Preview

On Liberty - John Stuart Mill

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1119 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On Liberty - John Stuart Mill
John Stuart Mill was a great philosopher of the nineteenth century and the author of 'On Liberty.' In this writing (written in 1850), Mills voiced his ideas on individual freedom, both social and political. His intended audience is educated, healthy and 'civilized' adults. He equates our personal freedoms with the pursuit of happiness, in particular, freedom of speech and expression. Mill defines the meaning of liberty as the relationship between the State and an individual, in regards to the power the government has over an individual. He says that power needs to be guarded against if man is to develop and succeed. He argues that the government should not interfere with an individual's civil liberties as long as a person's action does not harm another. He feels that the basis of a healthy democracy is our personal right to freedom and expression without censorship. He also raises the question surrounding the limits of power that can be legally exercised by the state over an individual. In other words, where do we draw the line between individual liberty and authority? What role should government play in our lives? These questions have influenced the practices of societies throughout history and are relevant to the political climate of today and also the future.

He builds his argument by tracing the struggle between liberty and authority throughout history, using Greece, Rome, and England as examples of Classical and Post Classical models. Power was either passed down by inheritance or was won through conquests (with the exception of Greece for a short period of time). There were two types of power, 1) power of the state through its laws and 2) power from popular opinion (hoi polloi). Through the evolution of civilization, the role of the state became procedural. The state became rule makers and could only punish if the rules were broken.

Mill feels that the state should interfere, by imposing consequences through the law, when a person's behavior impacts others.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrick Henry's "Give Me Liberty" speech was propaganda used to persuade the American colonies to band together and fight for a nation independent from Great Britain. He starts the speech off by saying that the colonies efforts of trying to maintain the peace with Britain were not working. The colonists were angry with Parliament for passing Acts of taxation without representatives from the colonies being present to dispute them and wanted Parliament to repeal those Acts. Patrick says that their pleas were being disregarded and belittled by King George and Parliament. He then begins to say that the hope of regaining peace with Britain is no longer existent. The war had already started and the colonies must fight to keep their freedom and privileges…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Stuart Mills believed very strongly in individual liberty and freedom. However I think that it is first important to state that Mills did not believe in unlimited liberty. He thought that this would lead to conflict, and therefore he believed that government was essential. He believed that the role of the government should be to protect citizens from such conflict, yet still allow for individual liberty and progress.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Choose one of the philosophers he discusses in Book II and discuss how and/or why Powers chooses this particular thinker. Use specific examples of Powers’s and the thinker’s words/ideas to demonstrate the kinds of appeals he uses and why he’s using them.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill, author of the chapter “Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion” in the philosophical work On Liberty, outlines four main arguments of why society is impacted by the silencing of others’ opinions. Wayne Fuller, author of the chapter “Diffusion of Knowledge” in the work The American Mail: Englarger of the Common Life,” presents ideas that Mill would be able to apply his ideas to.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Week 1 Quiz

    • 651 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The answer can be found in the section “The Rule of Law Versus the Rule of Man.”…

    • 651 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout this paper I discussed Mills view on Nature verses Nurture which is he is belief that we are who we are because of our education and upbringing rather than our nature. I also explained how Mill became a supporter of women’s rights. Next, I explained Mills view of Representative Democracy and how to minimize corruption. After that, I discussed how enlightenment plays a role in Mills views on the tyranny of the majority. The fifth topic that was discussed was about the voucher system and how Mill believes it will lead to higher quality education; followed by Mill’s belief that the middle class should be the backbone of politics. Lastly, I have discussed Mill’s views on inheritance. In conclusion, the views of Mill that have been discussed thus far in class include Mills views on nature verses nurture, women in the Victorian Era, representative democracy, tyranny of the majority, voucher system, middle class and inheritance as well as my opinions on some of these…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of government, in the eyes of Mill, should be to allow citizens to freely pursue happiness and freedom without restriction. Mill believed that the roll of government should be to protect the happiness of the citizens and ensure that their personal happiness is not jeopardized in any way. Personal…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill once said, “The amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time.” John Stuart Mill is one of the most prominent English-speaking philosophers during the 19th century. His works incorporated a huge range of topics in his articles and papers he has written, in which a few of them include A System of Logic, On Liberty, and Utilitarianism. Mill’s main goal when composing On Liberty was best seen by taking a gander at how he talked about his work in his Autobiography. Mill composed that he accepted On Liberty to show the significance to man and to the society, of an extensive variety on sorts of character, and the opportunity given to human instinct to extend itself in…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Public Education was an important fundamental to Thomas Jefferson. In the Liberty to Learn, there is an explanation on how public education was one of his main priorities, and even though there were a few obstacles along the way he did not lose interest in his pursuit to establish public education. During this time, Americans were going through something in where they were getting their liberty and property violated by King George III. Thomas Jefferson believed that Americans were being ignorant but due to the lack of education and that was why they did not try to fight for their rights. Thomas Jefferson tried to pass a bill in where it had three different elements and education would be free. It was not passed but he was very proud of it.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Mill “The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of the passage Locke expresses his view on the government. He feels as though civilization has given up their liberty for luxuries. “Individuals…surrendering absolute liberty in exchange for the protection...the human mind begins as a blank slate and acquires knowledge through experience.” He also thought “experience is either sensation or reflection…both begin at birth and together they entirely determine human understanding.” I would say that his ideas would be representative to another person. any people gain information by trying it by themselves. A child won’t know not to touch the oven until they get burned. I think all around people gain knowledge by experience. Even if they do not experience, they may experience…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s “On Liberty” discusses the freedom of and the freedom of expressing all opinions by saying that any of the opinions that are silenced could either be partially or fully true and, that’s why they could silenced. I do not agree with Mill on this aspects because, some opinions in a society should be silenced for many reasons other than the fact they might be true. As Mill states that all opinions should be permitted on the condition that they are temperate and contribute to the “bonds of fair discussion” (Mill, 774)…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty And Equality

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From the beginning of the relationship it is already understood that we have freedom as humans, so long as our actions do not harm the other person involved in the relationship, this is implied in Equality and generally accepted as a concept by parties involved. Nowhere is the concept of equality more radical than in the ideas of Marx and his Communist Manifesto, decrying the bourgeoisie for its unremorseful control and force of their liberty on the ever growing proletariat. The person who stood me up is the “bourgeoisie, [and] therefore, produces, above all…its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable”. Assuming this person continuously repeats this cycle of standing up their dates a group of people will form, decrying the unethical treatment of human beings. Equality eventually demands itself to be heard in these types of situations, whether it be personal relationships or struggles between economic classes. Communism lends the idea that the “liberal society of representative democracy combined with free market capitalism represents oppression rather than freedom for the vast majority of those living under it”. The key component here being the liberty with which the Bourgeoisie set up these systems of unregulated trade using the proletariat as pawns for their liberal ideals, but inequity grows here and is ignored to a point where the date analogy will repeat itself, revolution begins and equality is demanded. A strong central government that people discard complete liberty to in the name of complete equality sounds too idealistic, and downright utopian, but the verisimilitude of that is not what is important. The importance lays in the attempt of equality. Even Hobbes, cynical as he was, believed “from this equality of ability ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of our ends”. Equality promises that…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In playing a constructive role in Australia political discourse, we need to be clear that promotion of terrorism is beyond the scope of free speech protections. Liberty and freedom in a democratic society are not absolute terms. In his famous Essay on Liberty the English philosopher John Stuart Mill recognised that liberty does not mean the licence of individuals to do just as they please, because such liberty would mean the absence of law and of order, and ultimately the destruction of liberty.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays