Preview

Ford finance analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1007 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ford finance analysis
Evaluation of the financial stability
Balance sheet

Period Ending
Dec 31, 2012
Dec 31, 2011
Dec 31, 2010

Assets
Current Assets

Cash And Cash Equivalents
15,659,000
17,148,000
14,805,000

Short Term Investments
20,284,000
18,618,000
20,765,000

Net Receivables
82,338,000
78,541,000
8,381,000

Inventory
7,362,000
5,901,000
5,917,000

Other Current Assets
-
-
-

Total Current Assets
125,643,000
120,208,000
49,868,000
Long Term Investments
3,246,000
2,936,000
72,639,000
Property Plant and Equipment
41,393,000
35,209,000
34,854,000
Goodwill
-
-
-
Intangible Assets
87,000
100,000
102,000
Accumulated Amortization
-
-
-
Other Assets
5,000,000
4,770,000
5,221,000
Deferred Long Term Asset Charges
15,185,000
15,125,000
2,003,000

Total Assets
190,554,000
178,348,000
164,687,000

Liabilities
Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable
68,715,000
63,093,000
60,206,000

Short/Current Long Term Debt
-
-
-

Other Current Liabilities
-
-
-

Total Current Liabilities
68,715,000
63,093,000
60,206,000
Long Term Debt
105,058,000
99,488,000
103,988,000
Other Liabilities
-
-
-
Deferred Long Term Liability Charges
470,000
696,000
1,135,000
Minority Interest
42,000
43,000
31,000
Negative Goodwill
-
-
-

Total Liabilities
174,285,000
163,320,000
165,360,000

Stockholders' Equity
Misc Stocks Options Warrants
322,000
-
-
Redeemable Preferred Stock
-
-
-
Preferred Stock
-
-
-
Common Stock
40,000
38,000
38,000
Retained Earnings
18,077,000
12,985,000
(7,038,000)
Treasury Stock
(292,000)
(166,000)
(163,000)
Capital Surplus
20,976,000
20,905,000
20,803,000
Other Stockholder Equity
(22,854,000)
(18,734,000)
(14,313,000)

Total Stockholder Equity
15,947,000
15,028,000

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    depreciation 140,000 260,000 469,000 Intangible assets Patents—at cost less amortization 36,000 Total assets $1,354,200 PROBLEM 5-3 (Continued) Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities Notes payable, secured by investments of $120,000 $ 94,000 Accounts due 148,000 Accrued expenditures 49,200 Total existing debts $ 291,200 Long-term liabilities 8% bonds payable, due January 1, 2018 400,000 Less: Unamortized discount on bonds due 20,000 380,000 Total debts 671,200 Stockholders’ equity Common stock Authorized 600,000 shares of $1 par value; issued and outstanding, 500,000 shares $500,000 Premium on common stock 45,000 545,000 Saved income 138,000 683,000 Total debts and stockholders’ equity $1,354,200 30 Points CA 24-2 Item 1…

    • 807 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fin 516 Mini Case Week 2

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Using the Fiscal YE filings 1/29/2012 balance sheet: $10,788 Million (debt…. Long Term Bank Loans, Bonds & Debentures, and their Short Term Portions) / $116,918 Million (equity + debt) = .09x (times) Which is very strong. There is financial risk in HD’s exposure to the market in terms of fluctuations in interest rates, and Interest swap arrangements to manage the fixed/floating debt portfolio.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC/291 March 25,2012 Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio: Current Assets/Current Liabilities 2005 $14,555,092/ $6,974,752= 2.09:1 2004 $14,643,456/ $6,029,696=2.43:1 Acid Test Ratio: Cash+ Short-Term Investments + Receivables (Net)/ Current Liabilities 2005 $305,563 + $283,583 +$6,133,663/ $6,974,752= .96:1 2004 $357,216 + $133,504 + $5,775,104/ $6,029,696=1.04:1 Receivables Turnover: Net Credit Sales/ Average Net Receivables 2005 $50,823,685/ ($6,133,663 + 5,775,104/2) $50,823,685/ $5,954,384= 8.54 times 2004 $46,044,288/($5,775,104+6,569,344/2) $46,044,288/ $6,172,224=7,46 times Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory 2005 $42,037,624/ ($7,850,970+$7,854,112/2) $42,037,624/$7,852,541=5.35 times 2004 $37,480,050/ ($7,854,112+8,074,880/2) $37,480,050/ $7,964,496=4.71 times Profitability Ratios Current Assets 2004 2005…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The strength of Mark X as a company is its fixed assets turnover ratio, which rose from 1990 to 1992. This tells us Mark X 's ability to generate net sales from each addition of a fixed asset. Sales generated from the fixed assets are greater than the costs of the fixed assets, which imply that the fixed assets that were purchased are good investments for the company. This is really the only positive ratio they have at the moment. Weaknesses we found in Mark X were its debt ratio, which increased from 40.47% in 1990 to 46.33% in 1991 and from 46.33% to 59.80% in 1992. This shows us Mark X 's amount of debt relative to its assets is increasing and that its debt is equal to more than half of its assets by 1992. The current ratio and quick ratio has also indicated negative change, both decreasing between 1990 and 1992. The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company 's ability to pay short term obligations, while the quick ratio shows a company 's ability to pay its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. Both ratios are steadily decreasing, indicating to us the position of the company has become less and less favorable.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Uhura Company

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Uhura CompanyBalance Sheet31-Dec-07AssetsCurrent assetsCash $230,000Trading securities—at fair value $120,000Accounts receivable $357,000Less: Allowance for doubtfulaccounts $17,000 $340,000Inventories, at lower of averagecost or market $401,000Prepaid expenses 12,000Total current assets $1,103,000Long-term investmentsLand held for future use $175,000Cash surrender value of lifeinsurance 90,000$265,000Property, plant, and equipmentBuilding $730,000Less: Accum. depr.—building 160,000$570,000Office equipment $265,000Less: Accum. depr.—officeequipment 105,000160,000730,000Intangible assetsGoodwill 80,000Total assets $2,178,000Liabilities and Stockholders EquityCurrent liabilitiesAccounts payable $135,000Notes payable (due next year) 125,000Rent payable 49,000Total current liabilities $309,000Long-term liabilitiesBonds payable $500,000Add: Premium on bonds payable 53,000$553,000Pension obligation 82,000635,000Total liabilities 944,000Stockholders equityCommon stock, $1 par, authorized400,000 shares, issued 290,000shares 290,000Additional paid-in capital 160,000450,000Retained earnings 784000Total stockholders equity 1,234,000Total liabilities and stock-holders equity $2,178,000E5-12 (Preparation of a Balance SheetPresented below is the trial balance of John Nalezny Corporation at December 31, 2007.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like many business Ford Motor company has its dilemmas as well. Facing Ford Motor’s was a shut down their exiting ling of the Mercury vehicle. The Mercury line tried to be revamped into a model of vehicles people wanted. In May 2010 Ford reported double digit sales (Hirsch, 2010). This was not strong enough to save the Mercury line which accounts for five percent of the total company sales. By shutting down this line, Ford would be able to focus on other lines that were becoming more popular. The major characters are Ford Motor Company, General Motors, and the Government.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When determining the overall financial strength of a company, businesses rely on their current assets to show value. Current assets are defined as assets that can or will be converted into cash quickly. The value of the asset’s will vary and may be used at any time as collateral for loans or other investment business development plans. Current assets will include, of course, cash and cash equivalents, which is the amount of money the company has in its bank accounts including savings bonds, certificates of deposit, and money market funds. Assets must always be calculated as net assets, that is, less any debt owed by the organization. This calculation of current assets can be applied to personal assets as well.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liabilities to Asset ratio for 2010 is 57.4% and for 2009 61.5%. Long-Term Debt Ratio for 2010 is 34.4% and for 2009 is 38.4%. Debt Equity Ratio for 2010 is 81.1% and for 2009 is 100.3%. These numbers are pretty typical for public…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASE 1.3 Just for FEET, Inc. 1. (1) Common-sized Balance Sheet 01/01/1999 01/01/1998 01/01/1997 Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 2% 18% 37% Marketable securities available for sale - - 9% Accounts receivable 3% 4% 2% Inventory 58% 46% 35% Other current assets 3% 1% 1% Total current assets 65% 69% 84% Property and equipment, net 23% 21% 15% Goodwill, net 10% 8% - Other 1% 1% 2% Total assets 100% 100% 100% Current liabilities: Short-term borrowings - Accounts payable 28% 28% 25% Accrued expenses 7% 5% 3% Income taxes payable 0% 1% 0% Current maturities of long-term debt 2% 2% 1% Total current liabilities 36% 86% 93% Long-term debt and obligations 64% 16% 7% Total liabilities 100% 100% 100% Shareholders' equity Common stock 0% 0% 0% Paid-in capital 77% 82% 87% Retained earnings 23% 18% 13% Total shareholders' equity 100% 100% 100% Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (2) Common-sized Statements of Earnings 1999 1998 1997 Net sales 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Cost of sales 58.38% 58.46% 57.54% Gross profit 41.62% 41.54% 42.46% Other revenues 0.17% 0.23% 0.23% Operating expenses Store operating 30.01% 29.18% 27.04% Store opening costs 1.76% 1.41% 4.38% Amortization of intangibles 0.27% 0.25% 0.07% General and administrative 3.14% 3.77% 3.07% Total operating expenses 35.18% 34.60% 34.57% Operating income 6.61% 7.17% 8.12% Interest expense -1.04% -0.30% -0.32% Interest income 0.02% 0.29% 1.85% Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 5.59% 7.15% 9.65% Provision for income taxes 2.15% 2.68% 3.43% Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle 3.44% 4.47% 6.22% Cumulative effect on prior years of change in accounting principle - - -0.80%…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Financial Analysis

    • 1518 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to the NPV analysis, if the predicted cash flow is correct, opening the sixth restaurant could bring limited profit to the company. From where the investors sit, Lisa and Mark might reject the project. They could compare with other investment opportunities by NPV method. Meanwhile sensitivity analysis would be used for offering more information to explain the project. Due to the different data in year 1 and the rest of years, I separated the sensitivity calculation in to two parts for getting accurate change in NPV.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Financial Analysis

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fiscal policy refers to use of government revenue collection and expenditure to influence its economy. Fiscal policy targets a country’s budget of its economic activities. Government can adjust its spending and taxation levels through changing the income distribution, resource allocation or level of aggregate demand and economic activity. In the context of Brazil, in 1970s, the government put some stringent penalties to regulate its imports. The government kept the import tax and penalties high. To implement the policies, the government applied tax deduction on imports, for instance, a Brazilian resident who imported intangibles like knowhow, software and royalties would be subject to withholding tax from remittances, this was equivalent to 25% of an individual registered capital. If a Brazilian taxpayer bought software from abroad, worth £100, the seller would be receiving £15 while the £85 would be remitted to the government. Brazilian tax rule treated any payment of intangible imports as a profit distribution regardless of their justification. This meant that in any importing individual or company would pay more than its income a year (Poterba, 1999).…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ford Motor Company is considered a global automotive industry leader. Ford was able to reinvent themselves to be able to stay ahead of the economic downturns. Ford has continually improved their overall profit and recently started paying dividends again. A good portfolio management plan makes all of this possible.…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Baldwin Bicycle Case

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing the debt to equity we see that there is more debt than there is equity. This is a dangerous position for the firm to be in.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before we start the analysis lets define what we’re looking at, We are looking at what impact the trend towards smart cars had, for Ford in the UK.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have a lot of critical success factors to evaluate the Ford Motors goals and ensure that it gets accomplished. Some of standards are financial and others are non-financial and some of them are quantitative and others qualitative in nature. I have judged the performance goals with at least these three standards;…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays