Preview

Case Study of Donnie Mcgraw

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study of Donnie Mcgraw
BA 3310
Case Project Written Assignment
February 21, 2012

DONNIE McGRAW, Appellant v. BROWN REALTY COMPANY, Appellee

FACTS: Donnie McGraw signed a lease with Brown Realty Company located at 7307 South Westmorland Road, Dallas, Texas where he would be running a restaurant. On December 24, 2003 when McGraw signed the contract he agreed that the lease would be from February 15, 2004 through February 14, 2009 where he would be paying $3,450 a month a totaling $207, 000 at the end. On March 3, 2004 McGraw sent Gary Brown, the president of Brown Realty Company, a letter informing him of some equipment in need of repair in addition he sent him a second letter on October 5, 2004 complaining that the roof of the building was leaking, there was never a respond from Brown Realty. Documentation showed that McGraw made his rent payment on time from March through October of 2004; however in November rent payment was returned for insufficient funds which he then abandoned the premises in December.
Brown sued McGraw for breach of contract in early February seeking to collect the outstanding and unpaid rent, late charges, past due amounts and the remaining base rent at a total of $176,467.50. In late March, McGraw filed his original answer and affirmative defenses. Later in late June Brown Realty moved for traditional summary judgment on its breach of contract claim, he claimed it had mitigated its damages by securing a new tenant. McGraw then took action by filing his own traditional summary judgment on his defense. The trail court then in favor of Brown Realty entered summary judgment on their breach of contract asserted for $114,714.
ISSUES: Whether or not the Trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of Brown Realty Company will proceed for the reason that Donnie McGraw argues that the trail court erred when they granted Brown motion for traditional summary judgment on its breach of contract.

DECISION: The Court of appeals concluded that the trail court erred

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chi Hung Luu, appellee, leased premises in Houston Texas, from Merry Homes, Inc., with the intention of opening a bar or nightclub on the property. After Luu signed the lease, he submitted an application for a liquor license to the city of Houston. The city denied the application and Luu sought a declaratory judgment that the lease was void because it could not be performed legally. Merry Homes, appellant, counterclaimed for breach of contract and sought to recover eight months of unpaid rent.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eleven months after moving into the home, Pat received the half-million dollar installment check. Pat immediately went to Dan with a check for $275,000 and asked Dan to convey the property to her according to their agreement. Dan refused to accept the check and ordered Pat to move out.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tax Research Memo

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    You, Peter Sleiman, entered into a lease agreement with Blockbuster Video, Inc. Your lease stipulated that you purchase land, build a video rental store, and lease it to Blockbuster. You then set up an S Corporation, REE, Inc. and assigned the lease to REE. REE then obtained bank loans of approximately $1 million by pledging the property the S Corporation had purchased as collateral. Mr. Sleiman, you personally guaranteed the loans, however the bank did not contact you for repayment.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    OUTCOME: The court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, finding no abuse of discretion in the reduction of the duration of a covenant not to compete against appellee, former employee, where hardship to appellee by reinstatement of the expired injunction was a more onerous burden than was required to protect the business of appellant.…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DECISION: The federal district court granted CTG’s motion to enter a default judgment. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the lower court. Therefore, the appellate court held that “in light of Brotby’s horrible record of discovery abuses” and his “abiding contempt and continuing disregard for the court’s orders,” the lower court properly exercised its discretion in entering a default judgment against the defendant.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leg 100 Strayer

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Another complaint states that even though during the Harley Davidson Spring Bike Rally, a portion of Ocean Boulevard was closed off for an afternoon to control a fight between two motorcycle gangs, the Hell’s Angels and…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses, thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings’ breach of contract claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses. 4) Whether the District Court erred in imposing discovery sanctions against the Rothings. 5) Whether the District Court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Kallestad and denying the Rothings a hearing in respect to the calculation of attorney’s fees. (₱3-7)…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Jones

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. The issues that the court had to decide is whether the motion judge erred by granting summary judgment and dismissing Jones claim for damages on the ground that Ontario law does not recognize the tort of beach of primacy.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brown, J and Pawlowski, M (1995) A Casebook on Landlord and Tenant Law. Sweet and Maxwell London.…

    • 3622 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    business law

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nancy Johnston, appellant, brought suit against her employer, Del mar Distributing Co., Inc., appellee, alleging that her employment had been wrongfully terminated. Del Mar filed a motion for summary judgment in the trial court alleging that appellant’s pleadings failed to state a cause of action. After a hearing on the motion, the trial agreed with Del Mar and granted its motion for summary judgment.…

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The plaintiff in this case is Deborah White. Mrs. White is represented by moot court attorney Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants in this case are Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern. Moot court attorneys Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter represent the defendants.…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issues: Is section 8 of the contract an enforceable liquidated damage provision and not an unlawful penalty under Tennessee law and did Vanderbilt waive its right to liquidated damages? Was the Addendum to the contract enforceable? Was the Addendum not a valid and…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. ISSUE: The issue is “Did Court of Appeal of Louisiana approve lack of personal jurisdiction of an internet merchandiser?”…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Held. The trial court erred in granting defendant judgment on the pleadings because the plaintiff’s complaint states a cause of action for breach of an express contract, and can be amended to state a cause of action independent of allegations of express contract.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays