Preview

Examine the Reasons for, and the Effects of, Changes in Family Size over the Past 100 Years or so.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine the Reasons for, and the Effects of, Changes in Family Size over the Past 100 Years or so.
What is meant by “neo-conventional family” (2)
The neo-conventional family, created by Chester, symbolise the change from Traditional nuclear family to his idea of neo conventional where there are two parents whom enter the relationship equally of child bearing and finical activity.

Explain the difference between “expressive” and “instrumental” role? (4marks)
The terms expressive and instrumental role were introduced into functionalism to represent the meaning of the ideal family. “Expressive” was the caring and emotional role of a house wife. Whereas instrumental role was the economical father whom worked for the family.

Identify three of the type of family diversity described by rapport and rapport. (6marks)
1)Organisational diversity- how family is structured e.g nuclear, extended, lone-parent

2)Cultural diversity- different commons from different norms and values in different cultures.

3)Class diversity- how different types of families are affect by social class. E.g children whom go to boarding schools than poorer schools hold a different relationship with parents.

Using material from item A and elsewhere assess sociological explanations of the nature and extent of family diversity today (24 marks) family diversity is the idea that there are a range of different family types, rather than a single dominant one like the nuclear family. It is associated with the post-modernists idea that in today’s society increasing choice about relationships is creating greater family diversity. The biggest causes to diversity is arguably social change. For example divorce rates have increased dramatically from 1960. The recent statistics of divorce show that 42% of marriages ended in 2012. This can be down to many factors such as how government laws have made it easier to divorce a partner for instance 1984 British law changed allowing divorce to take place from 3 years of marriage to 1 year, this had a domino effect in society with an increase

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess sociological explanations of the nature and extent of family diversity today.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rapoport and Rapoport agreed that there are five types of diversity in a contemporary family, these are: Organisational, Cultural (ethnic), Class, Cohort and Life Course. Organisational diversity refers to kinship patterns and the domestic division of labour, adding to this it is also the structure of the family-whether it is reconstituted or extended for example. Cultural diversity in Britain occurs because of ethnic minority, cultural diversity is the structure of these ethnic minority families. A stereo-typical look into an Afro- Caribbean family would show that they are often single-parent families with the mother being the main source of care and socialisation to the children. The third type of diversity Rapoport et al showed was Class, it is clear that wealth and income has affected things like housing, room size/number, financial problems and holidays, for example. The final two types of diversity are Cohort and life course, cohort is the idea that family is affected those born in the same year (or band of years). Such individuals may well have a shared experience of historical events, for example, the introduction of comprehensive schools, or the introduction of the birth control pill. Finally life course is individuals within families can vary greatly. This can reflect choice or circumstance. This covers such factors as the number of children, the spacing of the children, divorce, remarriage, widowhood. Another study carried out by Bonnerjea and Eversley point to a link between family type and locality – that specific patterns of family life are found in…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologists also sometimes talk about ‘the cereal packet family’ (Leach 1967) - a certain type of nuclear - this refers to the image most people hold of the family. It is also the picture of the family that the media tends to present, especially in adverts. The cereal packet family comprises of: parents and children, the woman is a housewife and full time mother and the man is the 'breadwinner' i.e. he is the one who has to go to work to earn money.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parsons functional fit theory says that with industrialisation and urbanisation, the structure of the family becomes nuclear to fit the needs of industrial society for geographically and socially mobile labour force. Parsons argues that the functions the family performs depend on the kind of society the family lives in. Parsons differentiates between two types of family, the nuclear family of just parents and children and the extended family of three generations living together. The nuclear family was necessary because the industry required a geographically mobile workforce that could move to where new factories were built, which was difficult to achieve with large extended families. Also, a socially mobile workforce was necessary because most extended families had an ascribed status, usually with the eldest female having the highest status this could cause issues if a younger female had a higher achieved status as he would have a better job, therefore nuclear families without…

    • 1022 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One postmodernist view on family diversity is the idea that the type and structure of the family an individual is in depends on what stage of life they are in and what they suit. Stacey argues that there is no right or wrong type of family. There are a wide variety of household types. This supports the idea of family diversity as everyone is diverse and there is no longer a dominant type of family. OUTLINE AND EVLATUATE POSTMODERNIST VIEWS ON FAMILY DIVERSITY (33 Marks)…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    It is suggested that the structure approach to family is less important than the functional approach to family. Cheal defined the structure of family as grouping of system’s parts, such as the family roles of mother, father and child (Cheal, D. 2002:162). For the approach of structure of family, the kind of family members, the relationships, positions or roles, are consisted within the family and the members of family are interacted but the activities of the family or the consequences of their activities are not included. For instance, it included the main roles of the parents in family might be transited values to child, to let child get ready to go to school and provided food for them. Still, it tends to be insignificant for social scientists to challenge. Therefore, they emphasis on family functions more (Cheal, D. 2002:7).…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conventional nuclear family is seen as the best type of family for modern life by functionalists and the New Right. However the number of nuclear families in Britain has been in decline as there has been a massive rise in other families such as lone parent families. The roles of nuclear families are often stereotyped in media and politics. The stereotype contains two ideas:…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Diversity means that people come for different culture. Children come from a variety of backgrounds and family…

    • 4544 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    New Right and Postmodernist, (n.d), To introduce New Right and Postmodernist perspectives on the nuclear family, available at: http://www.educationforum.co.uk/sociology_2/post.htm…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firstly, clarifying the meaning of diversity is of utmost importance here in such that, diversity has been well-defined at diverse conceptual levels as it is been associated with age, gender, nationality, ethnicity, work status and education. Therefore, turning to the generally established definition, diversity signifies the dissimilarity between individuals on any characteristics that may bring about the insight that another person is dissimilar from the self (Roberge and Van Dick 2010; Podsiadlowski, et al. 2013). Correspondingly, with reference…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of these functions can be seen in the model modern family – it is, in effect, somewhat of an idealistic view of the way in which family within society behaves. This is one way in which the functionalist perspective is challenged. When looking at modern society and the role family has within it, the functionalist perspective fails to identify that, in some cases, this family model does not exist. Both Murdock and Parsons observations of the family have failed to identify with any other form or institution that may be in place to emulate, and that can take the role of, the family. Indeed, as Morgan notes in his criticism of Murdock’s view on the family, Murdock does not answer ‘to what extent these basic functions are inevitably linked with the institution of the nuclear family’ (Morgan, 1975). By doing this, both Murdock and Parsons fail to depict the form that alternatives to the family may take, and thus cannot reflect the modern role of the family in society today accurately.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perspectives such as functionalist and the new right have been described as ‘modernist’. That is, they see modern society as having a fairly fixed, clear-cut and predictable structure. They see one ‘best’ family type- the nuclear family- as slotting into this structure and helping it by performing certain essential functions. Modernists are firmly opposed to family diversity. They hold the view that there is only one correct or normal family type. They see the traditional patriarchal nuclear family consisting of a married couple and their dependent children, with a clear labour division between the breadwinner husband and the home maker wife as correct. They also see a clear distinction between who should carry out the ‘instrumental’ and ‘expressive’ role in the household. For example, according to Talcott Parsons there is a ‘functional fit’ between the nuclear family and modern society. He sees the nuclear family as uniquely suited to meeting the needs of modern society for a geographically and socially mobile workforce, and as performing two ‘irreducible functions’- the primary socialisation of children and the stabilisation of adult personalities. He claims these functions contribute to the overall stability and effectiveness of society. Hence, other family types can be considered as abnormal, or even deviant, since they are less able to…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to society the family performs many different and important functions for society and individuals. I will examine the views of Functionalism, the New Right and Marxist and identify the functions performed by the family for individuals and society.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The family was once described as a social group that shared common residence, consisted of at least two adults of each sex that maintained a socially approved sexual relationship and had one or more children, their own or adopted. This is a nuclear family, described by George Murdoch to be a universal family type. Although it is correct to say that nuclear families reside universally, family types now vary from single-parent families to gay headed families. Despite the variety, they contribute to the society, in ways that can be positive and negative too. Many sociologists differ in their views as to whether the family is positive to the society or not- functionalists believe that the family has positive functions that contribute positively to the society but it has to be said that functionalists tend to ignore negative aspects of the family such as the 'dark side', which consists of all that makes the family a negative experience for its members. Nevertheless there are sociologists that focus on only the negative aspects, such as, radical psychiatrists, radical feminists and Marxists. The new right theory has faith that family is a positive function of the society, however new rights only refer to nuclear families, as they believe that any other family type is inferior.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The family form has changed a great deal over the decades. In the early to late 50’s the UK mainly saw the ‘modern nuclear’. According to Talcott Parsons (1955) the ‘isolated nuclear family is the typical form in modern industrial society’. The ‘norm’ was based upon the 1960’s American ideology’s which comprised of a mother, father and children, with the father being the ‘bread winner’ and the mother as the ‘homemaker’(Mintz 2007), often seen as the ‘Happy Days’ or ‘cereal packet’ family. This form changed when divorce became socially acceptable in the UK during the mid 60’s, feminism was rife and women no longer found they had to stay at home, marry, raise or have children, this in a way saw a rise in the family group known as single parents (Giddens, 2001). Today however the family form has changed and it is often possible to see a variation of both the ‘nuclear’ family and the single parent family.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays