Preview

King Lear

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear
King Lear

In King Lear, William Shakespeare introduces the theme of madness. He illustrates that the act of being mad is what drives people foolish through the use of the motifs madness and foolishness. The play starts off with King Lear dividing his kingdom into his three daughters Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia and by testing their love. When Cordelia doesn’t tell him what he wants to hear, Lear gets mad and everyone and everything goes downhill. In Josephine Waters Bennett’s work, “The Storm Within: the Madness of Lear,” Bennett explains, “An understanding of Lear’s madness is essential to any serious interpretation of the play and to any understanding of its structure” (137). In order to understand the play and the meaning you first have to understand Lear’s madness. The quote is significant because it implies that Lear’s madness is a protagonist of the play because it drives Lear to commit foolish and memorable things like disowning Cordelia or giving up all his authority to Goneril and Regan. In “Enter Lear Mad,” by Sholom J. Kahn, Kahn describes almost the same point of view: “It is obvious that the central acts of King Lear portray the progressive stages of his growing madness, but there has been no close attention paid to the question of the precise moment, if any, at which Lear is truly mad” (311). This quote demonstrates that there is no exact moment to when King Lear has become fully mad; so to understand the interpretation of the play one must follow the structure of the progressive stages as his growing madness occurs. If we follow the progressive stages of his growing madness we get the ability to observe in detail how it affects Lear and the other characters. These so-called “progressive stages,” as Kahn mentions, are described as:
“Lear in Acts II and III is not yet fully mad, but rather on the way to that condition; Act III – Scene VI shows him in a state which alternates between pathetic sanity and growing fits of lunacy; and the full

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    nick summers review

    • 8586 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The Madness of King LearBy Nick Summers - December 08, 2002 It is odd to think that true madness can ever be totally understood. Shakespeare's masterful depiction of the route to insanity, though, is one of the stronger elements of King Lear. The early to middle stages of Lear's deterioration (occurring in Acts I through III) form a highly rational pattern of irrationality: Lear's condition degenerates only when he is injured or when some piece of the bedrock upon which his old, stable world rested is jarred loose. His crazy behavior makes a lot of sense. Despite his age and frailty, Lear is no weak character; it is difficult to imagine how another character could have better resisted such mental and emotional weights as the king suffers under. Lear's worsening madness is understandable only when interpreted with a proper appreciation of the intense forces acting on him and of the gradual disappearance of everything he finds recognizable about his former world.As Lear sets out from his palace toward his daughters' homes, he is still sane, though he begins to regret disowning Cordelia ‹the first sign of mental stress and the first step toward his eventual madness. Lear's Fool needles him about the rash decision, and the king blurts out, "O! let me be not mad, not mad, sweet heaven; / Keep me in temper; I would not be mad!" (I.v.46-47) It is a harbinger of thoughts to come.Lear's impending madness is established in parallel with the growing storm; both threaten to break at any moment. But Lear is strong: he does not give in to insanity all at once; instead he holds on as long as he can, only gradually slipping into lunacy. And Lear is strong‹it is important to note the severity of the stressors acting on him; ignoring them can lead to a misinterpretation of his character as a weak, senile old man instead of a capable leader simply abused by the people he trusted. Perhaps he was foolish to trust them in the first place, but he was not crazy. Above all, Lear's madness…

    • 8586 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, King Lear is an old foolish man who suffers several flaws in the same way, he is blind to the truth, and his inability to see the truth impacts his decisions making and his poor judgment. Throughout act one and two, King Lear decisions lead to several consequences, which alter his life and the lives of those around him. A few of King Lear’s flaws which demonstrates the great deed of one man’s consequences are, his actions due to his blindness, rash decision making and exhibits a great deed of pride and arrogance.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both characters suffered from a psychological blindness. Lear were unable to see his two daughters deceiving him, along with being unable to see Cordelia’s true love. He also portrayed this inability to see when he banished his loyal follower, Kent. When he was unable to realize that it was Kent in disguise as his servant, it only reinforces the theme. The consequences of his condition were that “tragedy id inevitable”, his blindness did not allow for him “to recognize the errors of his decisions” this is the direct cause for the kingdom being “torn apart” (Pappril 3). Gloucester also was seriously affected by this blindness. This caused him to not be able to see the true and honorable man that Edgar was, and not see the truly evil person that Edmund was. A part of these two heroes’ journeys was Lear and Gloucester’s ability to overcome this blindness, and regain a true sense for the moral flaws of themselves. Luckily, they began to see the true qualities of the people that they once trusted, or the people that they once rejected. Lear’s “eyesight” began to recover as the play progressed. He began to see the true colors of Goneril and Regan after they refused to let him live with them and locked them out of his castle during the perilous storm. He was faced with the fact that their eulogies that were given at the beginning of the play were nothing but lies to benefit their own selfish causes. Most importantly, Lear was gaining the aptitude to get passed Cordelia’s inability to adulate her father and see that her love truly was so vast that it was indefinable. Lear is able to overcome his haughtiness and results in him begging for forgiveness from Cordelia. Gloucester’s sight begins to make a reappearance in Act IV when he realizes that Edgar was Poor Tom and it was his son who saved his life. He then comprehends that Edmund was completely dishonest and that it…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Living

    • 1017 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Lear’s first speech in this scene, how does Shakespeare portray the great emotional upheaval going on within Lear’s mind?…

    • 1017 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ageism in king Lear

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gloucester observes disastrous events occurring in the play, most notably the ones occurring in the kingdom. He notes that love can never last, friendships eventually break up, and brothers become enemies which eventually leads to chaotic behavior. Ultimately, these malicious acts break out into devastating events such as civil wars, the bond breaking between father and son, and lastly the betrayal of King Lear and his noble power. In addition to all of these spiteful acts, it is evident that ageism is also portrayed in the play about the King himself, especially at the end of scene one. The first sign of how ageism begins in the first act is King Lear’s debatable decision to divide up the kingdom between his three daughters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. Eventually, Lear’s unwise decision causes chaos and havoc throughout the family, leading to multiple conflicts such as the banishment of Cordelia and the insulting comments about Lear’s old age and judgement.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    stages of the play refers to Lear abdicating his throne and splitting his kingdom into three for his…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deception In King Lear

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lear begins to realize the hard truth mid-way through the play. Act II scene four is where Lear begins to add things up and realize His daughters are not honoring him.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s tragic works are notably characterized by the hamartia of their protagonists. This tragic flaw is a defect in character that brings about an error in action, eventually leading to the characters imminent downfall. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, written in 1606, the King’s hamartia proves to be his extreme rashness, which results in the loss of most everything that he holds dear, including his authority, his affluence and his family. The reasons for his downfall lie within the flaws of his own character, made evident by his insatiable need for flattery and his egotistical fixations.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although King Lear by Shakespeare and Candide by Voltaire are very different on the outside they share internal values. King Lear is a play written by William Shakespeare, who was an English poet and playwright who was widely regards as the greatest writer in the English language and the world pre-eminent dramatist (Shakespear, 1998). Candide by Voltaire is a satire, Voltaire was born Francois-Marie Arouet, he use his satirizing style of writing to make fun of the Powerful Frenchmen of his time (voltaire, 1991). The internal values of both books connect them with the Human Condition of man, His love of family in King Lear, with his daughter Cordelia un-condition love for him and Candide love for Lady Cunegonde. The hardship that both characters endured throughout these writing, King Lear by Shakespeare and Candide by Voltaire.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sanity of Hamlet

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In both Hamlet and King Lear, Shakespeare incorporates a theme of madness with two characters: one truly mad, and one only acting mad to serve a motive. The madness of Hamlet is frequently disputed. This paper argues that the contrapuntal character in each play, namely Ophelia in Hamlet and Edgar in King Lear, acts as a balancing argument to the other character's madness or sanity. King Lear's more decisive distinction between Lear's frailty of mind and Edgar's contrived madness works to better define the relationship between Ophelia's breakdown and Hamlet's "north-north-west" brand of insanity. Both plays offer a character on each side of sanity, but in Hamlet the distinction is not as clear as it is in King Lear. Using the more explicit relationship in King Lear, one finds a better understanding of the relationship in Hamlet.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William. "King Lear." The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 8th ed. Vol. 1.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Madness Essay

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In both Hamlet and King Lear, Shakespeare incorporates a theme ofmadness with two characters: one truly mad, and one only actingmad to serve a motive. The madness of Hamlet is frequentlydisputed. This paper argues that the contrapuntal character ineach play, namely Ophelia in Hamlet and Edgar in King Lear, actsas a balancing argument to the other character’s madness orsanity. King Lear’s more decisive distinction between Lear’sfrailty of mind and Edgar’s contrived madness works to betterdefine the relationship between Ophelia’s breakdown and Hamlet’s “north-north-west”…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Madness in Hamlet

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is interesting to note other characters in the play acting mad. One is Leartes. Unlike…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    change from the angry evil madman to a broken man dying on a wish. Overall, through solid example’s from Lear and contrast to Shakespeare’s other works, Bamber is able to make a solid case for her theory. Certainly it is obvious that the female aspect of the play (even that of a ‘female’ nature) are some to blame in the madness of Lear, but one might also argue that the King’s own poor choices caused his loss of power and eventual madness.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Madness

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The irony Shakespeare exploits in both Hamlet and Lear is that, while characters dissembling madness feature in both, so does the idea that madmen lack hypocrisy and speak the truth. Hamlet’s apparent madness allows him to blurt out truths and shrewd aphorisms along with nonsense, causing Polonius to say, ‘Though this be madness yet there is method in’t’, and ‘How pregnant sometimes his replies are – a happiness that often madness hits on, which reason and sanity could not so prosperously be delivered of’.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays