Preview

How Far Do You Agree That Garibaldi Played a More

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Do You Agree That Garibaldi Played a More
How far do you agree that Garibaldi played a more important part than Cavour in the Unification of Italy?
Garibaldi and Cavour were two very influential people in the unification for Italy and without them the unification may not have occurred. Although they both ultimately wanted the same thing, the unification of Italy, they went about it in different ways. Cavour was a highly intellectual man, who orchestrated things from a political stand point ensuring good relations with countries like France, of which without the unification may never have succeeded. Garibaldi on the other hand was more of people’s person, a leader of men who was very direct and his actions such as the taking of Naples and Sicily allowed Italy to unite properly and not remain just an extended Piedmont.
Cavour’s main contribution to the unification of Italy would probably be the fact he had gotten France and Napoleon on side and without this it is very doubtful that the Risorgimento would have succeeded. Cavour did this through politics and this also got Italy recognised at a world stage, gaining a seat the peace conference held in Paris after the Crimean war held in 1856. This conference allowed Cavour to become friends with Napoleon, and this was a very important part in the unification of Italy as it would foreshadow things to come. However how much Cavour wanted Piedmont to enter the war is questionable and was probably more down to Victor Emmanuel. Cavour’s role as Prime minister was very important as it allowed him to make these ties with France and show his political cunningness, e.g. at the meeting in Plombières where he gained the support of France against Austria. It also allowed him to act through the king Victor Emmanuel, and while Cavour himself wasn’t such a popular public figure he could ensure the King was by writing such speeches for him as the ‘Grido di dolore’ something which became a catch phrase amongst Italian people. Possibly it was best for Cavour that he wasn’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cavour and Realpolitik

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Napoleon III agreed to help Cavour in planning Piedmont's war against Austria. The Emperor wanted to drive the Austrians out of Italy once and for all but did not want a revolution because then he would not end up as the legal sovereign of the richest and most powerful half of Italy, and hence would in practice dominate the whole peninsula. Camillo di Cavour wanted the principle of nationalities to be realized and that Savoy, be reunited with France. He wanted The Emperor to supply munitions and aid in obtaining money to support the war effort.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let the Marches, and Umbria, and Sabina, and the Roman Campania, and the land of Naples rise, so as to bring division into the forces of our enemy!…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The north of Italy was largely controlled by Austria, and their military prowess allowed them to greatly dominate the north and quickly stop any revolts…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unification of Italy Dbq

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Those who agreed that Italy should be unified argued that Italy would not survive in the separated states, would be vulnerable to invasions, and would ultimately be weaker overall. Giuseppe Mazzini, an attorney who was exiled from Piedmont and wanted Italy to be unified so that he could return to his home said, “Unity, because without unity there can be no true nation, and without unity there is no strength.” (DOC 1) People for unification believed the combining of Italy states would be beneficial in the end. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest from Piedmont, said, “The benefits Italy would gain from a political confederation under the moderating authority of the pontiff are beyond enumeration…would increase the strength of the various princes without damaging their independence; it would remove the causes of disruptive wars and revolutions at home, and make foreign invasions impossible. (DOC 3) Some civilians of these states also agreed that the unification of Italy would be just fine. Jessie White Mario, an English journalist who is obviously an opinionated individual being in the field of journalism said, “…Italy would have been free from foreigners, would have been free, independent, and united, had not monarchy stepped in and substituted the petty longings of dynastic ambition for the great national aim.” (DOC 9) On the other hand, some people felt that the unification of Italy would not bring success, but failure.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1796, a French leader named Napoleon Bonaparte lead his army to attack Italy. Napoleon was an innovator and an opportunist. Although Napoleon had his own reasons for taking over Northern Italy, France mainly wanted Italy for financial and strategic reasons. At this time, Austria owned a portion of Italy, but France wanted to keep this land from them because “it was an ideal outpost for defense and offense” (Sarti 19). Only a few months into Napoleon’s rule, he had changed the political landscape of Italy which had been in place for years. After the Jacobins took power in Genoa in the north and the Roman Republic replaced papal rule in Rome, the Parthenopean Republic replaced the royal court, who escaped to…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Italian Unification- unification movement in Italy shifted to Sardinia-Piedmont under King Victor Emmanuel, Count Cavour, and Garibaldi.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Review Sheet

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Giuseppe Mazzini: He organized the revolutionary society called Young Italy, founded newspapers, wrote pamphlets and encouraged unification of Italy. He aroused devotion and the spirit of nationalism in the hearts of many Italians.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nationalism DBQ

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another group of people that was heavily impacted by the effects of nationalism were the Italian people. In 1850, Italy was ruled by many different empires. They were separate states with no unification whatsoever. The Northern regions were richer than the south, and the two areas had nothing in common. Italy had lack of unity, which is shown in the fact that Mazzini wanted a Republic, the Pope wanted a confederation, and Charles Albert wanted a kingdom. When Cavour rose as a prominent nationalist figure in Italy, he used many…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mazzini was an important figurehead for the unification of Italy, historians such as Pearce and Stiles state that that 'no one else campaigned for so long or so tirelessly in the cause of a united Italy'. He had extremely radical and liberal ideas about how Italy should be unified, and some historians…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, Italy’s government was deteriorating and so it was evident that communist Italy was a failure. Mussolini had led the Italian population to believe that he and his fascist party were their only hope into putting an end to the chaos in Rome, and re-establish order and bring about the once great Italy, just as Caesar had in the time of the great Romans. This was appealing to the Italian people, as the city or Rome seemed to have fallen into ruins, taking advantage of this, Mussolini had conveyed himself as their saviour. Fascist ideology stressed the importance of the heroic leader and strong government. This was in contrast to the weaknesses of Liberal Italy, characterised by the failure to provide strong and stable government and so Italian people found it easier to give praise to a person rather than a concept, and Fascism seemed to embody elements of both left and right wing policies. He used powerful slogans such as “Mussolini is always right, believe, obey, fight.”…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two leaders did not really have any goals in common, but they each had their fair share of them, and plenty more. They treated their citizens rather the same, but they had a few differences, such as Mussolini not creating purges because he did not trust a group of people.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He ruled Rome during a time of declining prosperity. Again, he ruled during a time when Rome was in constant battle with the Parthians, Germans, and Britons. However, he did try to improve his home while he ruled it. He was a man concerned with public welfare. He always made choices that helped the people instead of himself. He was not a selfish ruler as some rulers were. During his reign, he did such things as open schools, orphanages, and hospitals for the poor people in Rome. He also tried to "humanize" criminal laws, and have masters treat their slaves in a humane way.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pregnancy Trap by Gerry Garibaldi creates the idea that society has become more accepting of teenage pregnancy (634-38). When Garibaldi learns all of his favorite girls are pregnant, he asks some of them, “Do you think getting pregnant when you’re a teenager is a good thing or a bad thing?” (635). One student, Nicole proudly states, “My mom and my grandma both got pregnant when they were teens and they’re good mothers” another student and mother, Maria says, “Nobody gets married anymore, mister” (636). None of the girls has a problem with being or becoming pregnant or unwed mothers. They become a “heroic figure” after getting pregnant as the fathers take on a “he-man” role for having impregnated the girls.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays