Preview

Jetson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jetson
George Jetson, an employee of Spacely Construction Company, claims to have injured his back as a result of a fall while repairing the roof at of the 1313 Mockingbird Lane Apartments. He filed a lawsuit against Herman Munster, the owner of 1313 Mockingbird Lane Apartments, asking for damages of $1,500,000. George claims that the roof had rotten sections and that his fall could have been prevented if Mr. Munster had told Spacely Construction about the problem. Mr. Munster notified his insurance company, Dewey, Cheatem and Howe Insurance (DCH), of the lawsuit. DCH must defend Mr. Munster and decide what action to take regarding the lawsuit.

Some depositions and a series of discussions took place between both sides. As a result, George Jetson offered to accept a settlement of $750,000. Thus, one option is for DCH to pay George $750,000 to settle the claim. DCH is also considering making George a counteroffer of $400,000 in the hope that he will accept a lesser amount to avoid the time and cost of a trial. DCH’s preliminary investigation shows that George’s case is strong; DCH is concerned that George may reject their counteroffer and request a jury trial. DCH’s lawyer spent some time exploring George’s likely reaction if they make a counteroffer of $400,000.

The lawyer concluded that its is adequate to consider three possible outcomes to represents George’s possible reaction to a counteroffer of $400,000: (1) George will accept the counteroffer and the case will be closed; (2) George will reject the counteroffer and elect to have a jury decide the settlement amount; or (3) George will make a counteroffer to DCH of $600,000. If George does make a counteroffer, DCH decided that they will not make additional counteroffers. They will either accept George’s counteroffer of $600,000 or go to trial.

If the case goes to a jury trial, DCH considers three outcomes possible: (1) the jury may reject George’s claim and DCH will not be required to pay any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    ISSUES: Whether or not the Trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of Brown Realty Company will proceed for the reason that Donnie McGraw argues that the trail court erred when they granted Brown motion for traditional summary judgment on its breach of contract.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Week 3

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If Hal is adamant on a counter suit for thirty six thousand dollars, than a trial in front of a judge is the only option. This would come with some risk, win or lose Hal would have to pay Henry billable hours and Quick Takes would have negative publicity potentially resulting in lost future revenue.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL, a business patron.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue is to determine how the $300,000 fee that John received is to be…

    • 2389 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The background of this lawsuit is based on Debbie White suing Patrick Gibbs and his Tavern for the death of her husband . The reason why Debbie wants the bar to be held responsible is due to the fact that Mr. Edward Hard left intoxicated and crashed into Mrs. White 's car and killed her husband . The Gibbs feel his bar shouldn’t be held responsible due to the fact that the bartender didn’t see Mr. Hard intoxicated. Mr. Hard was also an ex-boyfriend of Debbie 's and the bar feels that the accident was intentional. Mr. Gibbs wants the court to dismiss the case based on summary judgment which is “a judgment requested by any party to a civil action to end the action when it is believed that there is no genuine issue or material fact in dispute” (Mosby’s Dictionary).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gm520 Es Essay Example

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1) Teddy’s Supplies’ CEO has asked you to advise him on the facts of the case and your opinion of their potential liability. He wants to settle the case. Write a memo to him which states your view of whether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws which apply and any precedential cases either for or against Teddy’s case which impact liability. Include in the memo your suggested “offer of settlement” to Virginia. Back up your offer using your analysis of the case against Teddy’s.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Here, plaintiff sufficiently set forth the terms of the parties' Property Settlement Agreement concerning plaintiff's interest in defendant's Deferred Compensation Agreement The issue of the case…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abc Case Study

    • 6644 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Issue: Will Jason prevail in a lawsuit against ABC Corporation for discriminating against Jason due to his physical disability and failing to meet his need for reasonable accommodation due to his use of a wheel chair?…

    • 6644 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Javier Galindo, the husband of the plaintiff, was sitting in his car in the driveway of Mr. Clark's property waiting to pick up his wife, who worked as a housekeeper for Mr. Clark, when a leaning 80 ft tree on an adjacent property fell on the plaintiff's husband's car and killed him. Ms. Galindo sued Mr. Clark for failing to notify her husband of the danger posed by the leaning tree.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Defendant Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They admit the Plaintiffs consulted the Third Defendant, but save as expressly admitted, they deny paragraph 15. The Plaintiffs signed in spite of the Third Defendant’s advice.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Teddy's Supplies' CEO has asked you to advise him on the facts of the case and your opinion of their potential liability. He wants to settle the case. Write a memo to him that states your view of whether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws that apply and any precedent cases either for or against Teddy's case that impact liability. Include in the memo your suggested "offer of settlement" to Virginia. Back up your offer using your analysis of the case against Teddy's.…

    • 2218 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Jones

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. The issues that the court had to decide is whether the motion judge erred by granting summary judgment and dismissing Jones claim for damages on the ground that Ontario law does not recognize the tort of beach of primacy.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    memo4

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    court proceeding, brought by or against the United States, to be awarded certain costs and…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics