Preview

History of Bolsheviks

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1884 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of Bolsheviks
1a)
i) True ii) Neither side won the war
Iii) True
IV) True
V) True
VI) True
Vii) False
Vii) True
Que 1b.
Provisional Government was set up (February 1917)
Abdication of Tsar Nicholas II (2nd March 1917)
Food riots in Petrograd (8th March 1917)
Formation of Petrograd Soviet of Workers and Soldiers Deputies (March 1917)
Lenin releases his ‘April Theses’ (4th April 1917)
‘July days’ (3rd to 7th July according to Julian calendar and 16th to 20th July according to Gregorian calendar)
The ‘Kornilov affair’ (August 1917)
Russia becomes a republic (November 7 1917)
Que 2.
Antagonism was limited to mount as the truth of Bolshevik law became distinct. The entire civil facility went on strike, taking the administration and supply of food almost to a stop. The church was also an opponent, the Cossacks and the ordinary individuals resisted, specifically the peasants because they came to know what was going on. Treaty of Brest-Litosk disgusted Russian view of every tint, including quite genuine innovative. Bolsheviks were coercing their rivals to bring them together. Even if they were assaulted from north, south and east, west, with connected intervention happening on a large scale, with drought and critical discontent awakening from their financial policies, Bolsheviks endured. This is because their triumph was absolutely the split between the forces that were not Bolshevik and their absence of cooperation with the allied forces.
Another cause was their defeat to recruit peasant reinforcement. Counter-innovativeness is regularly blind to the experiences of transformation. They had seen what the Bolsheviks really were, the more successful peasants would have reinforced their opposes. The intolerant elements in the white forces soon showed that their major aim was to accomplish back the farms the labourers had stolen, and re-start the feudal structure. Either side did not please the peasants or they isolated themselves.
Another reason is that a resourceful

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1855, opposition to the Tsarist Government lacked an effective unifying ideology. This remained the case throughout the 1855-1964 period, even once the communists had taken power. A key contributing factor towards this was the lack of unity opposition possessed. Opposition throughout the period came from several sources, however it was dominated by division in opinion and ideology, only fully uniting in the February revolution of 1917 which brought down Nicholas II and the Romanov dynasty. Even then opposition still differed in opinion, however it was unified by one common cause. Throughout the period, the peasantry were providing opposition to Russian Government. However opposition was repeatedly ineffective. The Polish revolt of 1863 during Alexander II's reign was crushed by the army in much the same way as the 1953 East German revolt and the 1956 Hungarian rebellion were crushed under Khrushchev's tenure. A continuing feature throughout the period is the key role which the army played in limiting opposition from the peasantry, with military force frequently being deployed throughout the period. Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies of the peasantry and Stalin used a similar style of brute force in the assault on the peasantry during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. The army was very important to the state and their loyalty to Nicholas II during the 1905 revolution was vital in ensuring he was not deposed then instead of twelve years later. The peasantry also lacked a shared ideology and there were several other factors which meant that a full scale peasant revolt was never likely to occur. The demographic and general backwardness of Russia, whose weakness was repeatedly shown by failures in war throughout the period, meant that the peasantry were never going to unify because poor communications and transport links simply…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political differences were put aside as Russians joined to fight the common enemy defending their homeland. Even urban discontent, which had been expressed in an increasing number of political and economic strikes in the first half of the year,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unknown.(2001). Petrograd during World War I and the revolution (1914-1924).[Internet].Available from: http://www.saint-petersburg.com/history/1914-1924.asp (Accessed 1 April, 2012)…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the same trenches were not found in the East due to the extensive border. Alternatively, decisive battles were fought to capture and re-capture key cities, such as Novo-Georgiesk and Brest-Litovsk. Additionally, the German high command set to aid internal discontent within Russia. The discontent came in the form of assisting the pro-Tsarist White Russians in over throwing the government, and the ultimate rise of the Bolsheviks. The instability of the Russian government weakened the strength of the military, and drained the moral as soldiers were brought back in to deal with civil…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another few reasons which I believe were important in the Bolsheviks winning the war, other than controlling more people and having access to more weapons, would be the disunity of the opposition. Most opposition parties all had different aims, the Whites were tsarist supporters, the Greens wanted control for the peasants, and also the Ukraine’s fought both the white and the red. With all the opposition parties wanting different aims, it made it hard for them to come to agreements to try and overthrow the Bolsheviks, and sometimes they would seem like they were fighting other opposition parties more than they were the Bolsheviks, leaving the Bolsheviks to carry on without much interference.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolsheviks acted in a brutal manner during the year 1917-1924; however this was not the main reason why they remained in power during that time frame. Instead their survival can mostly be attributed to the weakness of their opposition, who displayed a lack of organisation and unification. There were other reasons for the Bolsheviks' remaining in power between 1917 and 1924, such as the efficiency and strong leadership of the Bolsheviks, and their geographical advantages; but these were ultimately not as significant as the the weakness of their opposition, as their survival was dictated by how they exploited their enemies' flaws.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian Communist Party first emerged under the Bolsheviks in 1905 when general strikes were organised in St. Petersburg and Moscow. At this time the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were a minority group and increasingly divided from the Mensheviks over pace of reform and ideology. It was due to the Tsar’s ignorance throughout World War One that the Bolshevik saw an inadvertent increase in influence of opposing groups. Although, the Bolsheviks were not in power by 1917 their membership was increasing and it was Lenin’s simple slogans, such as ‘Peace, Bread, Land’ that attracted the Russian population, increasing Bolshevik influence. The fact that the Bolsheviks were the only party to promise an end to the war won the ‘hearts and minds’ of the Russian people, which could be argued that Lenin was the most significant individual in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party. However, it was both the leadership from Lenin and military organisation from Trotsky that meant the October revolution of 1917 was, to a certain extent, a success. Darby argues that ‘Without [Lenin] it is unlikely that the Bolsheviks would have taken power in October’ whilst Figes claims ‘Trotsky became its principal source of public inspiration’. Post the October revolution, the Bolsheviks were a majority in the second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, proving that they had managed to exert a large amount of influence on the Russian population. After this it is more difficult to assess whether it was certain individuals that played a part in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party as in the summer of 1918 Lenin set up a one-party state and ended the Constituent Assembly. The introduction of the NEP, in 1921, increased party influence as the peasants were allowed a little capitalism back, ending grain requisitioning and armed resistance in the countryside. It is hard to evaluate…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A revolution earlier on in 1917 would have been near impossible; the Bolsheviks lacked support. The party was in the minority within the Petrograd Soviet, leaving them at a political disadvantage instantly. In addition to this, the Bolsheviks gathered only 25% of the votes during the elections in March. As a result, the Bolsheviks could not even think about attempting to takeover; they lacked political support and influence.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bolsheviks Primary Source

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Source A is supposed to be a valuable one because it’s adapted from Lenin’s April Theses for Peace, thus offering a perspective on the Revolution from the Bolshevik Party leader himself. However, the fact that it’s ‘adapted’ lowers its credibility, as the document might have suffered misleading changes, meant to portray Lenin and the Bolsheviks in a certain way. Moreover, the extract is published by the official communist newspaper which indicates a clear bias in favour of the Bolshevik Revolutionaries, making it a secondary source.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This ideological backing would drive and justify the brutality of the Party itself along with its claim to power after the October Revolution of 1917. The need to maintain the idea of Democratic Centralism would lead to the introduction of the Cheka and the inception of War Communism during the Civil War.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    failure of previous government to resist, existence of the MRC (the new political band they created), weaknesses of the non Bolsheviks,…

    • 6664 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Bolsheviks were able to consolidate their power in Russia in the years after the Revolution because they were better organised and better led than their opponents. In addition, they had a compelling ideology, and offered more to Russia’s peasants and workers than their opponents could at the time. More than anything, though, they were completely ruthless, willing to do whatever was necessary in order to win.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin wanted to completely transform Russia from a tsarist autocracy to a communist. This made people imagine how equal and better life will be after the repeal of the Tsar. On the Eastern Front, the Russian army was struggling to hold on against the German military because of the shortages. Russia was struggling to produce enough weapons or food to support the war effort.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Change in Russia

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The conditions in Russia after the upset were no superior to conditions some time recently. Deficiencies of nourishment and produced merchandise really expanded as generation diminished. Laborer ranchers were compelled to offer their yields to the legislature under Lenin's "war socialism" arrangement abandoning them with scarcely enough to survive. Workers soon lost motivation to develop more products or stored what they did develop. Workers who did this and were figured out were ousted, detained or executed. Mechanical yield really fell underneath the levels they had been at under the Tsar. Lenin distinguished this and expecting that the Russian individuals might rebel against him and the Bolsheviks, organized the New Economic Policy. It finished almost no assistance. Anybody voicing resistance or feedback of the way the Bolsheviks were running things was marked a counterrevolutionary and likewise banished, imprisoned or executed. All things considered, the predicament of the workers and workers deteriorated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolsheviks appealed to the people of Russia in 1917 mainly because Russian society craved change. The tsar was now a part of the past and Russian society wanted to try something new. This is mainly why the Bolshevik party appealed to the people of Russia in 1917.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays