top-rated free essay

History

By ebamarshall00 Jul 04, 2014 778 Words
. a. After examining one of the maps of Europe, explain whether Germany or Great Britain had the greater need for a strong navy. After examining one of the maps, I thought that Great Britain had the greater need for a stronger navy. b. Explain why you chose this country.

I chose Great Britain because it was surrounded by water so they would need to strengthen their navy to block the other countries from invading overseas. Germany would not need to invest in their navy as much because the country is surrounded by land so they would need to block out the countries from invading on land rather then water. c. Based on the state of the arms race in 1914, if you were a German citizen, how would you feel? Explain why. If I were a German citizen I would feel scared that Great Britain has the world’s naval power and is not apart of our alliance but also proud that Germany was able to get to second after building their first two battleships the Nassau and the Westfalen. But Germany as a whole should still feel scared because they are surrounded by land from countries that are not in the same alliance. d. Based on the state of the arms race in 1914, if you were a British citizen, how would you feel? Explain why. If I were a British citizen I would feel very powerful because we have the most naval size and strength over all the other countries. Also because we have Russia and France to back us up even though their armies are smaller.

2. How did the naval arms race encourage the development of the alliance system the way it did? Be sure to refer to Great Britain, France, Germany, and Russia, as well as each of the alliance groups specifically. Britain had a very strong navy with having control over the oceans but also having France and Russia as their allies. This probably encouraged Germany to get more strength in their navy because of the competitiveness between Germany and Great Britain. As a result Germany and Austria-Hungary formed their own alliance along with Italy making the Triple Entente.

3. a. How was Canada connected to the European system of Empires? Canada was connected to the European system of Empires because Canada was a colony of Britain at the time. b. How did Canada’s connection to the European empires affect its relationship to the major European alliances that existed at the start of World War One? Since Canada was a colony of Britain at the time, it affected their relationship to the major European alliances that existed at the start of World War One so when Great Britain went to war, Canada went with them. c. How does this compare to the United States? The United States had broken away from England in the War of Independence, severing its ties with the European Empire. d. How did the European system of empires and alliances affect Canada’s ability to decide what its involvement in World War One would be?

4. a. Define “nationalism”.
Nationalism is patriotic feelings, principles and/or efforts that you have for your country/nation. In this case, which is more extreme, nationalism is considered feeling superior over other countries. It also could mean the country has support of political independence for a particular country. b. Use this definition of nationalism to explain specifically how nationalism helped make each of the causes of World War One even stronger. Each of the causes of World War one was made stronger by nationalism. Militarism was made stronger from nationalism because one country could feel more superior or confident over another because of how protected they are with their navy/army. Alliances were made stronger from nationalism because the more countries who have joined together to become an alliance and act as one could feel more confident and superior compared to smaller countries who haven’t joined an alliance. Imperialism was made stronger from nationalism because the pride and superior feeling of a country made them want to take over more land and cover a larger area to make them even more ahead of other countries.

5. Identify two things that could have prevented a world war, based on what happened after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. One thing that could have prevented a world war is The Serbian Austria-Hungary not blaming Serbia for the assassination would be a big help too. It was a member of the Serbian terrorist group, The Black Hand, but could have been dealt with in another way instead of declaring war on the country and having to get alliances involved.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • How Historians Study History

    ...Your Full Name Instructor's Name Class Name Date How Do Historians Study History? People might tend to think of a historian, particularly an instructor, as someone who has a fairly straightforward and simple profession. After all, history is already written. Thus, it should simply be a matter of just memorizing a series of facts. Of cou...

    Read More
  • The Importance of History

    ...Importance of History It is both necessary and helpful to study the context of prior history because it is relevant to who we are. Studying events in history provide a clear picture of past participants experiences and behaviors, so that we take what others have done and build upon it. Past cultures took time and efforts to document histori...

    Read More
  • History and Memory

    ...MODULE C – History and Memory The Fiftieth Gate by Mark Baker suggests that a combination of history and memory is essential in making meaning, i.e. in shaping perceptions of the world around us. How does baker represent this combination to create meaning? History can be viewed as a sequential series of indisputable events, whereas memory ...

    Read More
  • History Bias

    ...History: History Book Bias University Writing Instructor: Richard Baker Brandon University Hongbo Sun 101289 July 24, 2011 Abstract This resear...

    Read More
  • Studying History

    ...Why Do We Study History? The reasons for studying history vary from personal ones, to some that affect an entire society or group of people. As conscious beings, there always has been a need to study and learn why and how the world has evolved to its current point today. As an individual, one often hears, “learn from your mistakes.” The pa...

    Read More
  • Social History

    ...and analyze different events in the history of the revolutions, but they may also contradict or conflict with previously established knowledge causing historians to reconsider facts that were once considered accepted. In conclusion, what social historians give to our understanding of the revolutions of 1917 is an insight into how ordinary men a...

    Read More
  • Micro History

    ...It is the most interesting and innovative approach to history. The pathfinder of the field was the German Historian George G Igger. He developed it as a methodology in 1970’s to counter the traditional methodology of Social sciences. The basic objection of him was that through the traditional methodology it is not possible to know the c...

    Read More
  • History and Perspective

    ...The study of history is a crucial component within our society, it allows us to educate ourselves so we are aware of what changes the world has gone through and what people have faced within the past. Not only this, but studying history will hopefully allow us to come closer to why certain events occurred and via the analysis of multiple perspec...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.