Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Federalism: Supreme Court of the United States

Good Essays
829 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalism: Supreme Court of the United States
Taylor Reed
10/1/13
Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which the national and state share power and derive authority from the people. While they each share certain powers, each type of government is supreme in some cases. Over the years, federalism has certainly changed because more ideas have been proposed, but ultimately it has centralized the meaning for the better. In order of importance, the Marshall Supreme Court Decisions ranks number one. This began when the state of Maryland attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland. This case established two important principles in constitutional law. Marshall first argued that historical practice established Congress' power to create the bank. Marshall invoked the first bank of the United States history as authority for the constitutionality of the second bank. Second, Chief Justice Marshall refuted the argument that states retain ultimate sovereignty because they ratified the constitution. Chief Justice Marshall also determined that Maryland may not tax the bank without violating the Constitution. This still pertains today because lawmakers use the necessary and proper clause to justify many federal actions. All states would have attempted to tax the federal agencies years ago if Marshall allowed Maryland to do so, which would just put us in debt. Second, the Civil War changed the nature of federalism. The lower southern states tried to create a confederacy, which later lead to the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments in the Constitution. These all dealt with the abolishment of slavery. This changes federalism drastically because the abolishment primarily focuses on the states, not the national government. As seen in Graph Figure 8.3, this issue deals with many of the topics listed. Of the issues listed, the main one that stands out is justice. The Northern states fought long and hard on what they thought was right. Although they limited state powers and added more national involvement after the Civil War, it was safe to say our country was indivisible. We are all unified and that has continued to be a strong statement as of today. Third, Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted to involve all levels of government to cooperate together. He wished to stabilize the economy and personal suffering, but the Supreme Court and the people feared that these changes would tamper with the programs of the court and the government. The Supreme Court thought that the New Deal went beyond Congress’s power. It was viewed as unconstitutional and a “state” power. The court then changed the meaning of the whole Deal to adjust the great change it would have made. Overall, FDR’s New Deal changed the way national and state government cooperated. For example, Graph Figure 8.2 shows the locations of all the federal agencies across the countries. It shows that the national government is trying to increase efficiency of the government of both the national and states. Today, the national government helps regulate the issues faced in the states which a change, in a positive way. Fourth, President Ronald Reagan led a revolution of enforcing a new movement called “New Federalism”, which was an attempt to return power to the states. This altered the relationship of the national and state government. As a result, Reagan pushed for block grants because the national government declined to aid the states. He was accused of weakening the states with debts because the states then had to pay for their responsibilities, which was an opposite effect of his intentions. Today the issue of the proper balance between national and state powers is as viable as it was in 1789. States' rights have remained a controversial topic for more than 200 years. Americans are divided between which laws should be national and which should be reserved to the states. Fifth and lastly, the Tenth Amendment was the cause of the states’ powers to be described in depth due to the fact the states held all powers in the Constitution. “The powers not delegated to the States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”. The powers stated in the sentence above lie at the foundation of a states’ right to legislate for the public health and welfare of all citizens, which are called “reserved powers”. Today, these reserved powers are the basis against criminal laws, such as the death penalty and abortion. Federalism plays an extremely important role in our country and it is how our country runs. It is crucial to understand the facts and knowledge behind all of it because it is the reason our country is strong. It has shaped the way our government plays everything out and displays how complex it all is.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalism is basically a system adopted by a nation that allows two or more levels of government to have power over the same people and area. This, however, can lead to conflicts since the two governments might try to assert power over the same issue. This can be clearly seen in the Gibbons v. Ogden case. In this case, Chief Marshall was able to use the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to make clear that Congress, and not the states, has the power to regulate commerce between the states. Therefore, this conflict between the two levels of government was resolved by this court decision. If the United States had a unitary government, where all power resided the central government, this issue would not have…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Federalists- A system of governing in which power is divided between a strong central government and sate government.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the federal system government, there was an article of confederation (1776-1787), which was designed to keep more power in the states government, and less power in the national government. The article of confederation had much weakness, which calls for a change in the government system. The federal government system which is also known as “Federalism” is a division of power between a central government and state/regional government, and the division of powers are as follow; delegated powers (enumerated), which is expressly given to the national government; reserved powers, which reside in the state; and the concurrent powers granted to both national and state government. The balance and boundaries between the federal government and state…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apush Chapter 11 Outline

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * MuCulloch vs. Maryland: Justice John Marshall said that the federal bank of the U.S. was constitutional and no state had the right to tax it.…

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the type of government where there is segment of different powers between a state government and the central government. The United States is a federalist government where the states have their own individual powers and authority that they are able to exercise and the federal government has its own circle of authority that it tends to exercise.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism is a strong central government kept in check by smaller local governments. In the US Constitution a federal government is described with three coequal branches. The first of the coequal branches was the Legislative branch created, as the name would suggest, to form the ultimate law of the land in america. The second was the Executive branch formed as the office of America's Commander in Chief. The third branch was named the Judicial branch and forms the highest court power in the US. Each of these three coequal branches have certain checks and balances over the other two that prevent any one of them from gaining too much power.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism breaks down what National , State and local governments can and cannot do. Like the national government and only the National government has the power to tax,make treaties,coin money,establish post offices,raise a military,declare war,admit new states,build dams,interstate highways,Fund…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the idea of division of power between central and state governments (Madison Document A). In a compound government both the state and central governments must approve on the subject at hand for it too go into effect (Document A). Therefore not only one side is heard and can be made to help the people. Both governments share the powers to tax, borrow money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws. This provides for double security to the people because you have two different governments looking over these important powers making sure they are not misused. Federalism guards against tyranny because two separate governments are watching to make sure that the other does not become corrupt with its powers and the approval of both governments is needed to approve on matters (Document A). The state and central government are one compound government but two different distinct governments with equal…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is defined as the division of power between central government and regional governments, but the addition of new principles into the American federal government overcomplicates the true definition of federalism, generating about five hundred theories. For example, dual federalism declares that the power of the national government and states are different and separate like a layered cake, while cooperative federalism states that the national government and state governments undertake government functions together by sharing power with no overruled power over the other.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial branch of government interprets laws and administers justice. The judicial branch of government was established by Article lll of the Constitution along with other Federal courts created by Congress. This branch came about when statesmen who met in Philadelphia were followers of Montesquieu's concept that powers in politics should be balanced. John Locke's writings supported and made this principle stronger, this led to the judgment that there needed to be three equal branches of government, the executive, legislative, and the judicial branch.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Essay On Tyranny

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The system of many states united under one government but still remain independent on problems within their state is called federalism; which preserves our country from tyranny. “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments,” says James Madison in Federalist Paper #51(Doc A). Madison is referring to the state and national government. The system of federalism allows the national government to partially control and unify the states, and yet the states still…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal state : a system of government where there is a divison of power and shared responsibilities.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism is defined as “the federal principle or system of government”. This concept of “federalism” is explored in Lowi et al and Zimmerman. These two sources list and define two types of federalism. The first type they list is dual federalism, the second one is cooperative federalism. One of the most distinctive differences between the two is how the powers of the national and state governments are defined, this ties into the classic struggle of Founding Fathers: How should power be separated between the states and the national government? Both of these systems are used in our Constitution, however, I believe our current situation in the United States best fits under the system of cooperative federalism. These concepts I will explore in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A federal system checks the growth of tyranny, allows unity without uniformity, encourages experimentation, and keeps government closer to the people. In this system, the people are one with the government so the people like the government and it prevents chaos. In the twenty-first century,…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Models

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most popular court cases is McCulloch v. Maryland. In 1819 there wasn’t much judicial power because the Supreme Courts were still getting settled in, and the public was still skeptical in weather they could trust them or not. The McCulloch v. Maryland court case was in the Marshall Court. John Marshall was the chief justice at this time and he is the one who made the Supreme Court a serious player in government. Marshall Court had a pattern of expanding national power. “The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland expanded national power in two ways…” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, allowed the national government to the right to create a bank. This decision limited state power by, “denying the states the authority to tax activities of the national government.” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision of the court was justified by their interpretation of the Constitution. “In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Court ruled that the Bank of the United States was constitutional and that the Maryland tax was unconstitutional. Concerning the power of Congress to charter a bank, the Court turned to the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, which expressly grants Congress the power to pass laws "necessary and proper" for the execution of its "enumerated powers."” (McBride 2006) This court case is one of the most important because it established the ways the Supreme Court…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays