Why The United States Should Not Take Gun Control

Why the United States Should Not Seek Further Gun Control A common phenomenon in the United States is the ownership of guns by civilians for the purpose of personal protection and safety. However, the constitutional privilege has several challenges that the government has tried to solve by drafting laws and implementing policies that limit the use, sale, manufacture, possession, and transfer of guns (Jacobs 54). The issue of gun control is a hotly contested issue that has been discussed both in the academe and the political arena. The debate has attracted opponents and proponents who give varied reasons with regard to appropriate solutions to the problem of violence and crime in America. Different states deal with the problem in different ways. Some states have
Amidst all the raging debates regarding gun control, it is important to evaluate the issue from the perspective of the role that guns play in the lives of citizens. Crime has been on the rise in several American states. The rising cases of homicide in the past few years have prompted several states to implement stringent gun control laws that restrict purchase and possession of firearms by civilians. The American constitution allows civilians to own firearms for their own protection. However, this is not the main argument why gun control should not be allowed. This argument supports the need for Americans to protect themselves and their families. America does not need gun control but stringent policies that address the causes of gun misuse (Lott 83). Deinstitutionalization is one of the reasons why America does not need gun control. In the past few years, several cases of homicides and haphazard public shootings have been reported. These cases were the origin of debates by politicians for more stringent gun control laws in America. However, they failed to ask the most important question: what was the reason behind the