Preview

Insider Trading , Jeffery Archer

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
415 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Insider Trading , Jeffery Archer
Insider Trading Article

Q1. What is Jeffery Archer accused of?

Jeffery Archer is accused of insider trading with the shares of Anglia TV. Jeffery bought shares for the "inside information" of the companies dealing account, the day after the last board meeting but before the bid was announced. He should have known that even if he found out insider information from his wife the law makes it clear that he cannot deal or trade with that stock. It would be considered unfair to the rest of the shareholders, because other shareholders would not have the same information like Jeffery. As we know the buying and selling of shares must be based on public information

Q2. Who is Mary Archer and which insider trading rule, may she have violated?

Mary Archer is the wife of Jeffery Archer, and also she is a director for Anglia TV Company. The insider trading rule that Mary may have violated is that if she did tell her husband about the insider information from board meetings, she should beware that director's close relatives are not allowed to deal ahead of takeover bids. Also questions arise in the article, that as it is accepted that Mary did not tell her husband about the bid, how much information has found out without her knowledge. If she did share information with her husband than she violate the rule of insider trading which states that:"Insider shouldn't communicate private information to others who are likely to use it".

Q3. Who is Brooke Saib and which insider trading rule has he violated?

Brook Saib was the aide of Jeffery Archer. The article shows that he has access to brokers and invests a lot. What happened was that Jeffery bought shares through a different broker than the usual, with the name of Brook Saib and the profits transferred to Saib's account. The odd thing is that also a profit of 80,000 pounds has left Saib's account. And over that, he said that "dare not say" where the money is. Also there was an issue of Taxes,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    This shows unintentional amoral management. Martha did not think about the business activity in ethical terms. She just reacted like any other human being would in this situation. Or she could have been telling the truth about selling the stock if got to $60 and below. It is all circumstantial. In reading about this case I did not see where there was hard evidence of insider…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    He incorporated a company named Salomon and Co. Ltd. He took over the entire business of a running concern. Salomon and the seven subscribers to the memorandum were he and his family members. Salomon and his two sons were the Directors of the Company. The business of the company was transferred for £30000. Salomon took 20000 share of £1 each and debentures worth 10000 in…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 250 Week 4 Disc1

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1985 R. Foster Winans a columnist for “The Wall Street Journal” was convicted of giving information to two stock brokers he was writing and article about in his column “Heard On The Street. Foster was charged with insider trading. The stockbrokers make a whopping 690,000 and Winans cut was 31,000. I thin k this case does meet the requirements of inside trading established by the Supreme Court in the case U.S. vs. O’Hagen because the Foster leaked information about contents of a column , “Heard on the Street” before publication. The leaks allowed his stockbroker friends to make trades in anticipation of the impact the column would have and allow them to make a profit before the new hit the street. According to Lawrence inside trading is A person who trades on information that he or she knew was supposed to be confidential is guilty of misappropriation, regardless of whether the trader is directly connected to the company whose shares were purchased. This new law covers anyone who learned and traded on information they knew was illegal. It does not cover people who come across information just by chance…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sec vs Ginsberg

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Scott Ginsburg served as chairman and CEO of Evergreen Media Corporation, an owner and operator of a group of radio stations. Ginsburg then began to show interest in acquiring EZ, another corporation that owned radio stations. After a brief meeting with Alan Box, the CEO of EZ, a phone call was made of which only the duration, 26 minutes, is known. The next Mark Ginsburg, the brother of CEO Scott Ginsburg, purchased 3800 shares of stock in EZ after discussing the purchase of this stock with Jordan Ginsburg, the father of he and Mark. Scott Ginsburg then talked to EZ’s investment banker, discussed the possibility of a bid, and signed a confidentiality agreement on July 16, the same day that Jordan Ginsburg purchased 20,000 shares of stock in EZ. The following day Scott received full disclosure of EZ’s financial status. Mark and Jordan continued…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 27th, 2001 Martha Stewart was contacted with some information that was clearly not public knowledge at the time. Her broker, Peter Bacanovic, had attempted to contact Stewart to inform her that ImClone shares were going downward and the Waksals were selling all their shares. Under the Client Information Privacy Policy of Merrill Lynch it clearly states that they “do not release client information, except upon a client’s authorization”. Bacanovic had ignored the policy and had chosen to inform Stewart of the Waksals selling of shares. From the beginning of this investigation, all parties involved claimed that the only reason for Stewart selling her shares was because of an agreement between her and Bacanovic that if the stock price…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anheuser-Busch Company was in the verge of fulfilling their diversification strategy. They were negotiating for the acquisition of Campbell Taggart, opting to pay $570 million for the said company. The acquisition was pretty much successful until the Securities and Exchange Committee started an investigation regarding the unusual activity of the Campbell Taggart Stock. There is a speculation that there was Insider Trading of the Campbell Taggart stock. Evidences lead that Mr. Paul Thayer, an executive of Anheuser-Busch, has leaked information to his friends about the acquisition of Campbell Taggart.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay, “The Fake Trade,” Dana Thomas makes a direct statement, “Most important, we need to spread the word on the devastating effects counterfeiting has on society today.” She also goes on to say, “But the reality is that we’re all victims of counterfeiting, whether from the loss of jobs or of tax revenue that could fund our schools and our roads…” Since this is her belief her purpose is to inform readers about counterfeit goods. She gives many statistics on how bad counterfeiting goods can be. “Since 1982, the global trade in counterfeit and pirated goods has grown from an estimated $5.5 billion to approximately $600 billion annually.” She continues to give a few examples of counterfeit goods. “The Food and Drug Administration has…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    directors, etc… Although it is said that he did not hold part in insider trading, his leak…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. I’m convinced that Martha Stewart did commit the crime of insider trading, on December 27, 2001. Looking at the events leading to her decision to liquidate her shares in ImClone, it is evident that she was in possession of material information that was not available to the public yet. The fact that her Financial Advisor, Mr. Bacanovic had instructed Faneuil to call Martha Stewart and let her know of the selling frenzy that was going on with the Waksal’s, which suggests that Peter Bacanovic was in possession of insider information about ImClone company, which he shared with Martha and advised her to sell her shares before the stock plummets proves that, Stewart was aware of upcoming changes effecting ImClone stock beforehand. Another incident that suggests Martha Stewart’s quilt is the fact that when Peter Bacanovic asked Faneuil to call Martha and break the news to her, Faneuil hesitated asking Peter whether or not it was permitted to share that sort of sensitive information, with another client. Merrill Lynch’s Privacy Policy prohibits the release of client information, except upon client’s…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On December 27 , 2001 Martha Stewart, America's beloved housewife, sold her shares of ImClone after she received specific inside information regarding the status of the companies business. A series of events led to an investigation, interviews, indictments, a trial & sentencing of Martha Stewart to 5 months in a minimum security prison camp and then 5 months of home confinement.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A white collar crime is a category that includes embezzlement, insider trading and bank fraud just to name a few. These crimes are committed for monetary gain and are highly illegal.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ellen Scott Slacks

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Third, Ellen's partner regularly and vigorously traded the JOSB stock over the past year, both call and put orders. So the activity by Ellen's partner was not out of the ordinary. This would be a defense to insider trading even if the trade occurred before the issuance of non-public information and Ellen and/or Ellen' partner were an…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important to recognize that this is a fallacy that the Stockbroker committed because people, especially the men on the jury, can easily take this as fact and continue to base their decision-making on something that does not determine…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roger's dilemma case

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The new deal would make Dugas Incorporated stock price go from his current $3.14 to maybe $10 or $15 up. Without thinking about the consequences, Roger accessed SP’s operating account and used every last dollar to purchase 470,000 shares in Dugas Incorporated. Roger’s conduct was in violation of Part A of SP’s Code of Ethics, as he engaged in insider trading, by illegally making profit by trading on the basis of nonpublic information.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ian M Ramsay Harold Ford Professor of Commercial Law and Director, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne David B Noakes Solicitor, Allen Allen & Hemsley, Sydney, and Research Associate, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne There is a significant amount of literature by commentators discussing the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. However, there has not been a comprehensive empirical study of the Australian cases relating to this doctrine. In this article, the authors present the results of the first such study. Some of the findings are (i) there has been a substantial increase in the number of piercing cases heard by courts over time; (ii) courts are more prepared to pierce the corporate veil of a proprietary company than a public company; (iii) piercing rates decline as the number of shareholders in companies increases; (iv) courts pierce the corporate veil less frequently when piercing is sought against a parent company than when piercing is sought against one or more individual shareholders; and (v) courts pierce more frequently in a contract context than in a tort context. ____________________________________________________________…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics