Preview

Gun Control

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1208 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control
For many years the controversial topic of gun control has sparked countless passionate debates. The arguments posed in these debates vary widely concerning the possible solutions to solving the problem of violent crime due to the possession of firearms. This paper introduces three different views concerning gun control. The first illustrates the freedom to own firearms. The second view advocates the complete restriction of firearms owned by citizens, and the last one presents a modified freedom of possessing firearms. Each faction seeks to have its position supported by national legislation. One of the big supporters of owning firearms is The Future of Freedom Foundation, known as FFF, who wants the absolute right to own any weapon. Their reasoning is that people in America can only protect themselves from stronger dangers if they own firearms. They point out that weak people like women on the street can defend themselves against an attacker, and fewer hostage situations would happen when people in America can carry guns with them. People of FFF freely say that more guns equals less crime, and that in some of the states where gun ownership is not highly controlled, lower crime rate is experienced. (Benedict D. LaRosa, October, 2002) Their argument is that after the government passed a gun control act in 1968, the crime rate climbed up in robbery cases from 138,000 in 1965 to 376,000 in 1972, while murders with guns increased from 5,015 to 10,379 in the same period according to the Census Bureau. They cite an example about New York, where the restrictions on guns are strong; the crime rate is higher than in Vermont, where gun controls are low. Also, they state where gun control is strictly enforced, illegal gun ownership is much higher. By allowing guns for citizens, the crime rate will decrease. They also considered this an economical solution for protection. (Benedict D. LaRosa) They support multiple gun ownership for each person so they can


References: McPherson, Scott. (2009,June 3). The Future of Freedom Foundation. The Second Amendment: More Important than Ever Control Reduce Crime? Retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0210e.asp Hornberger, G.,Jacob.(2000, July). The Future of Freedom Foundation. Sighting in the Second Amendment http://www.fff.org/freedom/0700a.asp National Rifle Association.(2009).About Us http://home.nra.org/#/home National Rifle Association.(2000, June) Violence. Retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/gunviolence/gunsinthehome

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since its birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, to hunt for food and to engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control takes on a proportion of extreme magnitude. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity. Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to increase the control of firearms sales and regulations.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control Since the days of the pioneers of the United States, firearms have been part of the American tradition as protection and a means of hunting or sport. As we near the end of the 20th century the use of guns has changed significantly. Because of fast and steady increase in crime and the fight for the right to own a hand gun, the introduction of legislation for gun control, to try to reduce the crime in the United States, has been a hotly debated issue in recent years. Although many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people, given in the second amendment "the right to bear arms", controlling distribution and sales and the registration of guns and gun owners is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns and the violence by criminals using guns. Many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people given in the second amendment the right "to bear arms". Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right To bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize law-abiding citizens while in no way preventing criminal use of handguns. It is also argued that by making it difficult for guns to be bought and registered for the American public there is a threat to the personal safety of American families everywhere. However controlling the sale and distribution of firearms is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns. In 1988 there were 9000 handgun related murders in America. Metropolitan centers and some suburban communities of America are setting new records for homicides by handguns. Larger Metropolitan centers have ten times the murder rate of all Western Europe. For example in Washington,D.C. there was an estimated 400 homicides including guns. In addition gun control has been seen as necessary because of the violence…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people believe that not everyone should be able to have access to guns mostly because people are getting killed accidentally, by crazy and by mentally ill people. But others believe that gun control will lead to gun confiscation. Then gun confiscation might lead to extermination. Nobody will be able to defend themselves. The article, “Rewriting the Second Amendment” talks about how people should have the ability to defend themselves with guns but, only for self defense. But a deal on expanding background checks is the new top goal for gun control, and Barack Obama is facing increasing pressure from many in his party to show leadership. Obama agrees to an individual's right to bear arms, in principle, but does not take it as an absolute right.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Gun Control

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun control is a controversial and divisive issue in our routine life, not only in the United States, but also all over the world. Basically, gun control refers to governmental efforts to limit or restrict the production, sale, possession and use of guns by private citizens. Some people believe that it is necessary that federal and state laws allow citizens to purchase and possess guns, or even actively require adult citizens to maintain weapons in their house, and periodically to train in their use. However, others think gun control is indispensable in our society because gunshots are the main cause of death in the United States. As for me, I prefer to support the second view because guns are lethal and the fewer people that have them the better. The only function of a gun is to kill. The more instruments of death are removed from our society, the safer we will be. With my research, I found a lot of striking data about guns menacing people’s lives. There should be gun control in the United States because guns are a menace to people’s lives.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun control is government regulation on the manufacture, sale, and possession of firearms. As a heavily debated and very controversial matter, many advocates undoubtedly have different opinions. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will discuss those differing opinions. Presented from two separate articles, the opinions discussed will be those of two different authors who have their own viewpoint as to why gun control is or isn’t necessary.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Controversy

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control in America should be limited based on second amendment rights that allow US citizens to protect themselves against their own government and in a private manner and limited changes in behavior by enforcing stronger laws. There has been controversy about gun control due to the recent public mass shootings and crime in our country. While stats can be used to persuade one way or another, true examination of mass shootings do not support arguments that ability to acquire guns is the true issue. In reviewing the position of the second amendment rights and facts related to private gun ownership and public mass shootings, research does not support increased regulations on guns as a means to reduce crime in the US.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies demonstrate that expanding legal access to weapons results in fewer crimes yet liberals push firearm control on the grounds that it builds the reliance of voters on government for assurance and protection. The political impact of firearm control is to move voters leftward, and henceforth the essential people who support gun control are the liberal media and radical politicians. Gun control is limitation or denial by the government of the privilege to armed self-defense, as assured by the Second Amendment of the United States of America Constitution. Genocide had happened when gun control initially disarmed the…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages

    life . Is it our right to bear arms as North Americans ? Or is it privilege? And…

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These three essays on the topic of gun control, “Both Sides Have Something to Fear” by David Ropeik, “We Can Ratchet Down the Passions” by Adam Winkler, and “A Divide Widened by Misunderstanding” by David Kopel, have many similarities in their views and opinions of the gun debate; i.e. to have gun rights or gun control. Not only their viewpoints, or lack thereof rather, but their timing from when these essays were written and their use of emotional ethos to grab the audience’s attention are all very similar. There also are a lot of differences between these three essays, such as who is in charge of the debate, and what caused the debate in the first place.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control has been in the spotlight for the past few months ever since the theatre shooting in colorado, and the sandy hook elementary shooting in Connecticut. This article is about the impact the shootings have had on a nation as a whole. It is about the two opposing sides which are in support of new stricter gun laws or preserving our second amendment right to bear arms. There are first hand interviews with victims parents from the sandy hook shooting and also with leaders of the NRA which strongly support our second amendment right. "Mourning this tragedy has extended beyond Newtown, beyond the borders of Connecticut, and has spread across the nation and the world," says Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy of the Sandy hook Elementary school shooting, which was the spark that ignited the controversial flame.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun control

    • 8712 Words
    • 35 Pages

    Many of us assume we must either oppose or support gun control. Not so. We have a range of alternatives. Even this way of speaking oversimplifies our choices since there are two distinct scales on which to place alternatives. One scale concerns the degree (if at all) to which guns should be abolished. This scale moves from those who want no abolition (NA) of any guns, through those who want moderate abolition (MA) - to forbid access to some subclasses of guns - to those who want absolute abolition (AA). The second scale concerns the restrictions (if any) on those guns that are available to private citizens. This scale moves from those who want absolute restrictions (AR) through those who want moderate restrictions (MR) to those who want no restrictions (NR) at all. Restrictions vary not only in strength but also in content. We could restrict who owns guns, how they obtain them, where and how they store them, and where and how they can carry them.…

    • 8712 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These people think that adding more gun laws would make the crime rates increase across the nation. Paul Guppy, Vice President for Research, for the online newspaper Washington Policy Center, states that “real-world experience shows that adding more gun control does not reduce violent crime. Washington, D.C. has some of the nation’s most restrictive gun control laws, and one of the worst violent crime rates in the country. Britain, Australia and Canada have all imposed sweeping gun laws in recent years, and violent crime rates have increased dramatically in each country” (Guppy). He goes on to say, “In fact, imposing more gun control is worse than ineffective, because it makes it harder for citizens to defend themselves when the police are not on hand to protect them. Research shows that guns are used thousands of times each year to prevent crimes” (Guppy). He thinks that if we take guns away from responsible, everyday citizens that they won’t be able to defend themselves. There are many instances that this would be true. American citizens should be allowed to defend themselves by any means necessary. There would be nothing stopping from shooting someone that breaks into my house and tries to do harm to me and my family. I wouldn’t hesitate one second. Mr. Guppy makes some very valid points, but do we want guns in every household in America? Seems like a scary…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the Coalition for Gun Control, last year a total of 291 people were killed by handguns in Australia, Sweden, Great Britain, Japan, and Switzerland. In the United States more than 24,000 people will be killed by the end of this year. So what is the big difference between the U.S. and these other countries? In these other countries it nearly impossible to buy any kind of gun. In these countries there are no gun shows. In these countries you can't buy a gun at a pawnshop or your local Wal-Mart. These countries have strict gun laws and are all about gun control. In this paper I will discus the correct interpretation of the Second Amendment, why guns are such a problem in the U.S., and why guns are more likely to kill a friend instead of a foe.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    They claim that other countries, with less crime because of strict regulations, are examples the U.S. could follow (Gun Control: Update). This is highly unreasonable because expanding upon gun ownership, in the U.S., has actually decreased violent crime. A 2010 article published by the NRA and the ILA notes, "Forty states have Right-to-Carry, and 48 states prohibit cities from imposing gun laws more restrictive than state law. And, since 1991, the total violent crime rate has declined over 40% to a 35-year low, and the murder rate has declined by half to a 45-year low” (Gun Control Reform) Therefore, the evidence proves that many of the states that allow citizens to carry concealed weapons have lower crime rates than those that do not. One example of broadening gun ownership would be the concealed carry law. In 1987, Florida enacted a concealed carry law. Before the law, Florida’s homicide rate was 11.7 per 100,000. By 1991, it dropped 20% to 9.4 per 100,000. Since adopting a concealed carry law, Florida’s total violent crime rate has dropped 32% and its homicide rate has dropped 58% (Stearns). Besides Criminals, Floridians are safer due to this law and Florida isn’t the only one. Texas’ violent crime rate has dropped 20% and homicide rate has dropped 31%, since enactment of its 1996 carry law (Stearns). A report by John Lott, Jr. and David Mustard of the University of Chicago released in 1996…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays