Preview

Family vs Friends

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2216 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Family vs Friends
Friends vs. Family vs. Coworkers: Reactions vary upon affiliation and environment
Daniel Cooper
University of Houston

Introduction The experiment that I conducted consisted of three groups of people which included friends, family and coworkers. I altered different aspects of my personality in order to try and determine the reactions of three groups that were previously listed above. Some information about me should be known in order for me describe how I changed some aspects of my personality. The simplified version of my personality is that I love to laugh, crack jokes, and I smile pretty much all day. Sometimes it is because I am laughing, and sometimes I just do it unconsciously for no apparent reason. In order for me to measure the reactions of the three groups, they would have had to be completely caught off guard seeing how this experiment was to be conducted in one day. So therefore, the day before the experiment, nobody was informed or had any clue what I would be doing the next day. My experiment was conducted on the Tuesday of April 10th. To conduct the experiment, I simply had to be as direct and straight forward with people as possible. No smiles were made and no jokes were cracked or even initiated. If someone tried to crack a joke, a deep gaze of displeasure was displayed upon them.
To conclude my experiment I had to hypothesize on a couple of different factors. My original hypothesis was that during my experiment my family would response to my new characteristics would be more attentive and caring. My friends would feel withdrawn and some would probably get angry with me. I came up with this conclusion based on prior knowledge and the history that my friends and I have. With my coworkers, I was not exactly sure what to expect from them. There are so many different personalities combined in one environment. It was a toss-up. I felt as if coworkers would not really care because, it is a work environment. This meant that whatever



References: Aronson, E, Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2007). Social Psychology (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy110

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Franzoi, S. L. (2009). PSY 110: Social psychology: 2009 custom edition (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Custom Publishing, P.37-39.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Radioshack's Woes

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Meyer, John P.; Becker, Thomas E.; Vandenberghe, Christian. Journal of Applied Psychology89. 6 (Dec 2004): 991-1007. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991…

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    ambiguous compared to a clinician’s office. Because of the anxiety and passivity generated by the setting, the subject is more prone to behave in an obedient, suggestible manner in the laboratory than elsewhere (Baumrind 48). Baumrind believes this experiment should not be conducted within a laboratory because the environment is too influential on the person’s…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jay D. Gatrell, R. Kleinsasser J.W. Slocum Jr; C. Wekerle. (2009). Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1 (1), 902-904.…

    • 4767 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Milgram's experiment, if he would have informed his participants that they were being tested on how far they would go when they were ordered to do so, even if it was against their conscience, the participants would never have gone as far as they did and the research would have been fundamentally flawed. There is no accurate way to test human nature if the participants change their behavior based on what is expected of them. "The tendency of people to portray themselves in a more favorable light than their thoughts or actions, is called socially desirable responding (Lalwani)." Socially desirable responding is one of the problems with the use of surveys, and the problem carries over to behavioral studies. If the "teachers" from Milgram's experiment had been told the real purpose of the study, they most likely would have applied far less shock, if they shocked at all because that is what is socially acceptable. No one really knows how far they will go under order until they are faced with…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. The source of the problem of generalizing to other experimenters is that characteristics of an experimenter, such as personality and gender may influence the participant. Thus their behavior will change in the presence of a different experimenter with different characteristics. (Page 297) b. One solution to the problem of generalizing to other experimenters is to use two or more experimenters.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    There were famous experiments conducted in psychology and many of these experiments gave scientists a new perspective on understanding people. In the 1950s, scientists began conducting test about the effect of social pressures and influence to the behavior of people. Among these scientists is Leon Festinger. He became a well known scientist about the topic social influence through his famous theory of cognitive dissonance[1].…

    • 3444 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    res/351

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chapter 9 readings this week is about experiments. The learning objectives in this chapter are the used for experimentation, advantages and disadvantages of the experiment method, seven steps of a well-planned experiment, internal and external validity with experiment research designs, and the three types of experiment designs and the variations of each. In chapter 9 experiments is defined as the studies involving intervention by the researcher beyond that required for measurement (McGraw-Hill Company).…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Craighead, E. W., & Nemeroff, C. L. (2001). The Concise Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science (3rd ed.). NJ: John Wiley & sons.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found this article entertaining and interesting. It gives an overview of evolution of experimental laboratory in psychology, which helped in the emergence of psychology as an independent modern academic discipline. This article only illustrates the number of laboratories open during the specific era in United States, but lacks the information regarding the experimental methods used by scholars to conduct researches in these laboratories. The laboratory experiments in psychology have their own advantages and disadvantages. Scholars can control the conditions better, can replicate, and can change the variables, which makes the experiment more reliable. But whereas on the other hand there are chances that scholars might miss the naturalistic behaviour and can cause personal bias.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5.|Students who were told that a young woman had been instructed to act in a very unfriendly way for the purposes of the experiment concluded that her behavior:|…

    • 6548 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To conduct this social experiment, you need to first choose a particular social setting (because each social setting may have different social norms). The options are limitless for this assignment – classrooms, restaurants, public spaces, libraries, dormitories, and work environments all have social…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology

    • 6643 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Social Psychology: Unraveling the Mystery.4th Edition. Allyn and Bacon. ISBN: 0-205-49395-5…

    • 6643 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Psychology

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In social psychology there are many researchers who investigated and challenged different theories within including well respected psychologists including; Sheriff(1935); Jenness(1932); Asch(1951); Crutchfield(1955) and Mann(1969). The aim of the study was; guessing how many sweeties were in the jar in a competition fashion and testing if the participants conformed to their guesses. The hypothesis was ' people would conform under group pressures of the pre-set guesses. The null hypothesis was that people would not conform under group pressures unless due to extraneous variables. The experiment was a field experiment using the techniques of independent groups design. The experiment was dressed as a competition based on the following three conditions; high pre-set; control pre-set and low pre-set guesses. The group used random selection in three math classes with the senior pupils of three different levels (higher, intermediate one and intermediate two). The IV (independent variable) that was used was the pre-set guesses and the DV (dependent variable) was the level of conformity performed by the participants. The conclusion of the results showed that 31.25% of the high pre-set guesses conformed (in the reign of 40+), 23.33% of the low pre-set guesses conformed (in the reign of -30) and 43.48% of the control pre-set guesses conformed (within the reign of 25-45). The breakdown of the analysis for instance the mean of all conditions and overall, the range of all conditions and control(appendix 13). After the group completed the experiment thought was put into how testing conformity could be continued. The ideas from the experiment could lead to testing the intelligence levels of people who conform and test is this level of intelligence has an effect on the level of conformity.…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Breaking Bad

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The social science experiment I conducted involved me violating a social norm and observing the reactions I would get for doing something considered “not normal” by societal standards. I monitored the reactions of five different groups throughout the experiment to get the best results. I rode the elevator five times but instead of standing the “normal” way which is facing the door an unspoken social norm I stood the wrong way. I stood backwards facing the back instead of the door. I got various reactions ranging from laughing to even being asked if I was ok this contradicted my hypothesis and proved it wrong which was even if I stand the wrong way in the elevator and go against the social norm then people still won’t really react.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays