Preview

How Did The Article 231 Cause Ww1

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2778 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Article 231 Cause Ww1
Centennial College
The Making of the Modern World

Corse Instructor: Dr. Jacob Meunier
Group Number: 03
Name: Ng Sze Wing
Date: 23th March 2015
Topic 2

By studying and discuss from the long- and short-term causes of the war, to understand how accurate was Article 231 on placing full blame for World War I on Germans.

In June 1919, the treaty signed in this day had ended the war between defeated Germany and the victorious Allies. A one and a half year negotiation on armistice settled till the Treaty of Versailles produced, which becomes the most controversial treaty in the twentieth century. The most contentious part of this peace accord was the Article 231 had imputed full blame for World War I on Germany. However, if we take a careful analysis on the long and the short-term causes, it leads to a just conclusion that the Article 231 was injustice, biased, and inaccurate,
…show more content…
As the agreement signed when alliance formed, it also resulted in the outbreak of WWI. That is, despite the alliance or entente was founded, but the ally itself were also worried their alliance would collapse. In view of it, to avert betrayal and isolation from ally, they had to signed the secret military treaty to compel their ally support them. When WWI begun, the ally pattern reveals that the military treaty was correlated to the outbreak of WWI in a great extent. Which, when assassination at Sarajevo happened (819), Austro-Hungarian declared war with Serbia who supported by Russia, France was ally with Russia, on the other side, German support Austria because of the agreement, and thus, it indirectly leads to German battle with France as they were enemies. Ultimately, it also reveals that Article 231 was inaccurate as Germany was not the country initiate the begin of WWI; it was injustice to put all blame on German to accept the war guilty

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 4 "The Great War"

    • 2432 Words
    • 11 Pages

    M _ilitarism -building up a nation’s armed forces in preparation for war. Endless planning makes war more likely.…

    • 2432 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the main clauses of the Treaty was clause 231, this clause states, "The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies."1 This clause blamed Germany for all the actions and consequences, they had to be responsible. If Germany really had caused the war and was responsible for all damages, the Treaty would then be fair, but it wasn 't them that had caused all these disturbances. One of the main causes of the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by Gavrilo Princip, a Serbian terrorist. This dispute was between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, Germany only offered to help when needed. Besides this, Germany was not the first country to mobilize or attack. They were blamed for the actions of other countries and for any country these verdicts are disgraceful and unfair.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | 1.) Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia got involved to defend Serbia. Germany seeing Russia mobilizing, declared war on Russia, fearing an attack from the north. France was then drawn in against Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany attacked France through Belgium pulling Britain into war because of location. Then Japan entered the war. Later, Italy and the United States would enter on the side of the allies.2.) It ruined the Schlieffen Plan once and for all, France would not be knocked out in six weeks, and all hopes of a shot war were dashed.3.) The Germans would have to face full scale war on two fronts, which they had never intended. 1.) The First Battle of the Marne effectively halted the German offensive towards Paris and thereby keeping France in the war. Both the Allies and the Germans suffered a tremendous amount of casualties and were quite exhausted. 2.) There was time for the British navy to bring its crippling blockade to bear on Germany's port. 3.) The immediate cause of America's entry into World War 1 in April 1917 was the German announcement of unrestricted submarine warfare, and the subsequent sinking of ships with Americans on board (the…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article 231 was also known as “War Guilt.” It placed sole responsibility for the war on Germany and forced Germany to pay for war damages. With these blames came built up anger in Germany because they thought that the financial penalties were unjust. Propaganda that followed with Article 231 only further angered Germany. With the help of Hitler, Germany began revolting.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany Article 231

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 231 in Source A states that Germany was the sole reason for causing the war and therefore they should pay for any damage caused by the war. Source B shows what the Germans thought about Article 231 and how they did not agree with it as they alone were not guilty of having caused the war. Although Germany was involved in the war, they did not believe that they started the war. Ultimately, the war started after a Serbian killed the Austria-Hungary heir to the throne and Austria-Hungary fought back. Germany was only involved in the war because Russia attacked Austria-Hungary, with whom Germany had signed an alliance. This allegation would have made Germany feel discriminated against because they were not the only country involved in the…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now the alliance system didn’t spark the war, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand did, but these alliances allowed for a world scale war to happen. Austria-Hungary would have never gone to war if they didn’t have Germany as an ally, because they would be decimated right away, but with the assistance of Germany and Italy they were comfortable with going to war. If the alliances weren’t in place, the most we could expect would be a small war between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, but due to the alliances being in place, it turned into a world…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were 2 different alliances, the “Triple Alliance” which contained Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The other alliances was the “Triple Entente” and they were the United Kingdom, France, Russia. They would depend on each other and it hurts them when someone doesn't cooperate within the alliance. Italy switched sides in 1915 and it hurt Russia making them weaker. These alliances complicated things in The Great War because there is not enough trust and someone can turn their back on you.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cause of wwI dbq

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the turn of the twentieth century, Europe seemed to enjoy a period of peace and progress. Yet below the surface, several forces were at work that would lead Europe into the “Great War.” On of these forces was nationalism, and it had an explosive effect in the Balkans. But, nationalism was only one of the many causes of WWI. Historians and eye witnesses have described the causes of WWI and have tried to assess the responsibility for it. All wars occur because of basic political issues, such as nationalism, imperialism, alliances, militarism, and economics. World War I was no exception to this rule. Each of these played a part in bringing about The Great War. Along with these causes, all wars also have a spark and World War I is no different.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War I, also known as “The War to End All Wars”, “The War of the Nations”, and “The great war”, is studied all around the world. Although WWI is taught world wide, historians still debate on the main cause of the war. Historians can agree that the main five causes of WWI were militarism, alliance systems, imperialism, nationalism, and assassination. These five beliefs and actions lead up to the disunion of the world . WWI was an avoidable war. The causes of the war were all connected. Without militarism there would be no imperialism. Without imperialism there would be no nationalism. Without nationalism there would be no alliances. Without alliances there would be no assassination. However, because of nationalism and the idea that one…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The alliance systems in the war consisted of the Triple Alliance: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy and the Triple Entente: France, Great Britain, and Russia. These alliance systems were a large reason for the outbreak of war because once one of their allies got involved they all felt the obligation to join the fight. The alliance of France and Britain was formed out of fear of the growing German army, which in turn felt threatened by the alliance. The growing alliances formed during the war caused countries to feel threatened and take more preventive measures. Alliances were the main reason the war got as large as it did.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War I Essay

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    World War I was an explosion, but the fuse had been burning for a long while. The major European nations (Great Britain, France, Germany, and Russia) believed that if the nations were balanced, then war could be prevented (www.sanjuan.edu).Germany and its leader, Otto von Bismarck, felt that being in the middle of two powerful nations (France and Russia) would not be wise, so he actively sought out to make an alliance with at least one of them. When that eventually failed, he formed an alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy; this became known as the Triple Alliance. In response, France, Russia, and Great Britain formed an alliance known as the Triple Entente. This caused both sides to distrust each other and prepare for conflict by adding ships guns and men to their ever-growing arsenal.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War 1 Cause Analysis

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some form of peace has existed in Europe due to the delicate power balance. However due to the rise of Militarism, and imperialism nationalism the balance, which existed in Europe was heavily distorted. Therefore, many countries were fearful for an attack. So most countries held secret meetings to discuss classified mutual defense alliances, to protect each other against threats. Because once a country was attacked or threatened, the allied countries would come to their aid. When after the the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, Austria Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia declared war on Austria Hungary to protect its ally. On the other side, Germany was an ally of Austria-Hungary and therefore declared war on Russia. Since France was again an ally of Russia, France declared war on Germany. When Germany crossed through neutral Belgium, to launch an attack against France, Britain joined the war since it had an agreement with Belgium. The collapse of the complicated structure of alliances caused more than 100 countries to participate in the war, even as far away as Japan, Bolivia, Canada and…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays