Preview

John Marshall Federalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Marshall Federalism
Throughout U.S. History many different types of government were created in an attempt to govern and unify the people. One such government, federalism, divided the balance of power between the states and the national government. Federalism caused a lot of controversy throughout the history of the United States. One time period in which there were significant debates about federalism was the Supreme Court under John Marshall (1801-1835) due to his rulings based on his federalist views. The other time period was the Extension of Slavery (1820-1860) which also caused much debates between federalism and state rights. Landmark Supreme Court decisions involving federalism were decided in both of these time periods. John Marshall served in …show more content…
John Marshall was once the leader of the Virginia Federalist Party. Between 1799 and 1800, he also served in the U.S. House of Representatives and was the Secretary of State under President Adams from 1800 to 1801. One of President Adams final judicial appointments was appointing John Marshall as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1801. Many landmark cases involving federalism were decided during his term as Chief Justice. Under Justice Marshall’s rule, the Supreme Court made several key decisions that balanced the powers between the Federal and State governments. One landmark Supreme Court case was Fletcher v. Peck (1810). The court, under Justice Marshall, ruled that a state law was unconstitutional. This case was about a land grant that was approved by the Georgia State legislature, named the Yazoo Land Act of 1795. The land was taken away from the Native Americans. It was discovered that the grant was approved through bribery …show more content…
Justice Marshall’s decision, in accordance with Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, of the Constitution, was that a sale was a binding contract and wasn’t invalid even if the contract was secured illegally. This case resulted in the Supreme Court stating that they have the right to invalidate a state law that didn’t abide by the Constitution. Fletcher’s argument was that the State of Georgia had the sovereign power to repeal the grant of the land didn’t work. Justice Marshall’s decision was the first time the Supreme Court struck down a state law because it was unconstitutional. Another of Justice Marshall’s landmark Supreme Court cases was McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). The case resulted from an event in 1818 where the State of Maryland tried to place a tax on all bank notes not chartered in the State, specifically at the Second Bank of the U.S., which was the only out-of-state bank in Maryland. James William McCullough, head of the bank, refused to pay the tax. This case involved the power of Congress to charter a bank which caused a lot of controversy between the Federal and State Government since the Constitution didn’t mention who can charter a bank. Two important principles were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The President ignored a court order. “By ignoring the Supreme Court, President Jackson brought to the forefront one of the main problems in the Supreme Court’s power structure, the fact that they did not have the military power to enforce their decisions.”(,http://scottsconstitutionalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/was-andrew-jackson-right-to-ignore.html) “The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter.”(Chief Justice John Marshall) This evidence show’s Chief Justice John Marshall’s decision on Worcester v Georgia, and why President Jackson’s…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The above statement by President Andrew Jackson was made in reference to Chief Justice Marshall’s ruling concerning…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. John Marshall means in his statement that the constitution does not allow the judiciary branch to rule in such a way that Marbury would like. Although Marbury did lose his job, the context in which he earned his job was unconstitutional. Marshall's statement is referring to the inability of the judiciary branch to compensate Marbury for a job which was given in an unconstitutional way.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury vs. Madison- James Madison, the new secretary of state, had cut judge Marbury's salary; Marbury sued James Madison for his pay. The court ruled that Marbury had the right to his pay but, the court did not have the authority to force Madison to give Marbury his pay. Most importantly, this decision showed that the Supreme Court had the final authority in determining the meaning of the Constitution.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Marbury vs Madison case would have to be one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The Marbury vs Madison cases was one of the first cases in U.S. history to ever to apply the principle of Judicial review the Judicial review had the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution , which was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. How it had all started was in 1803 in John Adams last few hours of office John Adams had appointed Marbury and many other judges in his last few hours of office. Republicans argued that these appointments were aimed at maintaining Federalist power. When Thomas Jefferson finally took office he ordered his secretary of states James Maddison to cease the work of…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall was born on September 24, 1755. He was an American jurist and statesman who shaped American constitutional law and made the Supreme Court a center of power. John Marshall was born in a log cabin near Germantown, a rural community on the Virginia frontier, in what is now Fauquier County near Midland, Virginia to Thomas Marshall and Mary Randolph Keith. The oldest of fifteen, John had eight sisters and six brothers. Also, several cousins were raised with the family. From a young age, he was noted for his good humor and black eyes, which were "strong and penetrating, beaming with intelligence and good nature. Thomas Marshall was employed by Lord Fairfax. Known as "the Proprietor", Fairfax provided…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The night before John Adams left the presidential office he appointed various men to be Justices of the Piece. All of these men were Federalist like himself. One of which was William Marbury. However, when Thomas Jefferson came into office he refused to give the men that had been appointed last minute by Adams their federal commission. Jefferson used his secretary of state, James Madison, to be his voice about the situation. Enraged William Marbury and others sued the government and the case went to the Supreme Court. One of the members of the Supreme Court was the recently appointed Chief Justice John Marshall.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the United States Chief Justice, John Marshall changed several governmental standards. These standards include the change in the judicial system and strengthening the central government. “As man whose political doctrines led always…to strengthen government at the expense of the people,” this quote states that Marshall’s goal was only to improve the federal government at the expense of the states. Marshall had served at Valley Forge and had been impressed with the drawbacks of no central authority, thus he became a lifelong Federalist, committed to strengthening the power of the federal government. His theory of putting the central government over the states is a corrupt and damaging idea that will lead to future events, such as Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohens v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden. The power of the federal government should be left in the hands of the states.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall Essay

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Marshall evolved as one of the most influential people in the history of the Judiciary. Marshall was the Federalist holdout who stayed true to the Hamiltonian principals. His establishment of new Supreme Court principals which were all in favor of the Federalist unique beliefs set a precedent of the functionality of the court. Marshall’s theory of Judicial Review was established so the Supreme Court can rule based on the constitutionality of act of congress. Marshall evolved as the pioneer that changed the Supreme Court. The Supremacy of Federalists was adopted to keep state rules in check while all under Constitutional rule. Marshall’s last successful attempt to keep Federalist ideas in the court was his development that there needs to be legitimacy of broad interpretation of the Constitution. In Marbury vs. Madison, Gibbon vs. Ogden, and Mccullah vs. Maryland respectively, Marshall’s Federalist beliefs were shown to be a successful way to give the Judicial Branch more authority then ever before.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marshall Trilogy

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Marshall was fourth Chief Justice in Supreme Court and accredited as being the most influential man in the development of the United States legal system and federal Indian law. The Marshall Court made three significant decisions that directly balanced the power of the Federal Laws and Indian Federal Law. Amongst these resolutions are the three cases that form the simple outline of federal Indian law in the United States, this has been referred to as the ‘Marshall Trilogy.’…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this case, the spheres of responsibility were clearly defined. A layer cake can best describe the division of power between the two levels of governance. At the time, different courts had different interpretations of federalism. The Marshall court supported expansive federal powers. This court had a major influence on how power was shared between the national and state governments. Two cases that were key in defining dual federalism are McCulloh v. Maryland of 1819 and Gibbons v. Ogden of 1824. The Taney Court on the other hand had a different view of federalism. The court supported two equally powerful levels of government (Lee, 2010). The court was of the view that the national government should not exceed its powers beyond the constitutionally accepted levels. The court was influential in limiting the control that the national government had on the issue of slavery and civil rights. One key case at the time was Dred Scott v. Sandford of…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Models

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most popular court cases is McCulloch v. Maryland. In 1819 there wasn’t much judicial power because the Supreme Courts were still getting settled in, and the public was still skeptical in weather they could trust them or not. The McCulloch v. Maryland court case was in the Marshall Court. John Marshall was the chief justice at this time and he is the one who made the Supreme Court a serious player in government. Marshall Court had a pattern of expanding national power. “The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland expanded national power in two ways…” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, allowed the national government to the right to create a bank. This decision limited state power by, “denying the states the authority to tax activities of the national government.” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision of the court was justified by their interpretation of the Constitution. “In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Court ruled that the Bank of the United States was constitutional and that the Maryland tax was unconstitutional. Concerning the power of Congress to charter a bank, the Court turned to the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, which expressly grants Congress the power to pass laws "necessary and proper" for the execution of its "enumerated powers."” (McBride 2006) This court case is one of the most important because it established the ways the Supreme Court…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The State of New York refused to give Gibbson the right away to the Hudson Bay, so in retaliation he sued Ogden. The case ended up going before the Supreme Court, and Chief Justice John Marshall made it known in this case that the intent of the Constitution was to have congress, not the states, regulate interstate commerce. His decision ruled that congress could under the Constitution regulate activities that affected the interstate…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays