazine, 13 September, p 32ff.
Ganchero, EG (2004) ‘Benchmarking corporate citizenship practice in the Philippines’, DLS
Journal of Business and Management, vol 1, no 1, pp 33–43.
Harrison, JS and Freeman, RE (1999) ‘Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance:
Horvath, DJ (2004) ‘Competitive strategies of the future: can corporate social responsibility and
the bottom-line work together?’ Unpublished paper presented at DSL-PSI Graduate
School of Business RCBC Campus, Makati City, 25 October.
Interactions (2005) Research Symposium on the State of Corporate Citizenship in the
Philippines, 22 January (unpublished).
Itkonen, Laura (2003) ‘Corporate social responsibility and financial performance’, Academy of
Management Journal, Proquest database, accessed 28 April 2004.
Maximiano, JM (2003) Corporate social responsibility: basic principles and best practices:
historico-philosophical issues in international business, PLDT/ACM, Manila.
Orlitzky, M (2001) ‘Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social
Orlitzsky, M, Schmidt, FL and Rynes, SL (2003) ‘Corporate social and financial performance: a
meta-analysis’, Organization Studies, ProQuest database, accessed 8 July 2004
Oxford Research (2003) Survey and analysis of tools in connection with CSR and sustainability,
Danish Confederation of Trade Unions, Copenhagen, http://www.lo.dk, accessed 8
Pasamonte, JN (2005) ‘A critique on methodology’, Research Symposium on the State of
Corporate Citizenship in thePhilippines, 22 January.
Phillips, R (2003) Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics, Berrett-Koehler Publisher, San
Raynard, P and Forstater, M (2002) Corporate social responsibility: implications for small and
Simon, H (1997) Administrative behavior, The Free Press, New York
Taskforce on the Churches and Corporate Responsibility (2000) Bench marks for measuring
business performance: corporate social and environmental responsibility −
Waddock, SA and Graves, SB (1997) ’The corporate social performance–financial performance
link’, Strategic Management Journal, ProQuest database, accessed 28 April 2004
Wood, DJ (1991) ‘Corporate social performance revisited’, Academy of Management Review,
ProQuest database, accessed 28 April 2004.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document