Libertarianism Vs Egalitarianism

Reading Question 1: Friedman says the central question of political philosophy is "How can we benefit from the promise of government while avoiding the threat to freedom?" What does he mean by this? What is the promise of government? In what ways might government be a threat to our freedom?
The question of how can we benefit the promise of government while avowing the threat to freedom is a mind provoking questions that Freidman asked. He means that the government is there for the people as it is developed by the people. However, the government has the capacity to destroy the freedom that the people want. The government must be limited in uhsing the power, dispersed by going to other states, and decentralizing the poser. With this, the government is responsible for protecting, balancing, providing, and maintain the rights of the people.
It can be described as equality versus liberty. In egalitarianism, the goal is to have the people equal in the living experience. This means that every person is entitled to the same programs based on needs. The central theme is to equalize the income, opportunity, and responsibilities to the society. The thought is that we are all in this process together; therefore, we should all be treated the same. Egalitarianism is based solely on the person rather than family wealth. This has the best outcomes for society. In libertarianism, the goal is based in having the freedom to operate has desired. This means that every person is entitled to act as he sees fit. Each person must act in a way that is beneficial to the society. It is left up to the individual as opposed to a government which can limit opportunities to prosper in society. They do not support the laws, statues, or restrictions that undermine freedom of operations. Essentially, the disagreement is based on individual needs which is egalitarianism or based on individual ability which is