Preview

Industry Analysis: Soft Drinks

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Industry Analysis: Soft Drinks
Meghan Deichert, Meghan Ellenbecker, Emily Klehr,
Leslie Pesarchick, & Kelly Ziegler
Strategic Management in a Global Context
February 22, 2006 1
Industry Analysis: Soft Drinks Barbara Murray (2006c) explained the soft drink industry by stating, “For years the story in the nonalcoholic sector centered on the power struggle between…Coke and Pepsi. But as the pop fight has topped out, the industry 's giants have begun relying on new product flavors…and looking to noncarbonated beverages for growth.” In order to fully understand the soft drink industry, the following should be considered: the dominant economic factors, five competitive sources, industry trends, and the industry’s key factors. Based on the analyses of the industry, specific recommendations for competitors can then be created.
Dominant Economic Factors Market size, growth rate and overall profitability are three economic indicators that can be used to evaluate the soft drink industry. The market size of this industry has been changing.
Soft drink consumption has a market share of 46.8% within the non-alcoholic drink industry, illustrated in Table 1. Datamonitor (2005) also found that the total market value of soft drinks reached $307.2 billion in 2004 with a market value forecast of $367.1 billion in 2009. Further, the 2004 soft drink volume was 325,367.2 million liters (see Table 2). Clearly, the soft drink industry is lucrative with a potential for high profits, but there are several obstacles to overcome in order to capture the market share. The growth rate has been recently criticized due to the U.S. market saturation of soft drinks. Datamonitor (2005) stated, “Looking ahead, despite solid growth in consumption, the global soft drinks market is expected to slightly decelerate, reflecting stagnation of market prices.” The change is attributed to the other growing sectors of the non-alcoholic industry including tea and coffee (11.8%)



Cited: American Beverage Association (2005). Soft Drink Facts. Retrieved February 21, 2006 from http://www.ameribev.org/variety/facts.asp Cadbury Schweppes. (2004). 2004 Annual Report. Retrieved February 17, 2006 from http://www.cadburyschweppes.com Datamonitor. (2005, May). Global Soft Drinks: Industry Profile. New York. Reference Code: 0199-0802 Hein, Kenneth. (2004). Brand Loyalty 2004. Retrieved February 12, 2006 from http://www.brandkeys.com/news/press/102504Brandweek.Loyalty.pdf Murray, Barbara. (2006a). The Coca-Cola Company. Hoovers. Retrieved February 13, 2006, from http://premium.hoovers.com/subscribe/co/factsheet.xhtml?ID=10359 Murray, Barbara. (2006b). Pepsi Co. Hoovers. Retrieved February 13, 2006, from http://premium.hoovers.com/subscribe/co/profile.xhtml?ID=11166 Murray, Barbara. (2006c). Carbonated Beverages. Hoovers. Retrieved February 13, 2006, from http://premium.hoovers.com/subscribe/ind/overview.xhtml?HICID=1049 Murray, Barbara. (2006d). Cadbury Schweppes Inc. Hoovers. Retrieved February 13, 2006, from http://premium.hoovers.com/subscribe/co/profile.x html?ID=41767 Murray, Barbara. (2006e). Comparison Data. Hoovers. Retrieved February 13, 2006, from http://premium.hoovers.com/subscribe/co/fin/comparison.xhtml?ID=10359 PepsiCo Inc. (2004). 2004 Annual Report. Retrieved February 17, 2006 from http://www.pepsico.com Sicher, J. D. (2005). Beverage Digest/Maxwell ranks U.S. soft drink industry for 2004. Retrieved February 10, 2006 from http://www.beverage-digest.com/pdf/top-10_2005.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When talking about market share, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have the lions share. They have dominated the industry over the past 40 years with Coca-Cola leading in the category in 2004 (C256). With little resistance from Cadbury Schweppes, the distant third largest company in the industry, the two companies’ main focus was to increase market demand by outdoing each other in promotions, advertisements, and corporate acquisitions. Rivalry and power struggle have defined the existence of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, looking for a competitive advantage to gain an edge on the competition. This rivalry has been to the benefit to the companies, the industry, and its consumers as a whole. Both have learned to not only stay afloat, but flourish in an industry that has constantly grown since Coca-Cola began advertising in 1891 (C258). They did this by increasing the demand in their products, and gaining brand loyalty by their consumers. In some instances, they were selling cases of Dasani (Coca-Cola) and Aquafina (PepsiCo) for less than the cost of bottling it (C267).…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Industry Analysis Csd

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The industry of Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) is highly concentrated. The three major companies, Coca Cola, PepsiCo, and Cadbury Schweppes accounted in 1998 for more than 90% of market share by case volume –Exhibit 1-.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robert Mondavi Case Study

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages

    [ 2 ]. See Exhibit 1 of the HBS case Study „Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi 2006“ by D.B. Yoffie.…

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, you will find financial comparisons on both PepsiCo and the Coca-Cola Corporation. Some increases in certain areas of one company and some decreases in areas of another company. There are vertical analysis, horizontal analysis, and ratios of both the industries. These are still the two leading soft drinks in the industry, and most like will remain the leaders in the upcoming years.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The beverage industry serves an incredible large market. In 2009 alone, the beverage market consumed more than 458 million liters of beverage, resulting in over $1.58 trillion in sales for the industry. Although there is a declining trend in the consumption of carbonated soft drinks in the United States, as of 2009, carbonated soft drinks still accounts for the lion share of the U.S. beverage market with 48.2% of the market; while bottle water and fruit juice account for 29.2% and 12.4%, respectively. The remaining market space was occupied by the alternative beverages segment, which includes sports drinks, flavored or enhanced water, and energy drinks with 4.0%, 1.6%, and 1.2%, respectively…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000, carbonated soft drink retail sales were estimated $60.3 billion, however, soft drink consumption growth has slowed in recent years. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the U.S. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/ Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. These three companies market the top ten brands account for 73% of soft drink sales in the U.S. Dr. Pepper/ Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten brands: Dr. Pepper and 7UP.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The competition within the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been remarkable ever since Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886, and further intensified when Pepsi was introduced in 1893. Ever since then, the CSD industry has been dominated by these two companies, with Coke taking the lead in the early stage, followed by Pepsi doubled its market share between 1950 and 1970 by offering its concentrate at a lower price than its competitor. The CSD industry has been profitable historically due to numerous reasons. Firstly, in the world’s largest market for CSD products, consumption had been growing at a steady rate of 3% annually from 1970 to 2000 in the U.S., marking a high growth stage in the industry life cycle (Appendix B). This allowed both Coke and Pepsi (C&P) to achieve annual sales growth of around 10%, while competing head-to-head against each other and other smaller CSD producers. Competition between C&P reinforced their brand image, as the increase in marketing efforts could be transferred into profit and sales growth when the overall demand was increasing in a growing industry. However, the increasing industry volume was largely obtained by C&P, leaving other smaller firms vulnerable with stagnated growth opportunity. Secondly, according to Porter’s Five Forces analysis in Appendix A, high barrier for new entrants, low bargaining power of suppliers of both concentrate producers and bottlers, moderate buyer’s bargaining power and low degree of threats of substitutes prior to 2000, have been favorable to the high profitability and growth of the CSD industry. In terms of concentrate producers, the manufacture process involves little fixed costs and capital investments. This ensures high level of gross margin for them and frees up funds for marketing related expenditures. As the industry became more consolidated, large firms such as C&P gained pricing power over bottlers through master price contracts. For bottlers, even though heavy capital…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) industry is enormous. In 2000, more Americans drank soft drinks than water. The production and distribution of soft drinks involve concentrate producers (basic flavors), bottlers (add sweetener and carbonated water), and retailers. Of all the retailers available for distribution to customers, grocery stores and supermarkets account for about 31% of sales. There are three major competitors in the soft drink market (Coca-Cola, 44.1%; Pepsi-Cola, 31.4%; Dr Pepper/Seven Up, 14.7%). Each competitor spends a lot of money on advertising their brand through promotions, and consumer price discounting. Concentrate producers and bottlers usually share advertising costs because bottlers can target markets locally while producers focus on the bigger picture.…

    • 3374 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Briefly describe the basic structure of the CSD industry and how it has evolved.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historically, the soft carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been valued at $74 billion in the United States. In order to understand the reasons why the industry has been hugely profitable despite the ‘Cola Wars’, an examination of the CSD industry with Porter’s five forces analysis will be conducted. As market leaders, the analysis will be centred on both Coke and Pepsi (hereafter “C&P”).…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cola Wars Continue

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When it comes to soft drinks there are two top soft drink brands that come to mind, Coke and Pepsi. These two brands were invented in the 1800s and produced tasteful drinks that could be acquired at the nearest drinking fountain. The first drink produced by both companies, Coca-Cola by Coke and Pepsi-Cola by Pepsi, fought neck and neck from their early existence. Coke and Pepsi being competitors of each other from that day on went on to produce numerous of drinks that mirrored each other in some way over the next 100 years. In this case study that I extensively read I became more familiarized with both brands and more knowledgeable of their backgrounds and competiveness amongst each other. The primary focus is how the brands were conducting business in the 1990s. The following two questions have been posed and I will answer them with supporting information from the reading itself:…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty first century, Harvard Business School, (9-702-442), p.1-24.…

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    launched in the market. The potential of the industry can be gauged by the fact that…

    • 3711 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historically, the soft drink industry has been extremely profitable. Long time industry leaders Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola largely drive the profits in the industry, relying on Porter’s five forces model to explain the attractiveness of the soft drink market. These forces allowed Coke and Pepsi to maintain large growth until 1999, and also explain the challenges that each company is currently facing. The relative duopoly that Coke and Pepsi share in the industry allows for higher profits, while also maintaining enough competition to promote firm improvement.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The basic subject matter of the research, comparative analysis of Soft Drinks and Juices is focused to study the mind/taste of different age group of people.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics