Preview

History of Human Rights Laws in the United States of America

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1048 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of Human Rights Laws in the United States of America
In 1944, the US Supreme Court decided on the legality of the internment of Japanese-Americans by the United States government during World War II. The court unanimously decided that it is illegal for the government to intern a citizen who is found to be loyal to the United States (Bannai, 153). This was one of the first Supreme Court rulings in which the United States ruled to respect the rights of an un-trusted minority, and therefore the Endo decision was a turning point for human rights in America. Many of the violations to human rights in the United States that predate Ex Parte Endo would have been deemed illegal if they were to occur nowadays, in part due to the Endo decision. One of these violations to human rights was the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This Act called for the relocation of the Cherokee to Oklahoma, commonly referred to as “The Trail of Tears.” This violated human rights by forcing the Cherokee, who were well assimilated with the white American culture, to leave their homes and walk on foot to a new settlement out west. More than 4,000 of those who were forced to relocate died due to harsh conditions, disease, and exhaustion (Hansen, 1). The main reason for their removal was that white settlers wanted the gold that had recently been discovered on the Cherokee’s land; it was not due to any crime on the part of the Cherokee. If the same event were to happen today, it would be found illegal due the decision made in Endo because it can be said that the Cherokee’s relocation was a form of internment. There was no reason to suspect that any of them were not loyal to the United States. However, this would only be true if they were American citizens (Karst, 1416). Though, one could argue that by taking the Cherokee’s land and forcing them to live in Oklahoma, which is part of the United States, the government in a way forced the Cherokee Indians to become citizens. The decision made in Ex Parte Endo would make forced relocation of this kind both a


Cited: Bannai, Lorraine K. “Ex Parte Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944).” Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States. Ed. David S. Tanenhaus. Vol. 2. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. 152-155. U.S. History In Context. Web. 2 Apr. 2013. Hansen, Megan. “Following the footsteps of our Cherokee ancestors.” Faces: People, Places, and Cultures Sept. 2010: 38+. General OneFile. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. KARST, KENNETH L. “Japanese American Cases Hirabayashi v. United States 320 U.S. 81 (1943) Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214 (1944) Ex Parte Endo 323 U.S. 283 (1944).” Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. Ed. Leonard W. Levy and Kenneth L. Karst. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2000. 1415-1417. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 3 Apr. 2013. Sick, See G. “Iran hostage crisis.” Infoplease. Pearson Education, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. . Wood, Jennie. “How We’ve Changed Since 9/11.” Infoplease. Pearson Education, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    I chose the landmark case of Korematsu v. United States for this research paper. Back on December 7, 1941 the Japanese attacked US Naval forces in Pearl Harbor located in Hawaii. The next day the US declared war on Japan and everyone was in a panic wondering what would happen next. The United States joined World War II and all Japanese and Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and put into camps, because the US government was afraid that there could spies or that the people with a Japanese heritage could turn against America. Executive Order 9066 was put into place by President Roosevelt and this order made it possible to put anyone from full Japanese to even 1/16th into special facilities where they were seclude from the general population. Was the Executive Order unconstitutional or not? Fred Korematsu was a native born citizen of the US, but was of Japanese heritage and he was convicted on September 8, 1942 of being in a place where Japanese weren’t allowed. Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court and in a 6-3 vote they sided with the government, because they said that the potential spying and espionage was more important than Korematsu’s Constitutional rights. From my research I have concluded that even though Korematsu got his case overturned in 1984 because of untruthful information it was still unfair that it is still deemed Constitutional that there were internment camps for Japanese-Americans. Amendments 1, 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, and 15 of the United States Constitution were all violated and I will explain why in this paper.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu vs U.S

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kezia Howard 1 Kezia Howard Professor Myhre Law and Society 05 September 2010 I. KOREMATSU vs. UNITED STATES Korematsu vs. United States is a landmark Supreme Court case that involves the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, known for interning Japanese Americans during World War II. Fred Korematsu was a U.S.-born Japanese American, who showed no signs of disloyalty, but stayed in San Leandro, California, deliberately violating Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34, which excluded all persons of Japanese ancestry from that area. Decided in Post Pearl Harbor hysteria, President Roosevelt granted these laws, in order to “protect” the Japanese Americans from hateful crimes and to prevent espionage during this wartime. This case, decided with a majority vote 6-3, ruled that the exclusion orders were constitutional. Korematsu vs. United States has been incredibly controversial due to the court’s decision that the need for national defense outweighed Korematsu’s individual rights guaranteed to him in the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process clause. Despite the military’s right to war powers, General DeWitt had no evidence of disloyalty among the Japanese Americans. This fundamental flaw in authority should have led the court to rule in favor of Korematsu against the internment camps, which was essentially a euphemism for concentration camps. By analyzing the different arguments in the case, majority, concurring, and dissenting, the reader can determine that the dissenting opinion held the most persuasive amount of evidence. II. MAJORITY OPINION Justice Black, Reed, Douglas, and Rutledge made up the majority opinion, focusing on the idea that this case, based on administrative orders by the military, has no regard to race.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shepardizing Pa201

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: United States of America v. James L. Crowder, 543 F.2d 312 (D.C. Cir. 1976)…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result, Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps, regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American citizen, refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore, he was convicted of disobeying the law. This landmark court case was deemed unconstitutional due to the violation of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Polygraph Usage

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Frye v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 46, 293 F. 1013. No. 3968, (1923)…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Foreign Policy and the Iran Hostage Crisis, edited by David Patrick Houghton, Cambridge University Press, 2001. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/lib/apus/detail.action?docID=201802.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Villemez, Jason, and Dalia Mortada. "9/11 to Now: Ways We Have Changed." PBS. PBS, 14 Sept. 2011. Web. 21 Oct.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War Two, Japanese-American citizens were placed into internment camps in the United States due…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Never is this more eloquently illustrated than during the Japanese internment. Hirabayashi, a conscientious objector to the internment procedures utilized by the government, breaks the curfew set by Public Proclamation #1 and turns himself into the authorities and is arrested and conviction was upheld in the courts on the basis that Japanese Americans are not truly Americans because they are unassimilable and set themselves apart from mainstream society. The case of Korematsu, a man who deliberately evaded evacuation orders, despite being rejected from a previous attempt to enlist, went to the Supreme Court. The main point of contention was whether or not the evacuation was Constitutional; it was found to be legal due to military necessity and Korematsu was convicted. In the case involving Endo, who broke no laws and did not initiate her case, she was illegally detained because she was not a military threat. The day before the judgment, the evacuation was rescinded. The case of Endo passed unanimously (Shah). Asian Americans not only respected the legal…

    • 2386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Iranian hostage crisis will be described as a decision-making situation that occurred at the national level. It will be compared with the Cuban missile crisis in context of the special evaluation framework. The decision-making of this case ended with the aborting of the rescue mission on April 25, 1980.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Airport Security

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    VILLEMEZ, JASON. "9/11 to Now: Ways We Have Changed." PBS. September 14, 11. Accessed May 15, 2016.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. legal system is considered a developed one that consists of many levels of statutes, amendments, and precedence. Simple reference to the Constitution cannot provide complete justification for the existence of a rule. Instead, one must take into account the rule’s relation to the Constitution, previous interpretations of related rules, and the possible conflict this rule may have with the previous rules. Observation of these relations is…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays