Preview

Gerrymandering: Election and Politicians

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1235 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gerrymandering: Election and Politicians
Gerrymandering

The term gerrymandering refers to the practice of altering voting districts in order to achieve electoral results favorable to one person or party, usually the incumbent politician or party creating the new voting regions.1 This term, dating back to 1812, is an established method for incumbent politicians to improve their heresthetical “defense,” by manipulating the dimensions of the political landscape.2 This tactic is extremely common in the United States and a prime example of politicians acting as manipulators. This essay will argue that politicians are manipulators, as evidenced by the gerrymandering of voting districts to improve odds of maintaining power, and opposition attempts to counteract this electoral maneuvering. The term “Gerrymander” originated in Boston in 1812 while Elbridge Gerry was governor of Massachusetts.3 In the previous year, Governor Gerry ratified a redistricting plan that greatly improved the odds of his Democratic-Republican Party in the state senate elections.4 Cartoonists in the Boston Gazette likened the shape of one of the contorted districts to a salamander, and writers in the Massachusetts Spy continued the metaphor by adding Gerry’s name, and accusing the governor of helping elect “Gerrymanders.”5 This term took hold, and was widely used by Federalists throughout the state to disparage the governor’s alteration of voting districts for political gain. Although the term “Gerrymandering” originated in New England in the early nineteenth century, the practice of manipulating electoral regions can be seen as early as 1788.6 Patrick Henry, of the Anti-Federalist party, strategically created the borders of the Fifth Congressional District to ensure that the noted Federalist James Madison would be unable to gain a congressional seat.7 This original gerrymander, although unsuccessful in its attempt to prevent James Madison from becoming elected, set the stage for the method political incumbents would go on to



Cited: Amy, Douglas J,. Real Choices/New Voices: How Proportional Representation Could Revitalize American Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002. Online. “Gerrymandering, Pure and Simple.” Editorial. The New York Times. 11 November 2009. Riker, William H. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Print. Robins, Michael D. Gerrymander and the Need for Redistricting Reform. Version 7. FraudFactor.com, 5 December 2000. Online. 4 December 2011. Stroupe Jr., Kenneth S. “Gerrymandering’s Long History in Virgina: Will This Decade Mark the End?” The Virginia News Letter. Volume 85 No. 1 (2009): 1-10. Online.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the 2010 census, Missouri had 9 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. After the census, Missouri lost a representative and now only has 8 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. This process of altering the number of representatives in a state after a census is known as reapportionment. As a result of this change in representation, Missouri also redrew its districts. The process of redrawing districts due to a census is known as redistricting. Unfortunately, this can lead to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the process of using redistricting for the purpose of obtaining a partisan or factional advantage.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political gerrymandering is the drawing of electoral district lines in a manner that discriminates against a political party. When used to insure party success, political gerrymandering is usually legal but can be contested. At this time it is legal to draw district lines to protect incumbents of both parties.…

    • 51 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus gerrymandering isn't unconstitutional. People can draw the districts however large or small that they want, there is no specification of what is lawful and what is not in the constitution There isn’t even a section or article in the entire constitution where it talks about redrawing districts. To be more specific there are no provisions (a condition or requirement in a legal document) outlined in the Constitution forbidding gerrymandering. Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state legislature, and a Republican was governor so of course they are going to draw districts into their favor; who wouldn’t? Furthermore there are little to no supreme court cases where gerrymandering was found unconstitutional. So if it is not unconstitutional or even in the constitution how can it be justiciable? The job of the supreme court is to uphold the constitution so if its constitutional it shouldn't be in the supreme…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the year 1794 John Swanwick won a stunning upset victory over Thomas Fitzsimons. This victory was for the 1794 Philadelphia congressional election. There were a large number of different economic as well as cultural issues that swayed the way in which voters made their selection. This essay intends to explore and exploit these crucial factors.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Excess vote” concentrates opposition supporters into a few districts. “Stacked vote” links distant areas of likeminded voters through oddly shaped boundaries.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack Flynt’s reelection and primary constituencies between his transitional and new districts are both similar and different in certain aspects. The transitional district was around from 1966 to 1970. Flynt’s transitional district represented about sixteen counties which added up to a population of about 323,000. The traditional district was not too different from his original district. “The district’s dominant economic interest was textiles, farming, and some light metal and food-processing industries” (Fenno, 2000, 16). The district was a one-party Democratic district which meant that the only “serious primary contest Flynt ever had in this district was his initial 1954 victory” (Fenno, 2000, 17). After the redistricting Flynt was given his first city, Macon, as well as his “first taste of two-party politics” (Fenno, 2000, 17). Flynt’s person-to-person representation strategy won over many of the counties especially the smaller counties. “Jack Flynt’s transitional district occupied a pivotal location in the path of that shift. The burgeoning Atlanta metropolitan area was exploding into the near suburbs and gradually pushing southward toward the small rural counties that formed the core of Flynt’s political support”(Fenno, 2000, 51).”For Flynt, the county seat elites made up the core of his primary constituency─ the people whose support he most needed, most wanted, and most assiduously cultivated. They were the essential cue givers of constituency politics, the individuals who provided the ‘elite certification’ of a candidate’s qualifications that is so essential to early political success” (Fenno, 2000, 21). Jack Flynt’s primary constituency also lied with county store proprietors and their customers would make up a large part of his reelection constituency (Fenno, 2000, 22). Flynt’s primary constituency during his transitional district was made of the county seat elites, white voters, voters with agricultural and textile…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [8] Page 6 - Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America - John H…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Bibby, J. (1979). Political parties and federalism: The Republican National Committee involvement in gubernatorial and legislative elections. Publius, 229--236.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of history many campaigns and elections have changed and been influenced by the time period surrounding them. The participation in political campaigns and elections in the United States between 1815-1840 greatly changed due to the significant effects of the War of 1812. As a new era formed as a result of the war, change in our nations politics did too. This new era known as “the era of good feelings” paved the way for change within our nations elections and campaigns. Just as it had united the voters of America in the beginning, its decline resulted in a growing show of sectionalism in the voters throughout the country.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 13 Vocabulary

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    11. Gerrymandering- When candidates deliberately shape a district in a way to include voters who are in favor of themselves or their party and exclude those who are not in favor.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue many people have is not with the idea of redistricting, but how it is used by political parties to maintain or a gain an advantage in Congress, a process known as gerrymandering (Stern 2017 par. 1). The main purpose of gerrymandering is to maintain a delegate advantage, without having a majority advantage within the…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past three decades, elections have ceased to give people the choice they are intended to have when voting for their senators and representatives. From 1975 to the present, incumbents have won their reelection bids over 90% of the time. Opponents to term limits point out that elections are designed to hold officials accountable to the people they are representing. Yet, congressmen use their large monetary funds, benefits, name recognition, and experience to end rival campaigns before they…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To the extent this country has advanced in technology and modern conveniences, some laws have not changed since the early days of the establishment of our nation. One area in particular which has in more recent years caused controversy is the function of the Electoral College. The functionality and purpose of the Electoral College has become outdated and should be revamped in order to bring the system in to the twenty-first century. The world has changed and representation through the Electoral College is no longer functional. The Electoral College should be abolished and replaced by a system which allows for a more even distribution of the popular vote nationwide. William Beaman, author of “Words We Remember” has such a negative view of the Electoral College for many reasons but he specifically feels:…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass Democracy

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The years between 1820 and 1840 were filled with history altering social and political changes which continue to affect our society today. These changes all revolve around the new concept of mass democracy, in which the common man or farmer controlled the vote and the way things were ran in government. This was made possible by the new reduced voting restrictions that gave all white males the right to vote, and not just wealthy land owning white males. Mass democracy’s formation led to new campaigning strategies for politicians, newly formed political parties which played a necessary part in the use of the nation’s checks and balance system for political power, and new ideas for the betterment of the country. Leaders such as John Marshall, Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay, and William Henry Harrison had to decide whether to adapt to the constantly changed political ideas of the majority, or continue instituting the federalist views laid out by their forefathers, despite their unpopularity. Thanks to this adaption to change, these men were able to recognize the social and political changes occurring and give the country mass democracy.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays