Preview

History Book Bias: How History Books Tell The Truth

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History Book Bias: How History Books Tell The Truth
History: History Book Bias

University Writing Instructor: Richard Baker Brandon University Hongbo Sun 101289 July 24, 2011

Abstract This research paper discusses the history books tell the truth, meaning the actual what, when, where, why, how, and who of a past event is biased. People always put their own biases in every aspect of collecting data and presenting it. History books are unable to tell the truth because they are usually connected with a philosophical explanation of why an event happened. This paper run though the various factors involved in the writing of a history book and tell the history book can not tell truth.

Introduction
…show more content…
A person has also the right to be wrong. But a textbook has no right to be wrong; or to evade the truth, falsity history, or insult and malign a whole race of people. That is what the textbook do” (Henry, 1970) It is different to write a general book and a history book. A general book can be fiction, but a history book must tell the truth. The question is, can history book really tell the truth? The answer is no. It is no such thing as an unbiased book. Every communication expresses the views of individuals making them. In the case of books, those views are fixed in aspic for all who dip at any time in the future into that particular confection. (Klein, 2002) Every one has a unique viewpoint which he subconsciously brings to bear on all incoming sensory material; totally objectivity is just not possible for anyone. History book are inherently biased because of the personal influence and interpretation of historians. Historians put their own biases in every aspect of collecting data and presenting it. All of the material would be part fact, part inference, part judgment, and part

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Among the reading assignments, the chapter “Who Owns the Past?” in Dangerous Game by MacMillan piqued my interest to elaborate on. In this chapter, she emphasizes that history is written by many historians who have their own views, interpretations, and biases. In this regard, she implies that we should not simply believe in what historians claim, but dig into its sources and figure out from many perspectives. There are many ‘bad’ history produced by historians without offering a wide range of views and this can be used as an instrument that can largely influence on people by giving them prejudice on certain events. There are always reasons behind each event and it is important to find out what indeed happened as well as where the history is…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teaching History and the Consequences of it? According to, the chapter eleven from the book “ Lies my teacher told me” by James w. Loewen, under the title “Why is history taught like this? To answer for this question’s, it is better to see different directions as well as the perception of the of the teacher’s, the final goal of the responsible college or university or the giver institution, or the strategy of the education policy curriculums, why prefers or allowed to give this one sides negative image of history for college level students? The answer would be depends on the above hypothesis.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Growing up I always dreaded history, I never understood why we had to learn about the past. It wasn’t until a couple years ago that I realize that history is what shaped the world into what it is today and where I stand in this world. As a Mexican living in the United States history has really helped me understand why my family and I don’t have the same opportunity as white people. When I read the first 4 chapters to Lies My Teacher Told Me by James Loewen right away I was able to relate to what he was saying. Being a person of color learning history growing up I noticed that the history books only showed one point of view. A lot of the truth was covered up and that’s why now when I read something historical it’s very important for me to read…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccuracies continue to plague populist histories, and as such those within the academic field continue to rebut their rivals with these flaws. They argue that these, as Margaret Conrad states, “producers” of “historical films” intentionally integrate inaccuracies in order to entertain their audience, rather than inform. Contrasting this view, modern historian Michelle Arrows argues that “academic historians ignore TV and their [our] own peril”. This viewpoint conveys the necessity of establishing a balance between academic historians and popular historians to, as Margaret Conrad believes, “generate a dialogue with the public”. Academic historians argue they present history “as it actually was” (enlightened historian Von Ranke). This is substantiated with their argument that they exclusively present history with full accuracy. It is this disagreement that enforces the considerable tension between academic and popular historians.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    history 'biased'

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) The word ‘biased’ means being for something. For example if there was a protest about who should be the next Prime minister you would be biased if you wanted one of the nominees to win more than the others.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The struggle to find truth in telling the stories of history has been a source of constant debate amongst historians and intellectuals. With the emergence of religious rejection during the seventeenth and eighteenth century Enlightenment, the influence and undoubted supremacy of the heroic model of science provided historians with new ways for obtaining truth—absolute truths—through the dispassionate eyes of a “heroic” observer. Although this remains unchallenged for many generations, with the cultural changes and the democratization of education, the idea of an absolute truth—a universal story of national progress which neglects to encompass the diversity of America—is challenged by post-modernity. In all its pessimisms towards absolute truths and objective knowledge, post-modernism illustrates the importance of and sets the foundation for questioning historical accuracy and the idea of objectivity. Can there be truth when the words and language of the “objective” observer is unintentionally dripping in their own personal, social, and political agendas? Through the works of Foucault and Deerdas, who get at the heart of this very question, historians are encouraged to reject the Enlightenment project, and look deeper into historical evidence to interrogate the structure and organization of the text, its vocabulary, and hidden assumptions. Although, post-modernity—a critique of the Enlightenment ideals—creates the framework for the questioning of historical accuracy, it is very important to recognize its inability to formulate its own solutions to this historical dilemma. Fortunately, with the succeeding ideas of practical realists, there is a sense of hope and optimism for the future of history and the all-encompassing truths that it can uphold.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly I would like to explain why I chose somehow different topic of my presentation. Because today, I won’t present to you any book or film but some social phenomenon. When I was trying to make decision, which book should I chose, I realized that all my favorite books are historical themes, and for those of you who are not interested in history there are just boring. Suddenly, few days ago I accidentally read article on the internet about interesting issue, of whose existence I didn’t know.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historical Bias

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are two sides to every story. Parents, students with siblings, or even school faculty can attest to the statement that when someone is to blame in a situation, there can be two or more very different stories as to how the problem arose. Usually it is a matter of “he said she said” and depending on the situation, you pick the story that either sounds most accurate to you or that you want to believe. You may think that this is something that just happens at this day in age, but this occurs everywhere and has occurred over time. This is called historical bias. This paper will investigate ways to avoid historical bias, how historical bias may affect how we think about our past, and other examples of historical bias.…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History is the past written by the present. The very nature of this statement creates the predicament of historical knowledge. The historians of the present are under constant pressure of rapidly changing society; therefore what we discover from the past is dependent on our perceptions that are forever changing. History and historical explanations are deduced and manipulated by the two ways of knowing, language and reasoning. The role of language in history is very important, because history is written, presented and illustrated to people through language. Reasoning is also an important factor in history; through reasoning historian create a historical record and decipher as logically possible a conclusion. In this essay, the roles and the importance of language and reasoning in history will be explored and to what extent they both help and hinder the pursuit of historical knowledge.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History has always been a subject that is looked upon by many as a very controversial and biased one. In History people can have disagreements. One historian can believe that an event in the past happened in a certain way while another can think it happened differently. This is because history is a matter of interpretation as well as evidence, of judgement as well as knowledge. As a result of this historians must combine the rigor of a scientist with the imagination of an artist, to have the ability to produce a reasonable conclusion. Another historian however can challenge this conclusion. It is impossible to create a conclusion that every historian will agree with.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One difference in learning history through literature and learning history through informational text is how both of the stories have a different purpose. In…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, I will examine the problem of biased knowledge in a historical aspect. It is probably fair to say that nearly every historical event and its interpretation have been shaped by the bias and selectiveness of different people. This depends upon different factors such as Religion, Ethics and Culture, but we are also biased because of emotional, social and political involvement in any event. We don't only face this problem when gaining knowledge about historical events in the past but we also shape "our history", because we too, as a recorder of current events are…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth035V 03 04 Assignment

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • Often textbooks are biased in that they favour a particular point of view or perspective.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kaspil2 Petition

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a student from De La Salle University and a concerned citizen of the Philippines, I would like to raise up some issues that I have noticed in some history textbooks being produced and used in primary and secondary schools. When I was in Elementary and High School, I was made to believe in inaccurate things about the American and Japanese occupation of our country. These things were straightened out by my professor in De La Salle University and I believe that the children who still use these textbooks have the right to be taught what is correct.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays