Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Literary Critical Theories

Good Essays
637 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Literary Critical Theories
Marxist Literary Criticism:
What do Marxist literary critics do with texts?
They explore ways in which the text reveals ideological oppression of a dominant economic class over subordinate classes. In order to do this a Marxist might ask the following questions:
Does the text reflect or resist a dominant ideology? Does it do both?
Does the main character in a narrative affirm or resist bourgeosie values?
Whose story gets told in the text? Are lower economic groups ignored or devalued?
Are values that support the dominant economic group given privilege? This can happen tacitly, in the way in which values are taken to be self-evident.
Who was the audience? What does the text suggest about the values of this audience?
What other approaches resemble Marxist literary criticism?
Marxist literary criticism often shares with feminist criticism a desire to challenge the power structures in contemporary society. For feminist, the issue is a marginalized gender; for Marxists, the issue is not gender but economic power, leading to political power.
Marxist literary criticism can also be viewed as a type of cultural criticism, in that it seeks to analyze a discourse (of power) that makes up one of the discourses that determine a text's historical meaning.
Example:
“Harrison Bergeron” helped me understand Marx’s theory of communism by applying “equality” in the most extreme sense of the word. . . . Though it [the story] contained much opinion, it offered a tangible example to work through Marx’s ideas. The most helpful aspect of this story was the characters’ loss of individuality and ability to think for themselves. The stomping out of social differences is shown to be difficult and extreme.
This process of doing theory by conducting an analysis of “Harrison Bergeron” provides an object of study that has real-world implications to understanding the impact of capitalism and communism. At the same time, it generates a dialogue beyond Marx by initiating questions about social difference and social inequality . . . . Vonnegut (1998) compelling, because they have such a difficult time imagining a world without capitalism, economic classes, and social inequality.
Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” put a human face, applicable to any one of us, on Marxist theory. Marx’s theory came to life—could see it as reality—even if it was over-exaggerated, it brought the message home. It also generated a lot of personal thought: how far do we have to go to achieve equality?
The above excerpts were taken from Christina D. Weber’s peer-reviewed journal article titled “Literary Fiction as a Tool for Teaching Social Theory and Critical Consciousness”

Feminist Literary Criticism:
Feminist criticism is concerned with "...the ways in which literature (and other cultural productions) reinforce or undermine the economic, political, social, and psychological oppression of women" (Tyson). This school of theory looks at how aspects of our culture are inherently patriarchal (male dominated)
Typical questions:
How is the relationship between men and women portrayed?
What are the power relationships between men and women (or characters assuming male/female roles)?
How are male and female roles defined?
What constitutes masculinity and femininity?
How do characters embody these traits?
Do characters take on traits from opposite genders? How so? How does this change others’ reactions to them?
What does the work reveal about the operations (economically, politically, socially, or psychologically) of patriarchy?
What does the work imply about the possibilities of sisterhood as a mode of resisting patriarchy?
What does the work say about women's creativity?
What does the history of the work's reception by the public and by the critics tell us about the operation of patriarchy?
What role the work play in terms of women's literary history and literary tradition?
The above excerpts regarding Feminist Theory are taken directly from the Purdue Online Writing Lab, which has also quoted directly from Louis Tyson’s Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What do the tone, diction, and evidence of the text tell us about its presumed audience?…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., the reader is called into question whether equality or individuality is best while controlled by an authoritarian communist government. Both authors test their audience with creative devices to question if everyone has to be equal. After reading Fahrenheit 451 and “Harrison Bergeron” the reader can draw parallels between both texts of the topic of individuality as being a positive or negative thing. As it turns out, individuality is most equal of all.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The short story “Harrison Bergeron,” by Kurt Vonnegut, is a story about a dystopian, futuristic society in which every citizen is made “equal” to everyone else. In the story, the author seems to be telling a tale of the horrors of socialism and putting everyone on the same level, but the author is giving a humorous portrayal of socialist society to show that fears of socialism are ridiculous. In order to examine the themes in “Harrison Bergeron”, and to discern what the work reveals about the author's feelings or opinions on the subject understanding two parts of the short story is necessary: examples of ridiculous ideas in the story, and jokes in the…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Curley's Power

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The economy in this text does not allow for the working class to rise above there economic standing. The economic super powers of that time constantly lead everyone for there money. It also required that people would have to work very hard to earn a basic wage. For example George and Lennie have aspired to one day own a farm. There dreams are put on hold due to the comic condition of there country. With this economic power of the white man the novel also portrays the power white man had over the coloured men of that time. Although many white men where not wealthy they still where a step above being a coloured person. For many white men they felt because of this they had power over the lives of coloured people. Aside from the racial power evident in the novel Steinbeck also shows the negative associated with power over another. This can be seen in the relationship between Lennie and Crooks. While also we see that George has quite an amount of power over Lennie and this ultimately leads to Lennie’s demise.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When reading a book, or any piece of literature of that matter, the readers background is important. It is apart of how the reader perceives the piece. Two different readers with different viewpoints and backgrounds are naturally going to have different opinions and will analyze the same piece of writing very differently. For example, a feminist lens and a marxist lens. A feminist lens would notice all cases where a man and a women are not being compared as equal or a woman is being more dependent . A marxist lens would analyze everything as a higher power and a lower power, everything from their viewpoint would involve rank of importance and power. In Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston, there were many ways a person with a feminist lens and a person with a marxist lens would analyze the same situation completely different.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    That Nancy Hartstock should follow Karl Marx’s lead in developing her “Feminist Standpoint” - the perspective of the oppressed in a ‘phallocratic’ regime in order to describe the oppressive dynamics of the ruling gender – did not surprise me. After all, as she explains, it is only through his use of a proletariat perspective that enabled Marx to accurately view and describe the exchange of values that ultimately benefits the bourgeoisie with surplus value, much to the detriment of their workers, subsequently left to survive on subsistence-wages. Given its historic standing, political credentials and academic regard, Marxist understanding of capital and capitalism would be the logical blueprint upon which to build a more modern analysis…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice and Men

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Because the writing is a reflection of the reality of the time in which it was written, Marxist critics examine the literary work to see if it either…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rowbotham, Hartmann*, and Ehrenreich each draw on Marx to construct a new socialist-feminist approach to social analysis and political change. What aspect or aspects of Marx’s thought does each find to be most useful? Show how their choices about what to take from Marx shape the political implications of their theories. Whose use of Marx makes the most sense for contemporary feminism(or, if you wish, another contemporary social movement)?…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I’m going to write about two different social groups, Gender and Social Class because Feminism fits in to gender and Marxism fits into Social Class.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The audience has been abused for years, have likely lived under the weight of poverty for generations. Marx reminds them of all that they have went through, bringing forward any strong emotions they might have, and directs them into a force for change. He pokes holes in the most common arguments against Communism, and promises that by following this new regime, eventually everyone will be equals. He promises “free education,” “equal obligation to work,” and the removal of “class antagonisms” (Marx). Most of Marx’s readers would enjoy the idea of revolting against their malignant class system. These promises, which are more than most of these people have ever hoped for, likely outweigh any doubts they have about…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hunger games notes

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is A Marxist Critique? A Marxist critique follows how the philosophy of Marxism coincides with the plot of a novel. Marxism focuses on the struggle between the rich (owning class) and middle classes (the bourgeoisie), and the working class (the proletariat). It states that the only way real equality can be achieved is through violent revolution and the sharing of all goods. Marxism focuses on the industrial worker's struggle. What Do I Look For? Look for any struggles between the rich and the poor, any kind of inequality, the use of religion controlling a population, and the idea that people need to help one another to survive. Rich Versus Poor. The Rich: Both the "Owning Class" and the "Bourgeoisie" in the book are represented by the Capitol. The Capitol has an overabundance of food and technology, with a small population and size when compared to the districts. This shows an inequality between the two societies. The Poor In the book, the proletariat is represented by the various Districts surrounding the Capitol. The districts are starved, oppressed, must give all goods to the Capitol, and are treated as if they were serfs. The societies also are closer to nature, and have less of an access to technology than the Capitol. The Continuous Revolution: The two opposing forces, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, both go against one another, and over time, Katniss realizes that for there to be a better life for those around her, she must work towards a revolution to overthrow the Capitol, which coincides with Marxist thinking. Pre-Maoist Society in the Book Maoism is a type of Marxist thought that focuses on making a farming community, and not a factory community, equal.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literaryanalysis

    • 680 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Quite instantly after I read the inaugural address and the poem I was able to find key differences which led me to believe that they should be classified in separate literary categories. This essay will summarize what differences I detected and why I feel they were important in contrasting the two literacy pieces.…

    • 680 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, Karl Marxl reasoned that workers would be broken by any capitalist, or factory owners, because he believed that a capitalist system provides an advantage for the rich and a disadvantage for the poor. The rich would get richer and the poor would get poorer. Furthermore, the “capitalist” is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers, he argued. One of his notable and more arguable theories claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Interestingly, Karl Marx also had his own drastic, political ideas that were far away from those of Adam Smith’s.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the main ideas in the Communist Manifesto is that one, class alienation is a constant struggle within a society, and two that capitalism causes individuals to suffer both financially and socially. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ Communist Manifesto provides examples and explanation of these issues in order to convince the world of the benefits of communism, assuming communism is the solution for these dilemmas. According to the Manifesto the two varying classes have their own problems, whether caused by the system or their own mind sets. The problems of each class is what had led to the course of history, the financial suffering of society, and the negative results of capitalism at work, as well as the need for communism according to the authors of the Manifesto.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Part A: Learning the different literary lenses will help further my ability to thoroughly analyze the literature I read. As seen with the examples used throughout the seminar presentations sometimes a certain critical theory can be used more successful for certain pieces of text. Having the knowledge of the many different ways there is to analyze a text I can choose one that will be more accurate. Also, in many cases you can use a bunch of different lenses to analyze one text, but being able to see the different views can help build a more detailed understanding. Although I was somewhat aware of certain lenses such as marxist or feminist theory a lot of the theories were completely new to me and something I hadn’t even considered. Now knowing how much the biography of the author or even the way the way the environment…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics