Inuit Art Collection Essay

The Founding Identities gallery is a very different approach; it is a much bigger space with a mix of colonial pieces and indigenous art works. Like the Inuit Art Collection It is also like an art gallery simply filled with older art works. The art works date back to eighteenth century to present, many of which were from the French colonists. This type of exhibition relates to the question of how indigenous art should be displayed. This collection is a mix of First Nation’s people’s art and colonialist’s works from colonial time until now. This collection includes pieces from the colonial settlers and depicts the styles of art from that time and why is was of importance. For example portraits were a large indication of status and religious
In that area it is dim light and the silver shines, alongside sits a painting of Christ’s crucifixion, thus commemorating the catholic religion. Right in the entrance of the exhibition there is another commemoration to Christ, literally a wood sculpture of Christ’s crucifixion. The premise of this exhibition seems to commemorate the defeat of the colonists who stole the First Nations Lands. As personal opinion unlike the The Inuit Art Collection I feel as though this collection is somewhat disrespectful. The entire collection repeats the tragedy of the First Peoples land being stolen, furthermore it has works of colonist’s artists depicting indigenous peoples through studying their ways. It just seems as though there is something unethical about the way the works are presented. A person of First nations decent today visiting this exhibition would most likely feel hurt after viewing this collection. There are landscape paintings of original people’s lands but then right after follows landscapes of colonisation of the territory. It is questionable whether this is an appropriate context for some