Preview

History Of The Bill Of Rights Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History Of The Bill Of Rights Essay
The Bill of Rights was something that the antifederalist wanted to be in the constitution. This was one of the compromises that the founders came up with so that they could ratify the constitution. The Anti-federalist wanted the Bill of Rights so that every person in the country knew what rights could not be taken way rom them, these rights were called inalienable rights. The Federalist finally gave in to producing such rights, and thus the Bill of Rights were formed. Finally with the Bill of Rights in place the constitution was ratified in 1791. The Anti-Federalist did not like how the constitution wasn’t dividing things equally among all three branches of the government. The Anti-federalists wanted the government divided into branches, but also did not want them to be to powerful where the people could not run them. They did this so no branch had more power than another. This was to solve the problem that was inevitable. The fight over who is the more important branch. The anti federalist put this into play due to the fact of arguing and uncertainty. They used this as a kind of safe guard for citizens’ rights. …show more content…
They thought that if they could pass anything why not one that could be harmful.
In conclusion, the Anti-federalist wanted government divided into branches, but they did not want any branch to have more power than any other. Having the power over the government allowed citizens to become more open and voice their own opinions. However they could not just make any law up, the laws had to be in the best interest of the country. The Bill of Rights made sure that the peoples best interest was displayed at the national level. The Bill of Rights was to show the people what their rights are and have the enumerated rights written

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 1787, early America, officials and delegates came together to form a constitution that would restore the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the attempt at creating a government for the newly independent America. But, it soon became clear that the document was not strong enough to govern America. Therefore, delegates who came to be known as Federalists and Anti-Federalists issued major arguments on the ratification of the U.S Constitution. Federalists were individuals who wished to unify the 13 states in negotiation, and anti-federalists were individuals who wanted a weaker central government. George Washington and the federalists argued that a stronger central government would accommodate everyone including farmers and merchants. Meanwhile, the leader of the anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, reasoned that the development of this constitution may threaten the rights of people in the states. While the federalists and anti-federalists were arguing over how much power the government should hold, they eventually made compromises and ratified the U.S. Constitution. With these compromises the delegated created a constitution that still governs us to this day.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Anti federalist was more convincing because, Anti-Federalists fight that the Constitution gave lot more ability to the federal government, although speaking too much control away from state and local governments. Many perceive that the federal government would be too long removed to represent the ordinary citizen. Anti-Federalists scared that the nation was too large for the national government to answer to the anxieties of people on a state and local basis. The Anti-Federalists were also feared that the real text of the Constitution did not consist of a bill of rights.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the members of the Constitutional Convention, after several months of vigorous debating, finally finished their work, many of the members still objected to this document. The Federalists were the group of people who desired to get the finished new constitution ratified and the Anti-Federalists were the group of people who disliked the new constitution and believed it shouldn't be ratified because it was missing several key parts. The Anti-Federalists formulated arguments based on the weaknesses they found in the new constitution and used them against the Federalists in order to gain support, while the Federalists convinced citizens of the righteousness of the new constitution in order to gain their support.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalist Party, led by Patrick Henry, objected to the constitution. They objected to it for a few basic reasons. Mostly the Anti-Federalists thought that the Constitution created too strong a central government. They felt that the Constitution did not create a Federal government, but a single national government. They were afraid that the power of the states would be lost and that the people would lose their individual rights because a few individuals would take over. They proposed a "Bill of Rights", to make sure the citizens were protected by the law. They believed that no Bill of Rights would be equal to no check on our government for the people.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalist was known as pro nationalist with a strong national government support, where the national and state would have a certain power, but neither would have a supreme authority over the other. They also support the constitution which they abide too with a personal liberty protection. The anti-federalist also called the State right s advocates agree with a strong State rights, pro limited national government by limiting the power of the National Government. These two school of thought had a tremendous influence on liberties.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Federalists; John Day, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and James Madison, were supporters of the constitution. They believed that our nation needed a strong federal government. The reasoning behind their belief was because they found it was necessary that a strong federal government be made for the entire country. As said in the Federalist Paper number it mentions the idea of checks and balances which would prevent one branch from growing too strong and it would limit the governments power.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Anti-Federalists believed that mankind always seeks freedom and a social contract between the person and the state or the government to protect safety and rights such as happiness, self-defense and unalienable. Anti-Federalists also believed states declaration of rights is not enough and that these rights are so essential to life such as life, liberty and property that we can’t even risk losing it. After all it was seen necessary to specifically have Bill of Rights as the Anti-Federalists wanted to keep our…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The federalist called for a strong central government, a federal bank and an army. They proposed a new constitution, while the Anti-federalist wanted to remain under the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-federalist planned for the almost unavoidable corruption of a powerful central government. They wanted true federalism, a much better plan for our country long term.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Federalist were opponents of the Constitution who saw it as a limitation to both state and human rights. “Anti-Federalists repeatedly predicted that the new government would fall under the sway of merchants, creditors, and others hostile to the interests of ordinary Americans” (Foner 272). But they lacked the leadership of the Constitution’s defender. Fearful that their influence would have diminished, there were some state politicians that were involved with the Anti-Federalists which were the “revolutionary heroes as Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and Patrick Henry” (Foner 272). Liberty was the Anti-Federalist’s watchword and they felt that it was being threatened by the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists pointed out that the Constitution…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalist Analysis

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While federalists preferred a stronger central government and the Anti’s were the exact opposite a compromise was to be made in order to satisfy the majority of the people. This comprise was the bill of rights, which gives the basic freedoms to the people and limits the power of the government (consent of the governed).…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the constitution formed, two groups emerged, one as being the Federalist and the other as the anti- Federalist, each having two completely different views on the constitution. The Federalist supported the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances would protect the Americans from tranny. Also felt that the power should be spread among 3 different branches, the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The anti- Federalist which opposed the Constitution, where against having a strong central government in fear of the government ignoring rights of majority, but the biggest problem was the constitution lacked any protection for individual rights.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays