Preview

Indian Removal Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
452 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Act
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a heated topic in Congress. Defend the passage or rejection of the Act with reference to the moral, political, constitutional and practical concerns of a congressman.

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was at the time, thought to be justified and acceptable. There were two groups, the people who wanted the Indian’s gone, and the people who believed they should be allowed to stay. I believe forcing the Indians out of their territory was immoral, had no effect on the state of Georgia, and it was an abuse of power. When the Indians were being removed from their territory, they were lead out at gunpoint by our military. It’s immoral because there were 17,000 Indians and 4,000 died due to dehydration, starvation, and disease. The Cherokee had rights given to them. “They were granted their separate existence, as a political community, undisturbed possession and full enjoyment of their lands, within certain boundaries, which are duly defined and fully described and the protection of the United States against all in interference with, or encroachments upon, their rights, by any people, State, or nation,” argues a Maine Senator. The Indian Removal Act disregards every set of promises we have given to them.
"What is the population of Georgia, where there is no room for these few Indians? It is less than seven to the square mile. We, Sir, in Massachusetts, have seventy-four to the square mile, and space for a great many more,” states a Congressman. The occupation of Indians in Georgia had little effect on the society or development of it. Georgia wanted to “consolidate their society” but they weren’t going to strengthen their community by kicking people out.
President Andrew Jackson and President James Monroe, both were for the Indian Removal Act. President Jackson asks, “What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive republic?” The Constitution of 1789 gave Congress the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles were the tribes that occupied many areas in Georgia, including the Moultrie area prior to establishment. In 1829, newly elected President Andrew Jackson started working on a strong removal policy. After the Indian Removal Act in 1830 was implemented, Indians were forcefully pushed out of the state causing them to move west.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act called for the government to make treaties that required Native Americans to relocate west. Jackson thought that this policy was “just and liberal.” He thought the Native Americans would be able to keep their way of life. He was wrong. The Indian Removal Act brought a lot of hardship to the Native Americans. It also forever changed the relationship between whites and Native Americans. Before Jackson passed this act, he gave the Native Americans two choices. The two choices were that they could take on white culture and become citizens of the United States, or they could move to the Western territories and keep their…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many opinions on Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy was an act of cruelty or a fair policy, but the policy did not benefit Native Americans.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jackson was out of office when the Indian Removal act was actually carried out, he had set its path into motion, and shares just as much credit for the act if not more than his presidential and ideological successor, Martin Van Buren. As Jackson saw it, the tribes were not part of the union, but sovereign nations, so why should they have any sort of protection from the federal government? The is the notable minority as stated earlier. Their land, unfortunately according to Jackson, belonged in and to the states they resided in. Jackson was also a strong supporter of…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zinn Notes

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. Contrast Thomas Jefferson’s views as Secretary of State concerning Indian policy with those during his presidency. Why did his views change?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While President Andrew Jackson is often made out to be a villain for his treatment of the Native Americans, he is not to blame for the massive loss of life the tribes experienced. Most of the non-natives in the South, especially Georgia, supported the Indian Removal Act, shaping the South’s political views and putting pressure on Congress, the Senate, and Jackson himself. Eager to take on Native American lands, appetites were large for the Native Americans to be removed.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case Worcester vs. Georgia. Cherokee Indians fought for their right to control their land which was roughly ¼ the size of Georgia. “We have a perfect and original right to remain in our lands without interruption or molestation.” (Document B) Georgia fought to have them removed saying that they were uncivilized and couldn’t assimilate into American culture, and that they made a contract with tribe leaders. In the case the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokees. John Marshall said “The Cherokee Indians have an unquestionable right to their territory until title should be extinguished by voluntary cession to the United States” (Document B). Jackson disregarded this ruling and had the Indian Removal Act of 1830 put in place where he forced the Indians west of the Mississippi River along what is now known as “The Trail of…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 1830, President Andrew Jackson (1829–1837) signed the Indian Removal Act, which would take tribes of eastern Indians, living in settled states, and resettle them in specially designated districts west of the Mississippi River in Indian Territory (now the state of Oklahoma). Many tribes were affected by the Indian Removal Act. Most notably, the Cherokees, Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, and Seminoles tribes were subjected to eviction (O’Neill 11). By the large, these tribes were known as the "Five Civilized Tribes" (weiser). The tribes had their own customs, traditions, government, and territories. Until When the Indian Removal Act was implemented, however, they found themselves equally casted out. Though the terms of their departures diverse, the Five…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There were several moral aspects of moving the Indians that were brought up during this time. The Secretary of War, William H. Crawford, said, “Intrusions upon the lands of the friendly Indian tribes, is not only a violation of the laws, but in direct opposition to the policy of government towards its savage neighbors…” while he was talking to some military commanders (Document G). He was trying to get the point across that it was morally wrong to remove the Indians from the lands that they have lived on for so long, especially since they had not done anything to justify the actions that the American Government were attempting to take against them. There was a collection of photographs from the Georgia Historical Society that contained a picture of the Vann House, built by James Vann who was a Cherokee leader of mixed blood. His estate was beautiful and very well built. It showed the intelligence of the Indians and that they were not all primitive like some would believe (Document L).…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson Villain

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1814, President Jackson commanded the military force that defeated the Creek nation. In the Creek nation’s defeat, the Creeks “lost 22 million acres of land in southern Georgia and central Alabama” (PBS, Indian Removal). Andrew Jackson championed the malicious and imperial “Indian Removal Act” through both of the houses of Congress in 1830. The Indian Removal Act permitted President Andrew Jackson to “disavow earlier treaty commitments and force the 74,000 Indians remaining in the East and the South to move to federal lands west of the Mississippi River” (Shi and Tindall 330). Under these agreements, the Native Americans were to voluntarily hand over their lands “east of the Mississippi and in exchange for lands to the west” (PBS, Indian Removal). Despite the rhetoric proposing a voluntary and fair exchange of their lands, the Indian Removal Act cleared the way for the U.S. militia to drive out the Native Americans from their own land with brute force under President Jackson’s…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a policy established through congress, that allowed the federal government to move the Native Americans out of their lands further west. When white Georgians discovered gold in western Georgia, they requested that the Cherokee Natives be removed so a gold mine could be established. In the Cherokee v. Georgia case, the Cherokee were found, by the Supreme Court, to have their own sovereignty and that the U.S state could not interfere with their land without permission. However, president Jackson disregarded the Supreme Courts decision and revoked the the Cherokee's rights to their land and began their removal. The Nation was forced to travel one thousand miles, leaving Georgia for Oklahoma on a grueling walk…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, this approved that the President Andrew Jackson could remove all Native Americans from their land and to arrange settlements of evacuation with every single Indian tribe living east of the Mississippi. After the Indian Removal act was established Georgia, surveyors and squatter entered Cherokee lands, instantly focusing on the Cherokee tribe, they chose to battle back in government court. The Cherokee country brought a suit against the condition of Georgia in the US Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall said the case needed purview since the Cherokees were not US residents or a free country. This expressing all Indians are not genuinely American subjects. Following in the following year a…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays