Preview

Ebt Abuse

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ebt Abuse
EBT Card Abuse Proposal Many people that are on government assistance have been taking advantage of the government system for some time now. Especially people who are EBT card recipients. These recipients are supposed to use the government’s assistance that comes from taxpayer’s money to purchase necessities. Yes, some EBT card recipients may not all be guilty of this abuse. Yet, for those people who are abusing the government system, they are making it harder for the people who truly need the benefits to gain access to receiving EBT cards. Tax payers are noticing that their money is going to waste. They see some EBT card recipients in take advantage, and see their money being wasted on people who do not necessarily need the government’s assistance. Since this is turning into a bigger as it goes on, the government should step up and take action by creating some kind of watch system over EBT card recipients spending. In Michelle Malkins blog "EBT Abuse: The Cash-for-Drunkards-Program" explains clearly what EBT means and what the intentions of use are for. "EBT stands for the federal government 's electronic benefits transfer card, which is intended to provide poor people with food stamps and cash assistance for basic necessities." This is clearly what EBT cards and the government’s assistance is assumed to be used for. Instead many of the EBT recipients use taxpayer’s money to buy alcohol, cigarettes, fast food and nail salons. This kind of spending by EBT recipients is witnessed by many people all the time. Those who receive EBT assistance are supposed to use taxpayer’s money to buy necessities. The things that EBT is supposed to help families with the necessities to live are to help supply groceries, a home, help pay certain bills, and supply children with the needs that they have. These are some of the things that EBT is intended for, but other people are taking advantage and using


Cited: "Massachusetts places restrictions on EBT cards." Policy & Practice June 2011: 30. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 5 Apr. 2013. Malkin, Michelle. "Michelle Malkin » EBT Abuse: The Cash-for-Drunkards Program." Web log post. Michelle Malkin RSS. Jazz Mustache LLC, 11 Jan. 2013. Web. 05 Apr. 2013. <http://michellemalkin.com/2013/01/11/ebt-abuse-the-cash-for-drunkards-program/>. Wetzstein, Cheryl. "Maryland, Texas lead crackdown on food-stamp program cheaters." Washington Times [Washington, DC] 17 Apr. 2000: 6. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 5 Apr. 2013. Machen, Meredith. "Tennessee Bill Would Crack down on EBT Card Abuse." WCYB. 7 Mar. 2013. Web. 05 Apr. 2013. Davis, Larry. "Maine News, Sports, Weather | Kennebec Journal, Augusta, Maine." EBT Cards Abused to Buy Less-than-nutritious Items. Web. 05 Apr. 2013. Wetzstein, Cheryl. "Maryland, Texas lead crackdown on food-stamp program cheaters." Washington Times [Washington, DC] 17 Apr. 2000: 6. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 5 Apr. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Snitch Line Research Paper

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1995, a welfare “Snitch Line” was created to crack down on welfare fraud in order for governments and taxpayers to save millions of dollars. “During the 1980’s and 1990’s the public perception was that welfare fraud was a serious and costly expense well beyond reality” (Reitsma-street & Keck, 1996 ..). The Snitch Hotline and Fraud prevention team promised taxpayers a saving of over 100 mil in the first year. This estimated savings did not including police, legal, social and prison costs associated with charging recipients with fraud. Although the purpose of the hotline seemed, and was expressed, as extremely positive reality of its contribution was different. Reality is that the number of cases found…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Food Stamp Synthesis Essay

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another article that fits this stasis is the CBPP article. It just takes a look at how effective the whole system is in general. It talks about how they changed the title to SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and this newer version of the food stamp program is much better than the last one. Both kind of agreeing in the fact that there needs to be some sort of reform to the system, whether new or just cleaning it…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of EBT

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not only are they buying ridiculous unnecessary items, that are not good for the body, but the price these items cost is just annoying. WIC another government program that gives money to mothers in need, is what I feel EBT needs to follow in the matters of items people can buy. What I like about WIC is that is only lets the mothers buy the necessities to take care of themselves and their babies such as milk, baby food, beans, cheese, produce, and grains. With EBT it should follow some of those policies, with some alterations. My ideal food stamps for people in need would be and certain amount in red meat and pork that could be purchased, there would be no soda, energy drinks, candy bars, ice cream, cookies, cakes, basically all the food items that have bad nutritional value and are just plain unnecessary. The next add on to my version of EBT is at least one person on the EBT card has a full-time job and show proof of employment every two months, along with everyone in the house hold being tested for drug use. I feel that if I’m going to have to help pay for their food then they should have restrictions. For those who read my paper I’d be interested in your ideas on restrictions for…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An issue in human services that is being mulled around in my community and state is what to do about drug and alcohol use while collecting welfare and other state benefits. The money that is meant to get the parents back on their feet and provide for the children is being grossly misused. Many people who are collecting benefit checks, food stamps, and medical benefits are unable to pass a drug test so in essence are not able to work. They seem to be able to afford cigarettes, alcohol, and drugs but run short on bills, diapers and household goods.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The definition makes welfare sound easy, but there are many loop holes in the system that many people take advantage of. With over 40 million Americans receiving food stamps and 50 percent of households relying on government assistance, the system is doomed to fail if there is not a change. Hard working Americans will not be able to much longer provide what many receiving assistance have grown accustomed to. Throughout the course of American history welfare has been “reformed” many times to only cause problems later in the future. The idea of welfare was formed with great intentions, but it has spiraled out of control. Many people take advantage of the tax dollars that people work hard for. Some Americans spend their government check on drugs. They simply sale their food stamp card for extra cash to buy unnecessary things. The author of “Welfare Programs Should Include Mandatory Drug Testing” shares a personal experience and states, ‘Growing up, my mother was a recipient who abused the welfare system. I remember having no heat or electricity and being so hungry it was painful. My siblings and I would fist fight over food. She would trade her food stamp card for various things like cash, cigarettes and an occasional joint. She just wouldn 't help herself, and we were the kids that no one…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snap Research Paper

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This article is a report in the “food assistance” section of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities website. Bolen et. al’s information comes from deep expertise, research, and analyzation of SNAP policies. This reports on the thousands of adults who will lose their SNAP benefits in 2016 and provides information on the 1996 welfare law that is taking effect once again and the people who are being affected by this and why. Bolen et. al explains that there are few states that provide work or job training to all who need it, reports and provides statistics of those in history who have lost their benefits when the time limit is imposed and takes effect on those who tend to be poor. In addition, the authors provide information on factors that contribute to unsuccessful employment and solutions that that will help individuals retain their benefits. Analyzed by experts in the food assistance field, the article provides full-length detail on the logistics of the changes implemented. This report will give me information on why people are losing their benefits and what can be done to help people keep their…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Woman working at a convenience store in the US had a man walk in with an EBT card (Food Stamp Credit Card or something similar) and he wanted to buy cigarettes. The woman refused and the man left. The next day the man came in again with a member of his family and raised a commotion about it. The owner came in, sold the man cigarettes and fired the woman. Some people might say that it is unconstitutional to demand a mandatory drug test in order to receive welfare, and it will deny them their human rights. Receiving welfare is a privilege not a right. Recipients should be drug tested in order to collect welfare.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Working Stereotypes

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The year was 1976. The presidential race was starting to pick up, with all of the nomination hopefuls attempting to make their mark. At one of the campaign stops, one of the two candidates from the Republican party, former governor of California Ronald Reagan stepped up onto the stage to speak. He knew the speech he was about to give, as he performed it at almost every stop, according to the press accounts following him. "There's a woman in Chicago," Reagan says. "She has 80 names, 30 addresses, 12 Social Security cards. She's got Medicaid, getting food stamps and she is collecting welfare under each of her names. Her tax-free cash income alone is over $150,000." With a single speech, Reagan was able to establish the single story of the “Welfare Queen”, building the stereotype that will define the working poor for the next 40 years. This narrative is always about someone, usually of the working poor or underclass, who abuses the benefits given to them.…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This money can, and it should be used for something so much better. For example, the money that the applicant would have received considering they passed the drug test should be used to rehabilitate the individual. Addiction is a compulsive physiological need for and use of a habit-forming substance (as heroin, nicotine, or alcohol) characterized by tolerance and by well-defined physiological symptoms upon withdrawal; broadly: persistent compulsive use of a substance known by the user to be physically, psychologically, or socially harmful (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). Assuming, that our public assistance programs could get mandatory drug…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Voice of San Diego website. (November 20, 2011). Food stamp enrollment soars, but San Diego still rates low. The Voice of San Diego. Retrieved from http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/survival/article_1e0046e2-125a-11e1-a0aa-001cc4c002e0.html…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a program consist of this many people there’s always going to be someone that messes it up or the entire group. “Supporters have argued for decades that requiring welfare recipients to take drug tests helps ensure that the government assistance is going to people who truly need it rather than supporting those who use illegal drugs”(Welfare Drug Testing 1), but the government is facing many hurdles to do so. “Welfare drug testing efforts have faced legal challenges from recipients who argue that such test violate the fourth amendment of the U.S. constitution which bans “ ‘ Unreasonable searches and seizures’ “(Welfare Drug Testing 1).This is outrageous though, that people can cry and call help for all the help they need, but as soon as they need to actually do something for these benefits all of the peoples mind set change from “I’ll do whatever it takes” to “I’m not doing that”. It should be known that once the government starts to give you money to live, that there should be no doubt you take a drug test for these benefits. The government doesn’t have to help you but they want to, so why fight them on this matter? The recipients that fight and fight over this controversial topic are the ones that don’t think their rights are being violated but the ones that are afraid that if this were to happen that they would lose their benefits. Why fight it unless you’re breaking the law…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are approximately 30 million Americans on some sort of welfare right now. In 2010, the United States Federal Government spent $0.8 trillion toward welfare. The amount spent on welfare in 2010 is one of the top expenses, money spent on defense and healthcare were the highest expenses, but welfare was third (Chantrill, Christopher). The main purpose of an economic welfare system is to assist citizens who are not able to support themselves or their families due to unemployment, underemployment, hardship, unskilled labor capacity, disability, or other similar reasons. So why are there some many Americans that solely rely on welfare benefits? Welfare recipients should be drug tested. Testing for drugs among welfare recipients would save the US Government millions of dollars, it would help many Americans overcome their illegal drug habits, and taxpayer’s money would not support somebody’s illegal drug use.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “With 4, 300,000 people, roughly 4.1% of the American population on welfare, the government annually spends about 132 billion dollars on welfare, which does not include either food stamps or unemployment insurance.” (DOHHS, 2012). Since the 1930s, many forms of welfare have been assisting the needy families and less fortunate of the society. However, within the past few years or so, there have been actions made to start drug testing recipients of welfare, potentially altering the whole concept of welfare. Although, only 3 states, as of now, have actually made it a law, “getting welfare and food stamps may become tougher as twenty three states around the country seek to adopt stricter laws that would require public aid recipients to take drug tests.” (Alcindor, 2012).…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Medicaid Fraud

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mackelvie, C.F. (2004). "The impact of fraud and abuse regulations - Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse statutes. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3257/is_n10_v46/ai_13413481/pg_6/?tag=content;col1…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Drug Test for Welfare

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The high number of taxpayers who want welfare recipients to be drug tested are not aware of the little effect the drug testing will have. According to many workers of an anti- poverty group named Just Harvest, any potential savings that the taxpayers believe drug testing will have, will not even be noticed by the state because food stamps and welfare are federally funded. The state does pay a portion of the administrative costs, and the drug testing would increase the cost as shown in a New Hampshire state fiscal note. The law says, “Those who fail the required drug testing may designate another individual to receive the benefits on behalf of their children.” This would last for at least six months, and up to one year unless the same person fails a second time where there is a minimum of a three year ban. There is no way to know that the person designated would not give the funds to the recipient who was banned because one would assume that they have a relationship of some kind.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays