In this case study, I use POQ to calculate Optimal Quantities to Order because some the parts are made by company's plastic-molding machines in an assembly operations and units can be assumed that are received incrementally during production. We also have the following assumptions:

- Only one item is involved because each type of toy has its own assembly line, only one toy can be assembled at a time on this line.

- Annual Demand is known

- Usage rate is constant

- Usage occurs continually but production occurs periodically

- The production rate is constant ( i.e. production rate of Toy Auto is 3500,

Toy Truck, 1750; Toy Robot, 2333)

- There are no quantity discounts

Thus, we have to find out the Set up cost, Holding cost, Demand per year, Demand per week and production rate.

Therefore, we have

Ø Set up Cost:

According to the case study, we have the shop labor rate is the sum of $6 per hour for wages, 33% fringe benefits and $6 per hour charged for overhead. Moreover, line 1 has 10 workers who engage in assembly. Thus, the setup cost is:

S = 1 hour * 10 workers * ( $6 wages + 0.33*6 benefits+ $6 overhead )= $140

Ø Holding Cost:

There is some ambiguity here. The subcomponent costs in Exhibit 4 do not always add up to the Cost Each (e.g. the cost for Auto is $3.9) which is level 0 item cost. So I assumed that Line 1 labor costs (at a fully burdened $6 + 0.33*6 + $6 = $ 14 per hour) were not included.

Hence, Item Cost per unit is the sum o f Cost Each Item and the labor cost per item. You can see the results of Item Cost in Excel worksheet. (The labor cost per item here is equal to labor cost per hour times the hour to make one toy.

For example:

It takes 0.1 hour to make one Auto and the labor cost per hour is $14. Therefore, the labor cost per item is: C = 0.1 * 14 = $1.4 )

As a result, we can have the Holding Cost which i s 25% per year:

H = 0.25 * Item Cost per unit

(