Preview

History of Parole and Indeterminate Sentencing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
513 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of Parole and Indeterminate Sentencing
History of parole and indeterminate sentencing

History of parole and indeterminate sentencing This paper discusses the history of parole and indeterminate sentencing, how do either have a place in the current correctional system? In addition, would we be better off to abolish them for good? Parole began with the passing of the legislation on June 25, 1910. In this time, there were only three prisons and there were a parole board at each of the three prisons that would grant parole. The members of the parole board consist of the warden of the prison, the physician of the prison, and the administrator of prisons at the department of justice, which is in Washington, D.C. In May 1930 the legislation imparted a single board of parole, and was also based in Washington, D.C., this board will also consist of three members, that would serve full-time they was appointed by the Attorney General. By August 1948, the postwar would increase the prison population, and the Attorney General added two more members to the board of parole. By September 1950, the President will increase the board to eight members, which will serve a six-year term, and was also placed in the department of justice for administrative purposes (Fulwood, 2003). Just like the prole board, the indeterminate sentence review board will hold a prison hearing to decide if an offender should be released from prison. This board has five members that is appointed by the Governor of the state, and will serve a five-year term. One of the five members will be appointed as the chair by the Governor. At the hearing the board will decide if the offender is ready to be released from prison, the board will look at the offenders past and present performance, and the possible danger to the public. The board will work directly with other agencies, like the Department of Corrections. The most important thing is the victims concerns of the offenders release. The board will also collect and



Cited: Board, I. S. (N/A, N/A N/A). Prison Hearing. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from Indeterminate Sentence Review Board: http://www.srb.wa.gov/hearings/prison_hearings.shtml Fulwood, I. (2003, May). History of the Federal Parole System. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from Department of Justice: http://www.justice.gov/uspc/history.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: Parole in the Federal Probation System. (2011, May). Retrieved January 2013, from United States Court: http://www.uscourts.gov/News/TheThirdBranch/11-05-01/Parole_in_the_Federal_Probation_System.aspx…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The corrections system in the United States is an ongoing struggle to house and rehabilitate individuals who violate the law. The resources put towards the United States correctional system is substantial but not sufficient. The United States continues to have a rising number of inmates incarcerated and in turn often times face overcrowding issues and shortage of funds to provide other rehabilitation focused classes and programs. The corrections system in the United States has proven to show trends throughout the years since the corrections system was established. In order for the corrections system to improve, it must be analyzed and changed…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parole Pros And Cons

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page

    There are many things that the parole board should consider when making the decision to release an inmate or not. One factored being the severity of the crime. If the crime was murder or cause major damage to a thing or person, the board should not let that person out on parole. If you…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authority of a parole board to grant discretionary release to a prisoner before the expiration date of the maximum term varies from state to state and is a creature of the state's sentencing structure. Such structures are broadly categorized as determinate and indeterminate. These categories must be characterized as broad…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand parole one needs to know what parole is and what it means. Parole is the status and early release of a convicted offender who has been conditionally releases from prison by a paroling authority before his or her sentence is expired. Parole and Probation have similar conditions. While an offender is on parole they have certain rules they need to follow. There is another form of parole which is Federal parole. Federal parole was determined by the Parole Board under the United Stated Parole Commission. Federal parole was changed after the Sentencing Reform Act. The Sentencing Reform Act was a part of the U.S. Federal statute that was intended to increase the consistency in the United States federal sentencing; this abolished federal parole all together. Parole was introduced by Brockway Zebulon in 1876 as a way to reduce jail overcrowding and as a way to rehabilitate offenders by encouraging them to win back their freedom with good behaviors. The role of parole was to reduce prison terms based on good behavior. Another role of probation was to supervise the convicted after being granted parole and grant freedom to those who had uncertain sentences. The reduction of jail terms after good and responsible behavior use to reduce indeterminate sentences. “There are 25 percent of inmates who are freed from prison are still paroled by the paroling authority, such as a parole board” (Schmalleger, F).…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the decrease of the budget, it has made the parole offices job harder, with fewer people working and less recourse at their disposal. With the increase of caseload, this has created a system where everything is taking to much time by looking at paroles case by case (tt). There needs to be a new system introduced that have a better effect on oversight, control and consistency (tt). There needs to be new policy introduced that bring better community structure that allows the individual to feel a part of society which would stop them to commit a crime. There is the ideology struggle we think incarceration is the best form of punishment this has to change. The parole system does not work most criminal are sent back to prison. There has been…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several offenders that will be released from the penal system early, and when they are they will be placed on parole to continue their sentence. Parole is the supervised early release of inmates from correctional confinement. (Schmalleger, 2011). Parole is granted by the parole board and this is done so that offenders can return to society and hopefully live productive lives. Inmates are granted parole based on judgment and assessment of the parole board. There are two types of parole, discretionary and mandatory.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many goals of parole to a parolee. First, parole is earned through good behavior and self-improvement. The only difference in parole and probation is that if you are on parole, you have been to prison. The main concept of parole is to return the offender gradually to productive lives. Parole serves as a reward for good behavior while in prison. This meaning that the inmate has had no fights or write ups or any sort. The inmate is contributing to a less violent behavior within walls of a prison by providing an incentive to behavior to behave well. Community based treatment for those offenders who no longer need to be isolated from the community. Parolees that are released are at a lower cost than being incarcerated (www.people.missouristate.edu). There are conditions of parole that must be followed. Each parolee is assigned a parole officer they must report to. They will have routine appointments, how often is determined by the officer that must be attended. There is no associating with anyone with a criminal record. A full time job must be kept unless approved by your officer. No alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs will be consumed. Follow all instruction that your officer instructs you to do. If community service has been ordered make sure that the hours are completed. If there is restitution get it paid or make payment plans. There are conditions that are made that can affect your parole. If the parolee fails to report to their officer, fails to participate in a stipulated treatment program, or abuses drugs or alcohol while under supervision. There are many more conditions that can affect a person possibly going back to prison. There is a law that was enacted in 1984 called the Truth-In Sentencing Law that will possibly reduce prison time. This law is to offer greater protection of the victims of the crime and their families. Therefore, the law states that the offender is to…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corrections Timeline

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay is going to show the development with four eras of the correctional system. The four eras that will be discussed with be: 1800, 1960, 1980 and 2000. For each era we will go over the description of the holding or monitoring of the offenders, the treatment and punishment of the offenders and the influences of the particular era on today’s correctional system. The conclusion will discuss the most beneficial era to the correctional system, as well as, recommendations for ways in which the current correctional system could be improved upon.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As violent crime continued to rise, the public demanded harsher and more definite sentences. The rehabilitative concept was called into question as to its effectiveness, leading to the birth of the determinate sentencing structure. The determinate sentencing structure is that which gives an offender a fixed term of incarceration. This type of structured sentencing reform can be used to deter potential offenders and incapacitate dangerous offenders. For example, bringing drug paraphernalia into a prison requires a fixed prison sentence of two years. Judges, in such a case, do not have discretion when the statute “determines” what the sentence is to…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the 1930's the Penitentiary Act was drafted, which recommended that young males be in a separate penitentiary and that education to be a penitentiary officer was normal. In 1959 the National Parole Board was founded. This organization was designed to support and supervise parolees re-entering…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clear, Cole, and Reising ( American Corrections, p. 381-382) point out that when incarcerated in the United States, prisoners are released in three different methods. One method used is discretionary release, each state has a parole board which evaluates an inmate when eligible for parole. The amount of elements that are reviewed include the nature of the crime, the inmates behavior while incarcerated, and participation in rehabilitative programs that are made available. When the parole board…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    History of Corrections

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In 1790 came the birth of the Penitentiary in Philadelphia. The penitentiary was different than other systems in that it isolated prisoners, “ …isolated from the bad influences of society and one from another so that, while engaged in productive labor, they could reflect on their past miss-deeds…and be reformed,” (Clear, Cole, Reisig). The American penitentiary and its new concept was observed and adopted by other foreign countries.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays