Preview

Social Responsibility Of A Business Is To Make A Profit Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Responsibility Of A Business Is To Make A Profit Analysis
It is obvious to many that the goal of a company is to make a profit. According to Milton Friedman, what many businesses do not say is that this is their only responsibility and that it is to make the highest profit possible. As members of society, we should be concerned that these decisions will have affect us. I believe that a business has the responsibility to make a profit, but it has many others as well. A business not only has to make a profit but think about the long term affects such as their employees and other stakeholders. Throughout this paper there will be many views that Friedman may not have been thought about before. To begin, I will describe why Friedman the writer of “Social Responsibility of a Business is to Make a Profit” had a off set view on business, followed by a better representation of the social responsibility of a business as a whole. Friedman believes that the only goal of a …show more content…
There are many people that still believe in the foundation Friedman set decades ago. Some may believe stakeholders are not part of the business. They will try to claim that the business is just the CEOs or maybe just the owners. Many view the business as just those who work there, leaving out some stakeholders but not all. Either way it seems that they cannot completely dispose the theory that a business is not just CEOs.
At the point where they start to include the owners they would already be defying their original statement of it being solely CEOs that make up the business. Some may still try to claim stakeholders are not part of a business, but we can both agree that they influence the business, so all are indirectly related. If it is believed that all stakeholders are not part of a business, but just employees we still can make a conclusion. That is, if employees and owners should be a part then they have already destroyed their original argument refusing their conclusion in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 1101 Unit 4 Business

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The text defines stakeholders as: “Individuals and organizations who are actively involved in the organization or whose interests may be positively or negatively affected by what the organization does.” Every organization has stakeholders.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Al Dunpal Case Study

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I completely disagree with Dunlap’s statement. Although shareholders are owners of the company who have “paid” for their stake, stakeholders do play a key role in an organization. In essence, shareholders are stakeholders. According to Kim in Corporate Governance (p. 166) although the primary goal of a firm is to create wealth for the shareholders many believe companies should a have a greater responsibility to society – stakeholders. I agree with this perspective. Every decision Dunlap made as a CEO affected not only the shareholders but also affected the needs and interests of the stakeholders in the company. In the short-term, shareholders profited from the company wide staff cuts and savings but Dunlap sacrificed Sunbeam’s culture and morale of its employees. In the long-term, the company suffered. During Dunlap’s tenure, many employees were let go…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The stakeholders in a business can be a person, group or organisation that has an influence in an organisation. All stakeholders are not the same, they all have their differences.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stakeholders are the shareholders because they maximize the value of the company. Carol Tempest who is the VP of Human Resources is also a stakeholder as well as Ana who is the Director of Sales. Gayle Dornier who is an employee, Bill Witherspoon who is the…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stakeholders: Large Firms

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike shareholders who are solely interested in return dividends and share price growth, stakeholders have wide variety of interests in how companies operate. Freeman (1984) stated that stakeholders are, “any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization’s objectives”. The main objective for firms is profit maximization and for this reason I agree to a certain extent that large corporations abuse their power against stakeholders.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Temple University Stadium

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Other theories would count managers as stakeholders only if they held stock in the company (Carroll 98). Still others identify a class of “core stakeholders” who are essential for the survival of an organization and vital to its success (Carroll 88). Such distinctions aside, what is clear is that Leadership has a very big stake in the stadium…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    guide reading

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedman argues that the objective of a corporation is to maximize the profits within the guidelines of the law in the free and open society. If the corporate executive has a “social responsibility”, which means his is to act that is not in the interest of his employers.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Chiquita Banana

    • 3067 Words
    • 13 Pages

    What is the responsibility of a business or corporation? Is it to meet stakeholder expectations and follow legal guidelines, or is there a higher responsibility? While Milton Friedman asserted in his famous essay that “the social responsibility of a business is to increase profits,” it can be argued that companies also have higher moral responsibilities. The question in each ethical dilemma is, “To whom do we have a moral responsibility?”…

    • 3067 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milton Friedman and others have argued that a corporation 's purpose is to maximize returns to its shareholders, and that since only people can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to society. (Freeman,…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freeman vs Friedman

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milton Friedman’s article went into grave detail the social responsibilities of an individual vs. the social responsibilities of a business. He also explained the duties of the businessman: legislator, executive, and the jurist. He couldn’t understand how some businessman could be so “clear headed” regarding matters internal to their business but so “muddle headed” in matters outside their business in matters critical to their business’s survival. According to Friedman, there is one social responsibility for a business “engage in open and free competition without deception or fraud.” My personal reaction to this article was that it was very difficult to read and comprehend. I had to reread the article and several sections of it several times to figure out what Friedman was trying to convey. I agree with Friedman’s one social responsibility for a business. However, when compared to Freeman’s article, his message was much clearer and defined better than…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What do you think about the social responsibility of businesses? Do you think they have certain social requirements or should the main objective of a business be to make money? This is a very in-depth and valid question in which both Milton Friedman and Robert Almeder have strong opinions. Although their opinions are polar opposite they have valid arguments. The objective is to analyze both opinions from their perspective point of views based on the examples given in the text. A mixture of both positions would provide a common ground for all people involved.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Respond to the position made by Milton Freedman on corporate social responsibility at this site (if this does not connect directly please copy and past on a separate web page on the URL line):…

    • 3212 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Friedman argues that "only people can have responsibilities" but that "businesses as a whole” cannot, as they are not persons. Since the corporate executive is an employee of the shareholders, and therefore only “responsible to his employers.” The corporate executive has primary responsibility to his employers to conduct business as they see fit, and manage the business to create the most profit while following the “basic rules of the society”. It is then seen that the corporate executive is acting as a “public employee,” while serving shareholders and should be directed by those shareholders how to spend their money.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Friedman, a ‘good’ corporation is not one that undertakes activities only because they are ethically sound, but because they are economically viable. Milton Friedman argued against spending shareholder’s money for anything that does not directly contribute to increasing shareholder wealth or profit. His main argument stems from his views on what constitutes ethical spending. In other words, he noted that it is not appropriate for a corporate executive or director to embark on social objectives or programs because there is little incentive for prudent expenditure, particularly when one is spending money owed to the shareholders through dividends. In addition, companies should not engage in any charitable activities or dedicate…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After reading these articles, I conclude that the social responsibility of a business is to make a profit. Both Friedman and Mackey were arguing the same thing, just painting the picture in different ways. Like the Rorschach inkblot test, they were both describing the same subject, with the same interpretations using different delivery methods. Unfortunately capitalism runs the world. Fact is, our society is built off greed and the true Social Responsibility of any and all businesses is to do the bare minimum to lure in enough consumers to be able to make a profit and grow.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays