Federalist

Good Essays
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist
When the constitution formed, two groups emerged, one as being the Federalist and the other as the anti- Federalist, each having two completely different views on the constitution. The Federalist supported the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances would protect the Americans from tranny. Also felt that the power should be spread among 3 different branches, the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The anti- Federalist which opposed the Constitution, where against having a strong central government in fear of the government ignoring rights of majority, but the biggest problem was the constitution lacked any protection for individual rights.
I agree with the federalist, which supported the Constitution. This is because with the government split up into 3 branches there is no chance for one leader to emerge and have all power. For an example if the Executive Branch decided to pass a law it would have to be approved by all 3 branches for the law to be official. Another reason why I agree with the federalist is because they believed the Articles of Confederation were weak and ineffective and that is true because The Articles of Confederation did not give congress the power to enforce laws, pay taxes, or unify the states. Also, the Articles did allow congress to ask for money but never demand it. Now, congress could only pass a law if 9 states approved it and still had no power to enforce those laws on independent states overall the Articles of Confederation failed to unite the country as one, which led to all of the states doing their own thing and not listening to the government.
Some may say that the Anti-Federalist are actually right and we should have kept the Articles of Confederation because the Articles of Confederation is what kept the 13 colonies together through the Revolutionary War and the early years of the country. Also because the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Different Views of the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist on Human Nature The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist had very conflicting views on several things; however, they did have some similar views on topics such as on human nature and how it affected government. Other common interest of the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist was the preservation of liberty and government. They both believed that there were things that men were destined to do that can not be prevented; because of…

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalists believed in a strong central government. They supported the Constitution, central banking and financial policies as a way to cure the economy. They wished to depend on the nation, rather than the state, to provide security and counsel. Most Federalists were artisans, merchants and large farm owners. Anti-Federalists wanted more power to the states; they felt that if the Constitution was ratified power would be taken away from the people. These individuals were small farm owners who…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ashley Chu FEDERALIST No. 10 Madison is discussing the problem of factions fighting and it is tearing a country apart. Faction is a number of citizens, who are for one thing, or against something. As Madison defined “they are adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” There are two ways to control them, which are remove the cause the control the effect. In the essay he talks about the detail of how to remove the cause, which are destroy…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy explores the views of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the Constitution, and they wanted the Constitution to become law or ratified. Moreover, the Federalists wanted and believed in a strong, central government. The Federalists consisted of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. On the other side, there were opponents of the Constitution (the Anti-Federalists). The…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    officials and laws. Overview of the Federalists The Federalists favored a strong central government, policies were favorable to trade, finance and business. The Federalists were also in favor of national bank and favored ratification of the Constitution. The first Federalist movement was distinguished by a belief that the national government under the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that a stronger federal government was needed. The Federalists were able to get the national government…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalist had good reasoning for what they believed in, but the one side that stuck out to me was the Federalist side. The Federalists believed that America was headed in the wrong direction with the Articles of Confederation. It was believed by the Federalists that we needed a stronger national government because that would help protect individual rights. They also believed that we were in need of a new constitution or we just needed to change the constitution a bit…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the idea of drafting the new constitution, the Anti Federalists. The other is the Federalist, who supported the idea. The Anti-federalists argued that the new constitution would post a threat to its people freedom and liberty. They said that the constitution would give the central government too much power, and at the end may ends up like their mother land, England. But, the Federalists have a totally different view on this matter. The federalists argued that…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    between two opposing political philosophies during the late 1700’s. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties aroused at the formation and ratification of the Constitution. Both sides pointed out many arguments in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The main conflict between the two parties revolved around the amount of power and control that the states and national government would obtain. As I am on the Federalist side, I support and agree to ratify the Constitution. For this will…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists v. Anti-Federalists Participants in the Debate The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti Federalists went together like fire and ice. They always seemed to crash heads when it came to who should take power. The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves Federalists. They wanted a strong centered government. Unlike the Anti federalists, they were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists, they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays