Preview

Freedom and Determinism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom and Determinism
Freedom and Determinism "We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its past and the cause of its future. An intellect which at a certain moment would know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all items of which nature is composed, if this intellect were also vast enough to submit these data to analysis, it would embrace in a single formula the movements of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the tiniest atom; for such an intellect nothing would be uncertain and the future just like the past would be present before its eyes." (Laplace 1814) Laplace's demon was the first published articulation of scientific determinism. Determinism is the idea that at any one instant there is exactly one physically possible future with no alternatives. The two philosophical theories that deal with the problem of free will that I find to be the most persuasive are determinism and compatabilism. Compatabilism is the theory that free will and determinism are both logically compatible. Compatabilist free will is defined as the mental deliberation leading up to an action, and is therefore compatible with determinism. The determinist theory is as follows: Premise 1: No action is free if it must occur. Premise 2: For any event X there are antecedent causes that ensure the occurrence of X in accordance with mechanical causal laws. Conclusion: No action is free. The first premise states what is meant by a “free” action. The second premise is the thesis of determinism, the notion that every event is a result of causal natural laws which account for its occurrence. For the hard determinist, it is obvious that nothing is uncaused, and if causes are present, then the effects must occur. Since everything that happens is the effect of some cause or set of causes, then everything must occur therefore nothing is free. Because you as a person must exist in space and time then your actions are not free, because your existence is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    a controversy between whether or not a person has free will. He states that a determinist,…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHL 458 Week 1

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Free will is the power to make choices freely without any constraints or compulsions. Free will is a voluntary decision and an independent choice. It is the “capacity to respond in ways that oppose even the strongest influences” (Ruggiero, 2009). People possess free will. This is the reason why people’s decisions are unpredictable. Free will helps a person form thoughts. No matter the pressure or force placed on a person, the person will act on his or her own free will when making decisions.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are three main positions in the free will debate; determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism. In my opinion, the strongest argument of these is compatibilism due to it agreeing with my views and beliefs on the subject of free will.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The stereotypical definition of determinism, to the layman, goes something like this: "All events are predetermined so we have no free will." Actually, this is more or less the definition of hard determinism. Determinism, however, according to professor of philosophy Sandra LaFave, can co-exist with free will in the form of soft determinism, the philosophical theory that all events indeed have causes but that humans can still act voluntarily. Soft determinism provides a more widely-acceptable definition of determinism that agrees more with common usage of the words "free will" and "cause."…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate between freewill and determinism stems from the apparent conflict between the universal rule of causality that is deeply rooted in nature, and between the apparent ability of human beings to choose between multiple courses of action in order to lead to the most desirable outcome. The universal rule of causality simply claims that inorganic matter such as tables, chairs and rocks are acted upon by whatever forces affect it, however, human beings seem to be an exception to this rule by their unique ability to ponder about how to go about making decisions in their life and which…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been recommended by some that humans have the capability of demonstrating free will and mindful choice to be a part of or engage in criminal behaviour. Others have recommended that our behaviour is 'pre-established'. With reference to “AJCSD Criminal Behaviour – Free Will v. Determinism” the document critically analyses the above argument from a phycological perspective with regard to free will and determinism stating that freedom has never been absolute, free will and determinism has been a very important aspect in trying to explain and define causality of criminal behaviour it’s important to note that, free will and determinism polarises psychology and law.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These laws determine many aspects of life however the agent experiencing the universe has a certain degree of free will when it comes to making decisions. An understanding of the concepts of free will and determinism is required to explore the issue of if they are compatible. Determinism is the theory that every single event and action is caused by prior events and that agents or events could not have happened any other way. Free will states that we “could of chosen other wise” (Pereboom,). Actions and events being caused by previous circumstances are known as “causal determinism” (Pereboom).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    philosophy 3.2

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    >>> 3. What is stace's explanation of how all our actions have causes ,yet some actions are free?…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Consider this. Sadie walks into the store intending to buy M&Ms. Instead she chooses against it because she would rather have Skittles. So she checks out and merrily goes on her way with her Skittles. Is this free will? What if she had wanted to buy marijuana, but that was not there because it is illegal? Is that still free will? Or is someone or something controlling the choices she makes? Or how about this case. Joe gets arrested for stealing. He goes to jail without having the option to say no. Is this free will? Well, it was free will when Joe was stealing. Joe chose to steal, therefore he received the punishment, which was made clear in laws for that county. Yes, that is free will. But, do we really have free will, or are we given guidelines that make us believe we have free will but in reality are controlled by someone in authority?…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Determinism

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hard Determinism Defined and Defended In this paper I intend to thoroughly introduce, explain, and defend the theory of hard determinism. This theory as defended by Robert Blatchford will be presented and explained using two examples. Both libertarianism and soft determinism will be given a brief overview and will have their primary objections considered and rejected.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Determinist

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, by Sober, it mentions three views of freedom: hard determinism, libertarian, and soft determinism. Being a hard determinist means you do not have free will, an incompatibilist, and causal determinist. Libertarians are free and incompatibilist; soft determinist are people that say that we do have free will and are causal determinism. An incompatibilist has many options and is free to pick any one of the choices. A causal determinist is when events turn out the same even if you go back in time. In this essay I am going to argue that we should be hard determinist because we do not have free will to choose our genes and environment.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robert Boyle believed that the universe (observable objects) was made up of tiny bodies called corpuscles and these tiny bodies were thought to bring about large-scale phenomena by moving around and interacting in specific ways. These corpuscles are innumerable and are of a determinate size and shape and are either in motion or at rest. According to Boyle, motion is considered the grand agent of all that happens in nature and the reason for why things occur. (Journal of History and of Philosophy, Volume 12)…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suppose that every event or action has a sufficient cause, which brings that event about. Today, in our scientific age, this sounds like a reasonable supposition. After all, can you imagine someone seriously claiming that when it rains, or when a plane crashes, or when a business succeeds, there might be no cause for it? Surely, human behavior is caused. It doesn't just happen for any reason at all. The types of human behavior for which people are held morally accountable are usually said to be caused by the people who engaged in that behavior. People typically cause their own behavior by making choices; thus, this type of behavior might be thought to be caused by your own choice-makings. This freedom to make your own choices is free will.<br><br>Determinism, a philosophical doctrine against freedom, is the theory stating that all events, physical and mental (including moral choices), are completely determined by previously existing causes that preclude free will. This theory denies the element of chance or contingency, as well as the reality of human freedom, holding that the "will" is not free but is determined by biological, environmental, social, or mystical imperatives. Since every event in our lives is determined by outside causes, then we are just some sort of robots. Freedom, on the other hand, is rooted behind the idea that we do have control over the choices we make, thus having free will, a requirement for being morally accountable for an action. But if determinism is true, and we have no control over the choices we make, then we do not have free-will; and therefore, nobody can ever legitimately be held morally accountable for anything. Our common practice of thinking of others and ourselves as accountable is simply not justified!<br><br>There are those who think that our behavior is a result of free choice, but there are others who presume "we are servants of cosmic destiny or that behavior is nothing but a reflex of heredity and environment." The…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those supporters of free will don’t claim that everything happens without a cause. They instead claim that in most cases, the events are results of human’s free choices and without causes. For example, my choice to turn in this assignment today was not caused by anyone or anything other than my free will. I was free to choose whether I’m turning the assignment in or ignore the assignment and failing this course. Now, we can realize that there’s a problem in believing determinism and free will. They seem conflict and it’s implausible to believe both. When we believe the premise 1, which is the determinism -- According to the theory of determinism, everything happens with a cause. However, Believing No.1 does not mean we have to also believe determinism. The No. 1 premise only states that if we think the determinism is true, we must admit that everything happens with a cause. Here is what the compatibilist reject about, they can’t reject to believe the determinism because determinism is true, so they start to make rejection to the premise No.2 which is a rejection to the free will. It states if we admit that everything happens with a cause, then there’s no point for the human choices to exist – no matter what choice you make is caused by something happened previously. The compatibilist rejects this premise and they think even if everything happens is…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The compatibility of hard determinism and libertarianism is the view of compatibilists. Hard determinists do not see this compatibility as they see libertarians as their complete opposites. Libertarians believe we have free will. Whereas hard determinists believe we have no free wil what so ever, they believe our life is predetermined as all our actions have causes making our action predetermined.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays