Frankenstein, the Modern Prometheus?

Topics: Frankenstein, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Mary Shelley Pages: 5 (1367 words) Published: April 11, 2005
In order to illustrate the main theme of her novel "Frankenstein", Mary Shelly draws strongly on the myth of Prometheus, as the subtitle The Modern Prometheus indicates. Maurice Hindle, in his critical study of the novel, suggests, "the primary theme of Frankenstein is what happens to human sympathies and relationships when men seek obsessively to satisfy their Promethean longings to "conquer the unknown" - supposedly in the service of their fellow-humans". This assertion is discussed by first describing the Promethean connection. Thereafter, the two forms of the myth, Prometheus the fire-stealer and Prometheus the life-giver are reviewed in the context of Shelly's use of the myth in her novel and their relationship to the main theme. Finally, the character of Frankenstein as a modern Prometheus of the scientific age is discussed in the context of English Romantic literature.

This "Promethean longing" mentioned by Hundle, is the connection between Victor Frankenstein and Robert Walton. They both seek to gain knowledge of the unknown. Victor Frankenstein's obsession with occult scientific knowledge results in the destruction of his family and friends, whilst Walton, the narrator of the story, causes many deaths by his obsessive journey to the North Pole.

Shelly's use of the Prometheus myth combines the two versions of the legend, Prometheus the "fire-stealer" and Prometheus the "life-giver". According to the Ancient Greeks, in the first version of the myth, the Titan, Prometheus, in rebellion against Zeus, took fire from the sun and gave it to humankind to warm them and enable them to make tools and weapons, thereby allowing them to rise above other animals. Zeus was incensed by Prometheus' disobedience, and as punishment, ordered Prometheus chained to a rock, where his liver was eaten by eagles each day and restored each night so that his torment could be prolonged for eternity.

The second, Roman version of the myth, comes from Ovid's Metamorphoses, which, according to Newey (1993), Mary Shelly read in 1815. In this version Prometheus was the Creator who made man from clay and breathed life into him. This relates directly to the quotation on the title page of Shelly's book. "Did I request thee Maker, from my clay to mould me man. Did I solicit thee from darkness to promote me? Although a quotation from Milton's "Paradise Lost" the plaintive cries of Frankenstein's neglected, in-human progeny can be heard in these words.

In relation to the first version of the Promethean myth, there are several fire-like analogies in Shelly's novel. Frankenstein's Monster discovered that fire can be both a necessity for survival, when he was alone in the mountains, and a means of revenge and destruction, when he set fire to the De Laceys' hut. Shelley hints that her character Victor Frankenstein, uses "fire" in the form of electricity to animate his Monster, this can be seen in the passage where Victor relates to Walton part of his inspiration for the creation of life: "I beheld a stream of fire issue from an old and beautiful oak . . . and so soon as the dazzling light vanished the oak had disappeared, and nothing remained but a blasted stump. . . . I eagerly inquired of my father the nature and origin of thunder and lightning. He replied, "Electricity." (page 23). Similarly, when he is ready to impart life into his creation "I collected the instruments of life around me, that I might infuse a spark of being into the lifeless form". (page 34).

In the early 19th Century, when Mary Shelley was writing Frankenstein, electricity was a new and wondrous science. Science and industry were making gigantic strides and Shelly mistrusted these advances seeing in them something inhuman and that there were areas of knowledge best left alone (Hindle, 1994). The characters of Walter and Frankenstein show the two paths that the pursuit of the unknown can take – one leads to...

Bibliography: Griffith, G. V. 1997 Frankenstein in the Context of the Romantic Era. Retrieved April 2004 from
Hindle, M. 1994, Mary Shelley Frankenstein Penguin Books, London
Hunter, J. P. (ed.), 1996, Mary Shelley Frankenstein. The 1818 Text, Contexts, Nineteenth-Century Responses, Modern Criticism, W.W. Norton & Company, New York
Newey, K. 1993, Mary Shelley 's Frankenstein Sydney University Press, Sydney
Schmidt, A. 1999, The Myth of Prometheus, Retrieved April 2004 from
Oates, J.C. 1984 Frankenstein 's Fallen Angel, in Critical Inquiry, Vol 10 No.3. Retrieved April 2004 from
Study Guide LCS16 1999.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Is Victor Frankenstein the Modern Prometheus? Essay
  • Essay on Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus is
  • Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus Essay
  • Is Frankenstein the Modern Day Prometheus? Essay
  • Frankenstein as the Modern Prometheus Essay
  • The Modern Prometheus Essay
  • Frankenstein: a Modern Prometheus Essay
  • Frankenstein prometheus Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free