Preview

Foreign Support Henry Tudor Bosworth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1062 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foreign Support Henry Tudor Bosworth
In 1484, Richard III made a deal with the Duke of Brittany in order to have Henry Tudor returned to England. However, Tudor was told of this agreement and fled into France, joining the French Court. This caused him to form bonds in the court of France and in turn lead the King of France, King Charles VIII to offer Tudor 60,000 livres to assemble 4000 men. Of these, 1500 were discharged soldiers from a base at Pont de l'Arche. The French soldiers were commanded by a nobleman from Savoy called Philibert de Chandée. He was also given ships to travel in. This was central to Henry’s victory as it gave him the means to travel to England and was therefore able to challenge Richard and claim the throne. It made sure he had soldiers who would fight on his behalf and showed that Henry had strong, royal backing. If he hadn’t been given these gifts then he would have been unable to seize the throne.
Philibert de Chandée and the French soldiers were an essential part of Henry’s foreign policy and form an important factor in Henry’s foreign policy. Philibert de Chandée was an experienced military leader in France and knew many battle skills. During the battle, de Chandée led a swift tactical move which saved Henry Tudor from death in Richard’s charge. De Chandée was given the new Earldom of Bath as a reward after the battle. The presence of the French mercenaries added strength to Tudor’s army, assisting his victory. The skill of these Frenchmen with the expertise of Philibert de Chandée saved Henry’s life therefore preventing an early loss and by default allowing him to win. The French soldiers also provided skilled support if no other support was pledged to Tudor on the battlefield, saving him for embarrassment and having to forfeit his claim. This reason also gave him the confidence to launch his assault on England, knowing there was little emphasis on gaining extra support although it would have been gladly appreciated.
Henry Tudor had fled abroad many years

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In addition Henry signed the treaty of Etaples with France, the most dominating country which had the biggest chance of overthrowing Henry; they used trading as a form of bargaining which meant their trading relations were inconsistent. By signing the treaty of Etaples it meant that France was not allowed to back any pretenders and both countries had to agree to reduce restrictions on trade. Their relationship improved significantly and it also led to France in 1495 to end all the restrictions to secure English neutrality in the Italian…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Controlling nobility was important to Henry and arguably posed to be one of the biggest challenges he faced. He relied on them for a number of reasons but he also knew the importance of keeping them under control, since they had been responsible in part for overthrowing the last three kings at one time or another. As well as financial policies, he also passed a number of non-financial policies, which contributed to the change in relations between the nobles and the crown during his reign.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaining international recognition and influence for England was a big part of Henry’s foreign policy; this was because England had not been an active part of European affairs since the end of the hundred year’s war in 1453. So with Henry’s ascension to the throne and wanting to make g his mark this was a very important factor on judging how effective the foreign policy was because this was one of the more consistent of the factors of the foreign policy from 1515 to 1529. An example was in 1513 Henry gained Tournai and Therouanne, this is a good example of how the foreign policy was effective as Tournai was a significant achievement as although it wasn’t a city of great economic or strategic importance it was internationally known therefore bringing England prestige, this would add to the international recognition got England. The capture of Therouanne in the same year also meant that Henry was gaining…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War of the Roses was a crucial and significant period in the England’s history playing an important role in it. There were many factors which can be seen as the causes of the war. However, it is vital to clarify to what extent its outbreak was caused by Henry’s inadequacies.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His claim to the throne was more sensible than Simnel’s – he impersonated Richard, Duke of York and gained a large amount of support from foreign powers – France, Scotland, Ireland and Burgundy...this was only because he constantly had to flee from country to country when supported dropped as a result of Henrys treaty's. As such, Warbeck dominated Henry’s foreign policy for nearly 10 years, and in the end cost him over £13,000, which, as a new king, was financially crippling. These factors suggest Warbeck was a threat, which he potentially may have been, particularly if he had timed his invasion right to coincide with the Cornish…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main political motivation for English Imperialism was due to the rivalries with its European Counterparts. Initially, European countries were looking for a water passage to China so they would be able to trade for their goods. Spain, who lead the charge, landed in Central and South America, captured gold and silver. From this the Spain were able to grow their army and hence, their political power. Next in line were the France who landed in North America and discovered the land to be ripe with animal pelts which brought great wealth to the French (Norton, 2015). The Dutch had found the same success…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moreover Tudor had a very strong tactical setup going into the war, the vanguard, under the control of the Earl of oxford, was strengthened by the mercenaries of Philibert de Chandee, Sir Gilbert Talbot commanded the right wing and john savage on the left wing. However, the most important part of their strategy was the Stanley’s. The Stanley’s had been pushing towards the side of Richard due to the capture of Lord Strange, However during the time leading up to the battle negotiations and meetings between Tudor and the Stanley’s were building and Richard started to question whether he could trust them. Tudor began to gain more and more support as he travelled through wales and the key sign of allegiance to Tudor was when the Stanley family advised the bailiffs of Shrewsbury to open the town gates to let them in. So, the Stanley’s did not actively fight at the beginning of the battle but their betrayal soon became apparent when they attacked Richard near the conclusion of the battle. Other higher powers that Richard thought he would have the support of also backed out, for example Northumberland decided to not take part in the battle at all.…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the barons were making peace agreements with each other, many did it only to secure their war gains. In 1153 Henry travelled back to England, he had support in both North and East. Henry took oaths of loyalty from many…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry VII took the throne after a battle against the former king Richard III whose forces outnumbered Henrys by two to one. Henry VII had a couple of big problems, one of them was that there were people that had a stronger claim to the throne than he did, his only claim was that god let him win the battle, therefore the nobility didn’t respect him at the beginning of his reign. Another of the problems he faced was the fact that he feared a lot about his security and about his son, and in order to keep his family and himself safe, he signed treaties with other countries so they didn’t attack each other because Henry, not being a conventional king, preferred peace than war.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists realised that they needed help if they were going to win the war, so the France getting involved was perhaps one of the most important factors that led to the success of the colonists. It was Benjamin Franklin who asked the French to help in the resistance. The French, who were defeated during the Seven Years of War, saw the colonists’ rebellion as an opportunity to hurt the British. So, on February 6, 1778, representatives from both sides signed the Treaty of Alliance and the Treaty of Amity, which stated that the colonists and French were now working together. The French supplied the colonists with arms, ammunition, and troops. The colonists utilized the French’s help in crucial future battles. Without the extra supplies and…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you agree with the view that it was virtually impossible for effective opposition to form against Henry VIII’s Reformation? Explain your answer, using sources 1, 2 and 3 and your own knowledge. (40 marks)…

    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VII and Retaining

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Retaining involved magnates taking men into their service, generally involving the payment of fees and sometimes the granting of a distinctive badge or uniform (livery).…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments can be considered to have dealt poorly with rebellion on account of repeated noble support for rebellions throughout the period. The support of the nobility was crucial to maintaining control of the localities and additionally, noble support of a rebellion could increase the risk of a rebellion overthrowing the monarch. This was due to the likely contribution of funds to bolster supplies and troops with the involvement of retainers and experienced foreign mercenaries. Lack of noble co-operation with the government could also increase the threat of rebellion. This can be seen in the Cornish rebellion of…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays