When these needs are not met, the result is a state of anxiety or tension. Sometimes referred to as the pleasure – pain principle, this motivating force helps drive behavior but it also wants instant satisfaction. As you might imagine, some needs simply cannot be met in the moment we feel them. If we satisfied our every whim whenever we felt hunger or thirst, we might find ourselves behaving in ways that are not appropriate for the given moment. I think that Epicurus and Freud have similar views on what pleasure is and what is unpleasurable. They both believe that the key to happiness and pleasure is, getting the highest good, or things that will make us feel good in that moment. For example, if you are hungry then you would eat, therefore you have met your pleasure goal by feeding yourself, or if someone is thirsty and they drink water, they have satisfied themselves by hydrating. I would also say that both Epicurus and Freud also believe that love is the center of satisfaction. We are satisfied by loving others and by being …show more content…
I personally do not feel like there is anything more basic or important than pleasure that we strive for. Everything that we do is based around pleasure. For example, I am attending college right now so that I can graduate with a good degree, and be able to live a happy and successful life. I know that if I can accomplish this goal then I will reach a high level of pleasure. No one wants to feel pain or unpleasure. If I am hungry then I will eat to satisfy my needs, I would not just sit in hunger as my stomach hurts and makes loud noises. That is in my opinion the opposite of pleasure, which is