Preview

LIM GUAN ENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2000 2

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11897 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
LIM GUAN ENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2000 2
Malayan Law Journal Reports/2000/Volume 2/LIM GUAN ENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR - [2000] 2 MLJ 577 - 18 June 1999

22 pages

[2000] 2 MLJ 577

LIM GUAN ENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

FEDERAL COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
EUSOFF CHIN CHIEF JUSTICE, WAN ADNAN CJ (MALAYA) AND ZAKARIA YATIM FCJ
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS M05-3 OF 1998, M-05-4 OF 1998 AND M-05-5 OF 1998
18 June 1999

Criminal Law -- Malicious publication of false news -- Detention of under-aged girl published as 'imprisonment' -- Presumption of malicious publication, rebuttal of -- Test applicable -- Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 s 8A(1)

Criminal Law -- Sedition -- Publication of false news -- Conviction on uncorroborated evidence of one witness -- Whether witness was corroborated by own former statement -- Seditious Act 1948 s 6(1) -- Evidence Act 1950 ss 73A & 157

The appellant was charged with two offences. The first charge was under s 8A(1) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 for maliciously publishing false news in the form of a pamphlet entitled 'Mangsa Dipenjarakan'. The second charge was under s 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948 for making a speech which contained seditious words. Both charges were with regard to the non-prosecution of an alleged rape case involving Tan Sri Rahim Thamby Chik with an under-aged girl. The High Court found the appellant guilty of both charges, convicted and fined him (see [1998] 3 MLJ 14). The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal against his convictions and sentences while the Public Prosecutor appealed against the sentences. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeals against convictions and sentences but allowed the Public Prosecutor's cross-appeals and sentenced the appellant to imprisonment (see [1998] 3 MLJ 14). The appellant appealed. Counsel submitted, inter alia, that s 6(1) of the Seditious Act 1948 does not permit conviction of an offence under s 4 on the uncorroborated testimony of one witness. Therefore, according to him,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There are four conditions which can judge whether a case can be thought as a libel case or not. The case should meet the basic conditions such as defamation, publication, identification, and fault (Tedford & Herbeck, 2009). In the Clark Jones’, there is insulting and harmful information in the article which can be called defamation. The article was published on the Internet which was viewed by many people.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is the appellant’s skeleton argument for the case of his appeal. The arguments to quash the conviction under s. 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA) are based on the misdirection’s…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Negligence – a newspaper that ignores a judge’s instructions & publishes the name of a police officer who had been sexually assaulted during an undercover investigation.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 16 ]. Ankita Rustogi, ‘The Right to Bail under Indian Criminal Procedure Law’ (2009) Social Science Research Network 9. .…

    • 5042 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Evidence Rule

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Administrative Law, Trimester 2, 2012 Assignment Question „[The] statutory “no evidence” ground of judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222, at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam, which do you prefer, and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question, you should read the following three prescribed cases. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002) 210 CLR 222 Television Capricornia Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 13 FCR 511 SGFB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) FCAFC 422 You may, however, also choose to read the following supplementary reading. The supplementary reading consists of the following three cases. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Sunchen Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) FCA 21 The supplementary reading also consists of the following article. Andrew Pinchin, ‘No Evidence’ and ‘Mistake of Fact’: A Reconsideration (2007) 55 AIAL Forum 59-85 This supplementary reading might assist your understanding, but students will not be penalised for not referring to it, nor rewarded for referring to it. The focus should be on the prescribed reading for the assignment. As this is a reflective and not a research essay, you should not refer to material outside the prescribed and supplementary reading. You should follow the advice below, but also the advice given in the Study Guide on the assignment. Note especially the reference to penalties if the 1500 word limit is exceeded. You should also follow any further advice on the question provided in lecture notes. Some advice on the assignment The question requires students to reflect on primary material, rather than merely…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Child Care Act Essay

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages

    PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006…

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2.Lee, Mei Pheng 2005, General Principles of Malaysian Law 5th Ed., Oxford Fajar, Selangor, Malaysia.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study: Bachan Singh

    • 3781 Words
    • 16 Pages

    (C.K. Thakker and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ.) Bachan Singh ------------------ Appellant v. Union of India & Ors. -------------- Respondent(s) Civil Appeal No. 3110 of 2004, decided on July 10, 2008 The judgment of the Court was delivered by Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Bachan Singh - appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated February 5, 2002 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu allowing the LPA (SW) No. 284/97 filed by the respondents herein against the judgment dated November 20, 1996 of the learned Single Judge of the High Court whereby the learned Single Judge allowed SWP No. 14-A/1984 filed by the appellant and quashed the General Court-Martial held against him including confirmation of sentence passed upon him by the General Court-Martial and the appellant is relegated back to the position he had on the date of passing of the order with all the benefits under the Rules. A General Court-Martial (GCM) under the Army Act, 1950 (for short `the Act') was convened by the competent authority on January 4, 1982 under Section 109 of the Act to try the appellant holding the rank of Sepoy in Second Batallion, the Dogra Regiment in the Army. The allegations against the appellant for which he was suspected to be tried by GCM were:"No.3973649A Sep Bachan Singh of 2DOGRA is resident of village Paragwal, Tehsil Akhnoor, District Jammu (J&K) S/o Shri Dharam Singh and step son of Smt. Gyano Devi, second wife of Shri Dharam Singh. Sep. Bachan Singh studied in Govt. Lower High School, Paragwal upto the 9th. He was enrolled in the Army on 11 Oct. 75 to Meerut in the Dogra Regt. He is married to Smt. Veena Kumari D/o Shri Durga Singh resident of Village Chargarwar, Tehsil Jammu, District Jammu (J&K). Sep Bachan Singh proceeded on annual leave w.e.f. 16 Jan 80 to 15 Mar 80 to his home station village Paragwal, Tehsil Akhnoor. Shri Bachan Singh S/o Shri Waryam Singh resident of…

    • 3781 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second defendant was adjudged a bankrupt in 1998. After becoming a bankrupt, he continued to represent himself in the company correspondence as chairman or director and took part in the management of the company and was even appointed general manager.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brij Mohan Lal Vs. Union of India and Other s With T.C. (C) No. 23 / 2001. SLP (C) No. 7870.10645 of 2001 and T.P. (C) No. 407 - 410 of 2001…

    • 4656 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The given case Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India[1] is essentially a consequence of the first case Salem Advocates Bar Association, Tamil Nadu. v. Union of India[2]. The honourable Judges managing the case were Y.K. Sabharwal, D.M. Dharmadhikari and Tarun Chatterjee. The subject is fundamentally identified with Constitution and is an instance of common nature. In the previous case, there were some alterations made to Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the Amendment Acts of 1999 and 2002.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Small ClaimProcedures

    • 2886 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Jumin, R. B. (2011, MAY 12). LATAR BELAKANG. Retrieved JULY 16, 2013, from Laman Web Rasmi Mahakamah Negeri Sembilan: http://nsembilan.kehakiman.gov.my/?q=node/350…

    • 2886 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malaysian Court System

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    THE SUPERIOR COURTS This consists of the High Court of Malaya, the High Court of Sabah & Sarawak, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. The Federal Court is the highest court of the land. High CourtsThe High Courts have general supervisory and revisionary jurisdiction over all the Subordinate Courts and hear appeals from the Subordinate Courts in civil and criminal matters. They hear matters relating to the validity or dissolution of marriage (divorce) and matrimonial causes, bankruptcy and companies winding up matters, guardianship or custody of children, grants probates of wills and letters of administration of deceased persons, injunctions, specific performance or rescissions of contracts, legitimacy of any persons and generally actions of which the claim exceeds RM250,000-00 (except motor vehicle accidents, landlord and tenant and distress). The High Courts have powers to hear all criminal matters. Court of AppealGenerally, the Court of Appeal hears all civil appeals against decisions of the High Courts except where against judgment or orders made by consent. In cases where the claim is less than RM250,000-00 or the judgment or order relates to costs only or against decisions of a judge in chambers on an interpleader summons on undisputed facts, leave of the Court of Appeal must first be obtained. The Court of Appeal also hears criminal appeals against decisions of the High Courts. Federal CourtAll civil appeals from the Court of Appeal are heard by the Federal Court only after leave is granted by the Federal Court. The Federal Court also hears criminal appeals from the Court of Appeal only in respect of matters heard by the High Court in its original jurisdiction. THE SUBORDINATE COURTS This consists of the Sessions Courts, the Magistrates' Courts and in West Malaysia the Penghulu's Courts. Penghulu's CourtsGenerally, the Penghulu's Courts hear civil matters of…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Blue Dart Courier Ppt

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages

    S.No. B 1 2 3 Section Offences under IPC 193 204, 477 463,465,466,468,469, 471,474,476,477A 405, 406, 408, 409 False electronic evidence Destruction of electronic evidence Forgery 0 0 217 0 0 264 Crime Head Cases registered Persons Arrested…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5.---(1)'' As ftom the lst dayofJanuary, 1958, native customary rights may be createdin accordance with the native customarylaw of the cornmurity or conmunities concemedby any of the methods specilied subsection ifa permitis obtained in (2), urde! section10, upon Intgrio! Ar€a Land. Saveas aforesaid, without Fejudice to but the provisions hereinaftercontainedirt respectof Native Communal Reserves rights ofway, no recognitionshall be givento anymtive and customary rightsoverany landin Sarawak created afterthe lst dayof January, 1958,and if the land is Statelandany person occupation in thereofshall deemed be in unlawfuloccupation State be to of landand section shallapplythereto. 209 The methods by which native customaryrights may be At acquiredare(a) the felling of virgin jungle and the occupation the of land ahereby cleared; (b) the plantingof land with fruit trees; (c) the occupation cultivation or ofland; (d) (, the useof landfor a burial groundor shrine; any other la\{ul method: (i) until a docunentof title has beenissuedin respectthereof, such land shall coriti[ue to be Stateland and any native lawfully in occupation thereof shall be deemed hoid by liceoce to from the Government shall and not b€ .equired to pay any rent in respcctthereof unless anduntil a document ofiitle is issued him; aid to (ii) the questionwhethq any such dght has beed acquired hasbeenlost or extidguished or shall,sd[e''inso far as this Code makescontraryprovision, be determiried by the law in force immediately prior to the lst day of January, 1958. (e) the useofland ofany class foirights ofway; or Provided that-…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays