Preview

Han's Crimes Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
894 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Han's Crimes Essay
Without A Doubt Although the jury finds Han not guilty of pre-meditated murder, the details of the story show his crime to be in fact pre-meditated murder. All evidence shows that, he has a deceptive and manipulative character. He has the opportunity to commit murder without blame, and because he has a reason. Upon hearing the interview of character witnesses and analyzing Hans 's thoughts and feelings during the course of the murder, the reader finds sufficient evidence of the several reasons Han intentionally killed his wife during the course of the act. There are three major reasons as to why Han is guilty. The first being a mistake like this cannot happen to an experienced performer, secondly Han 's manipulative character, and lastly Han 's motives for killing his wife. When interviewing the Director of the Theatre, we find out a few things, which help us understand why he murdered his wife. When the judge questioned the director if the act was difficult the exact answer was "No, Your Honor it 's not as difficult as that for an experienced performer" (250). Han has performed this act many times, which makes him an experienced performer, knowing this we can say that from the director 's statement Han knew what he was doing when the act was in play. When the judge asked the director for his opinion on whether or not he believes that this was all an accident or was a done with an intention to kill the directors response was "That I simply cannot say, your Honor" (250). From this quote, we can see much hesitation from the witness who clearly knew Han from working with him; this shows that Han 's own friend cannot defend him simply because he knows Han is guilty of pre-meditated murder. Han 's actions directly after the murder play a part in unraveling his manipulative character. When the judge was in the process of questioning Han, Han revealed a key component to the case, which shows what kind of man he was. When the judge 's statement arose


Cited: Shiga, Naoya. "Han 's Crime." Trans. Ivan Morris. World Views: Classic and Contemporary Readings. 6th edition Ed. Darron Felty, Ed Macy, Ann Mcdonalad, Jack Trotten, Roger Westand, Susan Williams, New York: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 249-257. Print.hhhHHHSDHIADS

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This, I believe...

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His decision shows that he valued his ego over his conscience. However, his honesty and reflection of the incidence proves that he is conscious of his actions and he felt remorse.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Judge Dee begins solving the crimes, the story unfolds slowly and shows the reader the history of China. In the Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee, Judge Dee lived in the Tang dynasty. During this period, one can see how the Chinese authoritative views were strict, the laws and punishment which were enforced, and what the outlook on the Chinese society was. Authority had a strong hold on their community and the people in the town also confined in them to help them and solve crimes. The community also knew what the consequences of causing a crime was and that indeed it was wrong to omit a crime. Judge Dee and with the help of his associates, begins solving the crime through much observation and Judge Dee was very clever. He used methods and tools such as, going undercover, using underground sources, interrogation, and forensic science to solve his problems. It isn’t much different today on how we solve crime in the western world.…

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The defendant killed with malice and aforethought (either deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life).…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -He was accused of poisoning and dismembering his wife. He was accused of this crime because he was her husband.…

    • 339 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oj Simpson Research Paper

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Orenthal James Simpson, commonly known as O.J. Simpson, was tried for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown-Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman who were stabbed on the evening of June 12, 1994. He was acquitted of the murder charge in 1995, but I am going to explain why he explain should have been found guilty of the murder.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined from the Merriam-Webster dictionary online, involuntary manslaughter is, “the unlawful killing of a human being without express or implied malice.” According to this definition, what Billy did was not murder, a capital crime, and therefore they should not have ruled him guilty. This was Billy’s first offense to anyone. Charming, young and sweet, Billy never made any evil action or verbal attack…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judge Taylor was polling the jury: 'Guilty...guilty...guilty...guilty...' I peeked at Jem: his hands were white from gripping the balcony rail, and his shoulders jerked as if each "guilty" was a separate stab between them... (end of Chapter 21)…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play from the starting juror 8 is the only one who votes ‘not guilty’ as he says, ‘It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.’ This clearly tells us that he had gone through all the evidences and found them to be lacking whereas all the other eleven jurors had assumed that this was an ‘open and shut case’ without thinking of any other chances. This is obvious when he says towards the end of the play, ‘….we have a reasonable doubt, and this is a safeguard which has enormous value in our system. No jury can declare a man guilty unless it’s sure.’ These words of juror 8 have a tremendous influence on the other jurors to vote unanimously ‘not guilty’ in favour of the boy.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han Dynasty Causes

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Han Empire was one of the strongest classical empires. It prevailed long before many others have fallen. The Han has achieved many things but for many reasons did not last. “all great things must come to an end”, and for the Han being such a great empire its reasons were lack of leadership, rebellions or civil wars, unstable religion, and being unable to protect themselves from outsiders.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s a scary but a true reality that prejudice has the power to overshadow the facts and evidence, which can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. From the start of the play, juror 4 votes the defendant guilty of murder, not based on facts but entirely based on prejudice and stereotyping the defendant. The fact that the defendant “was born in a slum” (p.g 12) and the generalisation from the outside world: “Children from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.” (p.g 12) convince juror 4 that the defendant must be guilty. Because of prejudice, he cannot see the details like the defendant’s birthplace and circumstances may potentially be used to prove that he does not have a strong motive. As pointed out by the 8th Juror, the defendant was raised in a slum and had “been hit so many times” (p.g 11) that a few slaps from his father cannot make the defendant commit patricide. Therefore, the defendant does not have a strong motive. When we compare juror 8 and juror4’s reasoning, we can see that prejudice and stereotyping can veil the truth of the case and hide it from jurors and consequently prevent them from seeing the truth. However, juror 4 is only prejudiced at the start of…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law Midterm

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A defendant’s actions are the proximate cause of the victim’s death if the result occurs as a consequence of the defendant’s act. There is no other casually connected act. The defendant’s conduct is the direct cause of the harm.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies Crime Essay

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Statutory and judicial guidelines inform the exercise of judicable discretion in the area of sentencing. These guidelines aim to provide greater uniformity in sentencing matters and enhance the integrity of the process. Judicial guidelines are judgements from superior courts that aim to structure discretion, this is shown in the case R v Jurisic (1998), this case was used by the Criminal Court of Appeals to set guidelines that any non-custodial sentence for culpable driving should be exceptional. Judges are bound to any relevant legislation which impacts upon the sentencing process such as: The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) this prescribes the maximum sentence that may be imposed for various offences. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) this prescribes general guidelines in relation to sentencing. For example it identifies what might constitute a mitigating or aggravating circumstance. However, it is left to the exercise of judicial discretion as to how much weight should be given to such circumstances. Mandatory sentencing takes away the exercise of judicial discretion. The court has no choice but to impose the legislated sentence. Amendments to the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), have prescribed minimum non-parole periods for specific offences, such as ten years for aggravated sexual assault. The provision of statutory and judicial guidelines means that limits are placed on a judge’s discretion when sentencing, and this ensures sentencing consistency. However, some people feel that judges still have too much discretion when sentencing, and that some sentences are too lenient. Link…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jason. "Guilty" in this context refers to the person who is responsible for the tragedy of four deaths.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Hartley, R. D., & Rabe, G. A. (2008). Criminal Courts: Structures, Process, and Issues (2nd ed.).…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    of love and dust

    • 2408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Babb, Melissa V. “Ernest Gaines.” Chinese-American Literature. 20.1 (1993): 127-29. JSTOR. Web. 31 July 2014…

    • 2408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics