Preview

Frankenstein and the Possibility of Cloning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Frankenstein and the Possibility of Cloning
Frankenstein

Back when the story of “Frankenstein” was written by Mary Shelley, the thought of either cloning or creating a living organism from non living parts was simply a thought at most. It was an idea that nobody believed could ever come true, but today it is happening. The scientific and technological advancements in society today have led to a promising change in the cloning and creation of organisms. There are two articles that specifically discuss the possibility of creating a real Frankenstein which will be addressed in the following paragraphs.
The article “Human Cloning Within 50 Years” discusses the predictions of scientists having the ability to clone humans within the next 50 years. Scientist Sir John Gurdon of great Britain says that people who have lost a baby to either a disease or other problems will be able to create another baby with the same DNA as the one that they lost. Sir John Gurdon is the same scientist who cloned dolly the sheep in 1996 with successful results. Gurdon predicts that there will be major controversy over the action of cloning but after it has been done and proven to work he says people will accept it as they do with in-vitro fertilization. Gurdon states that In-vitro fertilization was regarded with extreme suspicion before it actually produced successful results in 1978 and now it is widely accepted, which he believes will happen with cloning in the future. Creating Humans in such a way could change the world as we know it, not quite like how Shelly envisioned it in the frankenstein story but it will still make a difference. Cloning could also pose some major problems for society due to the fact that it could result in deformations and complications in the growth of the child. Although Frankenstein's story is a little far fetched in a way that body parts were simply sewn together and a man was created, there are a lot of similarities as the modern day theory of cloning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Victor Frankenstein and the Creature appear to be completely different people. But their personalities it stands out that they are a mirror image of each other. The creature and Victor both share a strong love of knowledge but they can’t control their obsession with it so it often results in tragedy. Victor became obsessed with the science and creation of life. The Creature on the other hand became obsessed with humans. The creature observed a poor family that lived in a cottage and became obsessed with learning about them. The creature approaches the family trying to make friends and gets ran off for his looks and he learns that humans are quick to judge. The creature begins to grow a hate for humans because he realizes that he will never…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since the birth of the first cloned sheep, named Dolly, the dream of human cloning has existed (Van Dijck, 1999). Cloning a mammal is described as the manipulation of an animal or human cell in order to create an identical copy of that animal’s or human’s nucleic DNA (Andrews, 1997). Though the dream of a human clone also comes with a lot of controversy regarding ethics and morals. Embryotic stem cell research, which could lead to a renewable source of human tissue, cells and eventually entire organs (Bowring, 2004), is highly controversial due to the necessity of placing a cloned embryo into a woman’s body in order to achieve that research. Politicians differentiate between therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning as they refer to the second as “implanting a cloned embryo in a woman's womb” (Bowring, 2004), as for the embryo itself the research is not very therapeutic. Furthermore cloning by transfer of nuclei is not very effective yet as only 1% of manipulated sheep eggs reach adulthood and the number is even lower for other animals (Solter, 2000). The question whether human cloning will ever be possible and ethical remains to be answered but it seems certain that extra research in embryotic stem cells will improve techniques and success rates, which eventually brings the realization of a human clone closer one step at a time.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leon Kass, a medical researcher at Harvard University has said that “Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.” While what he says about cloning becoming an imminent problem may not be necessarily true Mary Shelley, the author of “Frankenstein”, and Lewis Thomas, author of “On Cloning a Human Being”, have similar stances on the negative effect synthetic creation of human life would have on the world. In Frankenstein Victor, a man raised around learning in the early 1800’s gained an interest in natural sciences after being exposed to it by one of his professors. He soon delves into the art of galvanism which eventually leads to the creation of his monster. Disturbed by his creature’s appearance Victor ditches him to fend for himself.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this novel, Victor Frankenstein is a scientist that has a very strong passion for how the human body is put together. His passion quickly turns obsessive when he starts pondering around the idea of making a human from scratch. He locks himself away in his apartment so no one can see what he is creating. One night when the creation was finished, Victor brought the monster to life. The looks of the monster terrified Victor and he abandoned it. Throughout this story, the monster teaches himself different skills and also does a lot of horrible things that Victor Frankenstein should take the blame for since he is the creator.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 19th century reader of the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley was treated to a tale of fantastic proportions. A story of a monster that was created from parts of corpses and could be brought to life would have been an extremely scary story. They would not know if the creation of a monster in this way was really a scientific possibility. The 21st century audience however, now knows that this is not scientifically possible. The fear that was struck in the hearts of the 19th century reader by this monster is now gone. With this in mind the story of Frankenstein now has to be altered to conjure the same fear in our current society of that which existed in the hearts of the original audience. In Hollywood's remakes of the original novel the monster is not the same monster as was in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Hollywood has used aesthetics, science and dehumanization of the monster to turn the story of Frankenstein into movies that would reflect our current society. This essay will strive to draw connections from the original text, empirical research and Hollywood's modern day film remakes of Frankenstein to demonstrate how the monster has been changed and turned into a monster that our society can understand.…

    • 2723 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein is one of the most famous novels of the century and has had many movies created based on this classic tale, yet each version, the book, as well as the three movies, have a lot of differences which make each one very unique. These similarities and differences are not only seen in the characters of Victor Frankenstein and the creation, but also throughout the storyline. So many people today get the impression that Frankenstein is all about a mad man who creates a monster who then goes on a rampage and kills innocent people, but there is so much more to this story that people seem to miss. They miss that it is also a story of equality, trust, facing your fears, and love vs. hate. I had a chance to view all of these movies, along with reading this moving book, and am now going to present the similarities, differences, and morals that stood out to me in all of these.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Victor Frankenstein was one of the first on the list of people in history who were unsuccessful at creating a new and perfect human. Unlike others who experimented on live humans, Dr. Frankenstein took body parts from dead people and pieced them together. Although he successfully gave life to a creature, the ugliness of it terrified Dr. Frankenstein and many others. Throughout the story, the monster demonstrates its complexity by showing human-like attributes: feelings, ability to learn, and possibly the ability to reproduce. This brings up the question, did scientists and doctors have the knowledge and technology to have created…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story, after creating the monster, Victor creates an ethical dilemma. This brings about the question, could this happen in real life? With cloning, it can. Examples in Frankenstein can compare to cloning and prove that a modern Frankenstein can exist. One quote is: ““When I found so astonishing a power placed within my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it” (Shelley 51). Frankenstein contemplated the idea of how the creation of life could be used in society. Similarly, cloning at first was contemplated to consider where it could be used: in the sciences, to clone soldiers, or to be sold to the public. When cloning came out in the national…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the course of Frankenstein, Viktor Frankenstein undergoes a drastic emotional transformation as a result of his experiments which resulted in the creation of his Creature. Frankenstein's trips to Montavert, and his descriptions of the scene on his solitary excursions, show a clear sense of an emotional 'before and after.' In his visits to Montavert before the birth of his Creature, Frankenstein saw a sublime and beautiful scene. However, his accounts are drastically different - upset, guilty and disturbed - when Viktor returns, after leaving his Creature and experiencing the deaths of his brother William, and the wrongful execution of Justine Moritz. These drastic changes in Frankenstein's emotions are shown through his portrayals of nature. These changes in Frankenstein can also be seen as a parallel to the changes undergone by Mary Shelley in her own life, reflecting the disillusionment she felt with Romantic literature.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The human mind is something scientists have been trying to comprehend forever. Science can not alter how the mind communicates with one’s body, or even how it works. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein uses the creation of a fake being to emphasize the fact that the human mind cannot be altered or replicated effectively. Dr. Frankenstein thought he would be able to create and control the mind of a creature. He had tried many times, but to no avail. After talking with a professor, he finally figured out a way that he would be able to complete what he had been trying to for years. But does Frankenstein pass that natural boundary placed before us by our peers? To create life, a being with its own mind, had never been done before. What are the consequences of his actions and was it truly worth it to go beyond those limits?…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (Aurelia et al. 3). In other words, cloning is a method of producing a child who has exactly the same genes or parent. (Aurelia et al. 3). The most common cloning technique is called Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) which involves putting the nucleus of a body cell into an egg from which the nucleus has been removed. This produces a clonal embryo, which is triggered to begin developing with chemicals or electricity. Placing this cloned embryo into the uterus of a female animal and bringing it to term creates a clone, with genes identical to those of the animal from which the original body cell was taken ("About Reproductive Cloning"). In Frankenstein, electricity is the tool which creates life and eventually creates “the monster”. Earlier medical experiments, including Galvanism, lead Victor Frankenstein to fantasize about the possibilities of creating life using the power of electricity and the body of a once living man. Mary Shelley seemed to be predicting into the future where, a modern day Victor Frankenstein would succeed in reanimating the lifeless or more inimical to our society: synthetically creating life. In fact, scientists have already cloned an animal. The first cloned mammal, named Dolly the sheep, died at the age of 6 years. The death of the first cloned mammal was followed by a lively debate related issues / ethical aspects of cloning, some of which continue the debate today. Only 1% of animal cloning made so far have had a positive result, but most of them have suffered serious disorders. The conclusion of experts is that the current level of technology, human cloning is very dangerous (Aurelia et al. 1) Many scientists even believe that reproductive cloning can never be made…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are obvious similarities between Victor and his creation; each is abandoned, isolated, and both start out with…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was one very quiet night when the lights went out in the city of Albuquerque. The whole city thought that a transformer blew up. But, one girl in the city was freaking out and panicking. She knew something that no one else knew.She kept looking outside her window as if something was out there. Her parents kept telling her just to go to bed that their was nothing out there. She kept yelling “ No! No! No! they're going to take me away! I don't want them to take me again!!” Her parents just left her in her room, and she just kept on looking at the window. The window was dark; the only thing that gave out light was the moonlight. She got closer to the window thinking that maybe her parents were right that there is nothing out there. So, she…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reproductive cloning on the other hand won’t be good as well. In the article's reproductive cloning arguments pro and con it is mentioned that “Reproductive cloning would diminish the uniqueness of an individual.” Reproducing a child is the most beautiful moment you can experience. Mostly because your partner (that you love) and you have created a human being that won’t look similar to any other person. Cloning yourself to have a “child” will ruin the perspective of bearing or raising an actual kid. Having a clone as your “child” wouldn’t be a great idea. Hhaving a kid is a major difference than having a kid that looks exactly like you in every way. Those who can’t bear children because of multiple reasons have the opportunity to adopt a child. Why want more when you can get a kid without going through so much…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human cloning has been a significant theme in Science Fiction for many years, with its portrayal often being that of negative or ‘evil’ influence. Although the term ‘clone’ was never used within the novel, one of the first Science Fiction works about human cloning is Aldous Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’, which depicts a world in which human reproduction has been manipulated and babies are grown in…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics