Preview

Exemplification Essay: If I Listen To Howard Stern

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5065 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exemplification Essay: If I Listen To Howard Stern
Like millions of Americans, I listen to Howard Stern on the radio in the mornings. I think he is smart, quick and funny. Sometimes he is ''offensive,'' but to be quite frank, I am not ''offended,'' because what he says falls within the realm of words and subjects that, as an adult, I have long been familiar with even without the tutelage of Stern.
Unlike millions of Americans, I do not listen to Rush Limbaugh on the radio. One reason for that is that I am usually at the movies when he's on the air -- an alternative I urge on his listeners. Limbaugh does offend me when I monitor him, because he has cheapened political discourse in this country with his canned slogans and cheap shots. Once you call a feminist a ''feminazi,'' what else is there to say about feminism?
Of course you may disagree with me and prefer Limbaugh. I may disagree with you and prefer Stern. That is our right as Americans. What offends me is that the right wing, secure in its own right to offend, now wants to punish Stern to the point where he may be forced off the air.
The big difference, of course, is that Stern's offenses usually have
…show more content…
"I think we should do exactly what we have been doing for ten years. Every time you hit the button, you are saying the FCC is right. Every time we hit the button, we are saying we're doing something wrong. And I suggest to you there is nothing wrong about this show. We are in a war. It's a cultural war. The Republican Party used to stand for -- and I supported this -- less government in your life, less intervention in your life, less control of your bedroom and your private life. They no longer stand for that. [Attorney General John] Ashcroft is out of control. He's looking to invade your bedroom. He doesn't want you watching porno. He doesn't want you looking at statues. He doesn't want you watching HBO. He doesn't want you to hear this show. It's absolutely out of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article by Jayme Deerwester in USA Today online is a rhetorical and slight propagandist piece on the interview/ debate between Trevor Noah and Tomi Lahren on the Daily Show. The writer writes in a very bipartisan and not biased on either side of the political spectrum. She talks about how the debaters were, “engaged in a spirited but respectful debate and managed not to talk over each other, a feat that's become all but unheard of on cable news the last few years.” (Deerwester, After That 'Daily Show' Interview) showing that she got taken aback by how the debate went and how calm both sides were to talking even if Tomi could have been aggressive due to being in a place that finds her views bothersome and frightful. She then later talks…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Off Brand: The Limits of Celebrity Feminism,” Andi Zeisler uses two recent celebrity feminist-movement incidents as a starting point for her argument that celebrity feminism is holding back and depoliticizing feminism. One incident involves Kim Kardashian announcing at a conference as a keynote speaker that she holds feminist beliefs but she does not like labels therefore she does not identify as a feminist. The second incident revolves around the comedian Amy Schumer’s employment of a friend of hers as a writer for her show, Kurt Metzger, who has exhibited aggressive behavior toward women and feminists and rather vocally holds severely anti-feminist beliefs. Zeisler puts forth that this has been shown time and time again with the celebrities…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jason Zinser’s “The Good, the Bad, and The Daily Show” his purpose was to formulate a response to the uncertainty regarding the legitimacy and ethics of ‘fake’ news sources. Zinser begins by discussing if it is acceptable to obtain information from a humorous and often satirical news source (in this example, The Daily Show), he points out that “the question isn’t whether Jon Stewart or the show’s producers and writers are morally corrupt people, but whether or not fake news is, on the whole, beneficial or damaging to society” (Zinser 363-364). In other words, he begs the question, can we really be an informed public that can contribute, comprehend, and function as a democracy through the projections of a ‘fake’ news source?…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, he only appeals to emotion twice throughout his article. First, he explains how “Mr. Snoden told [him] that the document reminded him of the F.B.I.’s overreach during the days of J. Edgar Hoover, when the bureau abused its powers to monitor and harass political activists” (Bamford), which suggests the government has been corrupt in the past. Bamford then appeals to emotion by explaining that what the NSA is doing “[is] much like how the F.B.I. tried to use Martin Luther King’s infidelity to talk him into killing himself”(Bamford 1), which should make any American think twice about who we put in charge to keep us…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To live in a “free” country where you get criticized for speaking your mind is a sad place. After being mute from the GQ controversy, A&E star, Phil Robertson decides to speak his mind. From gun control, government assistance, to technology- Phil talks about it all.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ron Paul Media Coverage

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In November, after Ron Paul established himself as a top-tier candidate and had been consistently polling well in Iowa and New Hampshire, CBS allotted Ron Paul 89 seconds of speaking time during its debate. The debate focused on foreign policy and national security. His campaign issued a statement saying Ron Paul was treated unfairly. Not only is Ron Paul a veteran, but he also serves on the House Foreign Relations Committee. His campaign stated, “Congressman Paul was only allocated 90 seconds of speaking in one televised hour. If we are to have an authentic national conversation on issues such as security and defense, we can and must do better to ensure that all voices are heard.” CBS is not the only network that has skewed coverage of each candidate. Ron Paul consistently receives less time than the “establishment favorites” in almost every…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    exercise 7 en1420

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What was your initial reaction to Limbaugh’s claim that, “feminism was established so that unattractive women could have easier access to the mainstream of society?…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of the article, Ben Bagdikian, states that the television broadcasting is dominated by a handful of giant media conglomerates that are heavily tilted to the political right. Bagdikian also states that because the media conglomerates broadcast programs solely for the purpose of making money, a lot of television programs involve sex and violence. Bagdikian argues that the aforementioned statements can be explained by the fact that the media companies care more about making money than anything else and by the fact that the Federal Communications Commission has forgotten its mandated task of making sure that the broadcasters serve the public interest. He points out that the media company’s performance is measured by the stock market; if the programs shown do not raise the stock market, the president and CEO might be out of the job. As a result, Bagdikian argues that the media companies do not care about producing more diverse programming; they only put on programs that they believe will make them the most money. Bagdikian also believes that the Federal Communications Commission has not been doing its job for the last thirty years because most of the members on the Federal Communications Commission are conservatives that believe that it is in public’s interest for the media companies to maximize profits, even if that comes at the cost of quality programming.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Sandra Silenced?

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Limbaugh attacked Fluke on his radio show calling her profanity such as “slut”, as well as nasty remarks such as “She must be paid to have sex! What does that make her? A slut, a prostitute, she wants to be paid to have sex” (Limbaugh). As a woman, wanting contraception does not make you a slut. Fluke’s point was to protect women’s rights, not just her own.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goldwater vs Great Society

    • 2941 Words
    • 12 Pages

    "HBO Hijacks Barry Goldwater 's Ideology - HUMAN EVENTS." Conservative News, Views & Books - HUMAN EVENTS. Web. 26 Oct. 2010. <http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=17198>.…

    • 2941 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hate radio is mainly about how corrupt the radio is and the effects it has on listeners. Many of these radio shows are criticizing, looking down on, and even making fun of minority races, minority religions, and even females in general. This gives the public reason to hate these minorities. It angers me that such a large number of people in our country can be influenced by radio. I think it should even be outlawed if they are making discriminatory comments about other races. I understand the first amendment and that there’s supposed to be freedom of speech in our country. I agree that the people speaking on the radio should be allowed to say what they are saying, but not to the entire public. When someone can…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The right to freedom of speech came under scrutiny in the case of John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. versus Free Speech Coalition, et al. in 2002. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's judgment against the plaintiff’s broader definition of pornography in enacting the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. This broader definition, the court finds it in contravention with the First Amendment. The Ninth Circuit reasoned that the definition of banning any depiction of pornographic materials, including films that Congress adds on the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 was overboard and as such violated the First Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote: "First Amendment freedoms are most in danger…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Younow Moderator

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a YouNow Moderator, what would you do if you came across a user who was insulting a broadcaster? *…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship in America

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Teachers suspended, radio and television personalities fired, authors disinvited to speaking events, all because their words, views and shows did not agree with what a handful of people consider appropriate. One would think these types of situations regarding censorship happened decades ago, not in a time now, where people pride themselves on having an open-mind and the ability of forward thinking. However, censorship still prevails in America today, and not only censorship of pornography or violence on television, but it seeps into our textbooks and classrooms too, all in the name of protecting the children.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daily Show

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The host of the Daily Show is a stand up comedian named Jon Stewart. The Daily Show also happenes to air on a channel called the Comedy Central. The Comedy Central is known for obnoxious comedies like the Chapel Show and South Park. So why do people take the Daily Show seriously and use the show as a main source for news? Television tends to have a huge impact on people. Main stream media tends to stick in peoples mind and constantly stay there. People use the Daily Show as a main source of news because “The Daily Show delivers the news in a way better suited to our ever-shrinking attention spans.” (Zinser, 370).This information staying in our head affects our views and opinions which among those are political views.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics